How does one ‘learn AI’?
in unrelated news, washed up actor invests her nest egg in AI companies.
washed up? What are you talking about? She’s been the lead on two different, highly rated, shows for nearly a decade now. And that’s discounting her decades prior of accolades.
But here’s the real problem, you jump to call her “washed up”, she’s only 49. Is Brian Cranston washed up? Was Pachino? Calling a female actor “washed up” because she’s older with a long career just exudes and perpetuates the culture pushing out women as they age.
Just because YOU stopped paying attention to her doesn’t make her washed up. Sorry she’s not the bangable 20something year old “Legally Blonde” anymore. Say what you want about her hot take on AI, that’s fair, but don’t normalize your misogyny as part of it.
hilarious. JFC…The Morning Show?
She’s washed up and investing in AI, while simultaneously insulting women with real jobs by telling them their jobs are bullshit.
I mean, you said yourself she’s working on TV. It’s definitely a step down from the height of her career, and it looks like I’ve never even heard of her most recent show. Pacino is definitely in washed up territory, I haven’t heard anything about him since Jack and Jill or maybe that weird de-aged Netflix movie. Cranston is different in that he’s primarily a TV actor whose work has only become more respected over his career, although apart from the Malcolm reboot I haven’t heard much from him, so perhaps he is in the process of becoming washed. It’s all a relative thing and I don’t think misogyny played as much of a role in this comment as you’re arguing.
EDIT: Reworded my last sentence because misogyny is definitely a huge problem in Hollywood, I just didn’t appreciate you jumping down comment OP’s throat.
Movies mean nothing now, TV is bigger. Well streaming is bigger.
Staying ahead of the game to avoid becoming Reese Withoutherspoon.
She clearly learned nothing from her NFT grift hobby, which did not turn out well https://gizmodo.com/reese-witherspoon-seems-to-have-forgotten-how-well-her-nft-predictions-went-2000653047
cool, cool…Hey Reese which LLM’s have you invested in that you’re now advocating more women utilize them? OpenAI? Anthropic?
She’s not stupid. She’s trying to get a return on investment.
Women tend to dominate care positions, nursing, teaching, and child care. None of them are going to be touched by AI, other than massive head aches caused in teaching kids to lazy to learn. Outside of those, women are in no different position than men when facing automation.
Less women are in fields like electrical, plumbing, and construction which are harder to automate and more are in things like customer service and reception. I think she’s just saying things, but I can understand why someone may have said that.
I’m also getting my tax advice from Gonzo on LinkedIn.
What a sad state of journalism. Celebrity posted something on social. Opinions are divided. Commenters said this. Others said that. Thanks for looking at our ads.
She may be right, I dunno. I’m criticizing the publication and quality of the story, not the actor and alleged AI influencer.
We need Ja Rule’s opinion on this. Has anyone asked him?
WHERES JA?!
I don’t think learning how to use. AI is going to save their job. Because AI will do their job there’s nothing for them to do. I’m not saying it right. I’m just saying I don’t think her advice is right.
Attack the problem not one another.
I understand advocating for women but this is a worker VRs the rich problem. Not a woman, bend so you can get a job problem.
