Self-driving cars are often marketed as safer than human drivers, but new data suggests that may not always be the case.

Citing data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Electrek reports that Tesla disclosed five new crashes involving its robotaxi fleet in Austin. The new data raises concerns about how safe Tesla’s systems really are compared to the average driver.

The incidents included a collision with a fixed object at 17 miles per hour, a crash with a bus while the Tesla vehicle was stopped, a crash with a truck at four miles per hour, and two cases where Tesla vehicles backed into fixed objects at low speeds.

  • tomalley8342@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Nah, that one’s on Elon just being a stubborn bitch and thinking he knows better than everybody else (as usual).

    • ageedizzle@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      He’s right in that if current AI models were genuinely intelligent in the way humans are then cameras would be enough to achieve at least human level driving skills. The problem of course is that AI models are not nearly at that level yet

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        55 minutes ago

        Even if they were, would it not be better to give the car better senses?

        Humans don’t have LIDAR because we can’t just hook something into a human’s brain and have it work. If you can do that with a self-driving car, why cut it down to human senses?

        • ageedizzle@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          47 minutes ago

          I agree it would be better. I’m just saying that in theory cameras are all that would be required to achieve human level performance, so long as the AI was capable enough