• Speiser0@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 minutes ago

    In german when the sun sets, we say “die Sonne geht unter” (the sun goes below / the sun sinks). And for doomsday we say “die Welt geht unter” (the world goes below). What we’re seeing here is doomsday.

  • GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    “Earthset.” Fuck, that would be such a cool title for a sci-fi novel. I’m sure someone else has taken it already, but still, it’s such a cool word.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I couldn’t find one, surprisingly. At least no popular title. However, there is an Asimov short Earthset and Evening Star, I could find no reasonable sources to preview the story.

      So the title might be up for grabs as a story. Maybe a trilogy beginning with Earthrise, Earth(?) born?, Earthset in the end.

  • tahoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The fact that this is just a handheld iPhone video and not a professionally shot thing makes it so much more surreal

  • jaaake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Judging from first few seconds of this, I expected Cylon Raiders to come screaming across the horizon.

  • gnufuu@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I 🧑‍🦲 am happy 😊 that you 🫵 put these emojis 😐, otherwise I 🧑‍🦲 wouldn’t have understood 🤷

        • AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          48 minutes ago

          👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶👶🗿

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I still don’t understand this use of emoji.

      It’s not “I shoved a 🌵 up my 🍆”, I could get that, reject alphabet return to pictogram for the sake of compression if nothing else. But no, it’s “I shoved a cactus 🌵 up my dick 🍆” which is just…why are we doing this?

      • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Emojis are great when you want to convey tone or emotion that you normally can’t do through text alone. I find them especially useful when a sentence as-is sounds a lot colder than you actually mean it to be

        Obviously not the intention of OP and it’s definitely excessive IMO but I do also find that they can be useful markers for longer texts. It gets a lot of hate but I find emojis really useful in codebase READMEs since you can quickly scan through and pick out the bits if information you’re looking for

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Having grown up chatting with friends and hitting on chicks via MSN messenger, I’m aware. "I’m gonna get you for that 😡 " and "I’m gonna get you for that 😜 " are two different messages.

          I will allege that emoji are badly suited to that task though. First, there are too many emoji. Even just the facial expressions, there are dozens of them. Second, they aren’t designed to parse to emotions, they’re designed to parse to facial expressions. Many of which are specific to Japanese culture. Third, they’re rendered kinda tiny in a lot of fonts. With a font size and screen zoom level set where I can comfortably read text, many emoji are just…yellow circles. Or little blobs of color that I have to bring the screen much closer to my face to make out than the raw text.

          Emoticons did the job better with less. But, entropy ruins all.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It’s only compressing the message visually (it generally uses more data)

        Also, at least for me, it takes more work to parse the images than words require. I have to like… shift out of reading mode, comprehend the image and then go back to reading.

            • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Than an entire word?

              Take “cactus” for example. Each letter in the word “cactus” is one unicode character, for a total of six. 🌵 is one unicode character, U+1F335.

              Unicode characters are 4 bytes long, so “cactus” takes 24 bytes to transmit, where “🌵” takes 4. Unless something something UTF_8?

              • onlyhalfminotaur@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                29 minutes ago

                You’re close, Unicode characters don’t imply a number of bytes, it’s how they’re encoded that does (utf-8 most commonly). Utf-8 can be as little as one byte or as many as four, depending on the specific character. I don’t know about emojis but I imagine they’re in the four bytes section. Whereas “asdf” is also four bytes in utf-8.

                • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 minutes ago

                  So I just looked it up, the UTF-8 encoding for the cactus emoji is 4 bytes long: 0xF0 0x9F 0x8C 0xB5

                  Where the Latin alphabet is in the 1-byte region.

                  So it takes 6 bytes to transmit “cactus” in UTF-8, and only 4 to transmit “🌵”. So any emoji that replaces 5 or more letters is more efficient. 🍆 breaks even with “dick” or “cock”, more efficient than “penis”, more than twice as compact as “eggplant” or “aubergine”.

                • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  20 minutes ago

                  Yes, to be clear I meant the example I gave where the word was replaced with the emoji was compression, not where they give the word and its emoji. That’s as long-handed as possible.

  • Quokka@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Does this make them the first people to never see the Earth?

  • Big_Boss_77@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    18 hours ago

    What goes through your mind at that point? Like… the train of thought at that point had to be just wild.