• AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    ·
    21 hours ago

    “Key questions remain unanswered, such as the definition of “operating system provider,” the type of verification required, the focus on major commercial platforms, and the potential scope beyond them.”

    I guarantee this bill is unenforceable. Cars, phones, traffic lights all have have computers with operating systems. All modern tech has an operating system of some sort. Also how do you even verify age? If my laptop is offline can I just not use it because it can’t confirm my id? What about tech that never goes online but has an OS, like a calculator? I can’t believe microsoft and apple are not lobbying against this. Who becomes liable if an “underage” person is accidentally given access or if access is denied to an “of age” person. I can just imagine an emt frantically looking for their driver’s license so they can use the computerized defibrillator.

    • jtrek@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Microsoft is probably salivating at the idea of being the only legal OS provider.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Microsoft and Apple. The internet will only allow OSs from large American corporations.

        I’d like to see the rest of the world say “fuck it” and carry on as before, leaving the Americans to censor themselves. But governments around the world are suddenly rushing to implement very similar terrible laws. It smells very coordinated.

        • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Yeah, governments all over are trying to implement the same shit, and I agree it’s coordinated. Many governments are also looking seriously at stepping back from reliance on US big tech firms though. Not that homegrown oppression and surveillance is any better.

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          52
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Meta is funding a lot of the lobbyists pushing for age verification laws. Uncoincidentally, Meta both owns a stake in a company providing identity verification as a service, and serves to benefit from not having to moderate its own platforms.

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Citizens United, folks. Because nothing says “freedom of speech” like collusion, bribery, and conflicts of interest!

          • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            17 hours ago

            And meta had a pretty big chance of just getting banned from being used by minors in places around the world, so it might not work out as hoped.

        • Lemmyng@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          But don’t some of these larger orgs fund Linux distros? Like Red Hat with Fedora?

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It feels like a Mr. Smith Goes to Washington display would solve this.

      Just bring everything that has an operating system in it into the room. Cars, boats, planes, construction equipment, tractors, factories, knock off game consoles, literally every server on the internet.

      Show them the ridiculousness of this and maybe we’ll get dragged out by police and charged with contempt of congress

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      19 hours ago

      If my laptop is offline can I just not use it because it can’t confirm my id?

      Yes. The powers at be will stop at nothing to take more, and more, and more power away from you. This is human nature.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The problem comes when a public school’s IT department is deciding whether to go with a FOSS option, or a commercial OS. As the IT team has full control over the FOSS OS, the school will be held liable as the OS provider. They will select a commercial OS to avoid liability under these idiot laws.

    • nullify3112@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      What is this argument? You and I both know they want this age verification at the OS level for personal computing devices: phones, tablets and computers, maybe watches.

      Is this really what’s going to kill this law? Semantics?

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yeah actually. A lot of laws get shitcanned into irrelevance due to being worded like shit on everything from the local to federal levels. That’s not even getting into conflicts with pre-existing well worded laws or the constitution as a whole.

        If it’s worded badly enough it may even just be thrown out on first test due to being vague and too widely applicable. Just for example I drive a 2001 Toyota Tacoma it has an operating system because it’s got an ECU, how the actual fuck would that interact with this law? Obviously the corporate answer is to force me to get a new car but the actual practical answer is that that isn’t viable, so it’s more likely the courts just gut an entire section of the law with one case. Keep up the gutting and sooner or later it’ll end up defunct.