Longtime Mint stickler here, never developed a taste for any other distro schools (Arch, Fedora, other *buntus and Debians). But tried out MX after a long period of deferring and I am genuinely blown away. This distro has everything I could have ever ask for - Debian stability coupled with advanced hardware support (with more recent zen kernels and drivers), a solid opinionated Plasma DE setup that is both minimalist and all-encompassing at the same time, and a full stock of sensible and pragmatic utilities to cover the boring stuff.

Mint’s relative lethargy at migrating to wayland has been increasingly becoming a sore point due to the sheer practical difference it makes (especially in terms of multi-monitor HiDPI and fractional scaling, in addition to security and performance). MX KDE has all that covered and then some. It’s the first time I had to genuinely stretch to find any fault. The only complaint I have is that they aren’t letting me post this testimonial in the MX forum because it doesn’t accept anon-aliased emails for logins.

  • Kory@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I was also interested in trying that one with KDE, thanks for posting this.

    I have one question: Are you still required to reinstall when a major new version comes out? I remember last I looked (a while ago) there was no upgrading path.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      25 minutes ago

      TIL. That definitely puts me off, like WTF? How can you fuck up a perfectly upgradable Debian like that?

    • balian@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yes, unfortunately you have to clean install (they have a guide for it). It’s fine for me since it’s based on Debian, which has a very long support cycle spanning two or more years generally.