• reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    46 minutes ago

    they should make another mailing list for ai generated reports that they totally read, and ban anyone who submits slop to the main one. not sure how feasible it is since spammers will just generate new emails, but at least they would have something clear to point out the malicious intent.

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m just imagining a bunch of sweaties telling people they work for Linux as a cybersec expert, burning through $300 of tokens a day.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      For which they haven’t yet paid a single penny, because AI corpos need people to get addicted to their products.

  • ryannathans@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Email systems and mailing lists are antiquated. Dumb behaviours make management of the system even harder.

    • febra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      As someone who has actually contributed to the linux kernel I think the kernel maintainers are doing a great job. Mailing lists work just fine.

      • ryannathans@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Nobody said kernel maintainers aren’t doing a great job

        Mailing lists work. Working fine would not be having these articles

        I’m saying other hypothetical systems would work better

        • astropenguin5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          58 minutes ago

          Well they worked fine until AI flooded the system. Any hypothetical system would still have that much traffic and be very hard to manage processing all that information on a human level.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I agree with you. It makes interacting with Linux kernel development tedious and I think they like it that way.

      It falls apart pretty quick when they reach a certain size which is what ai posts increase the chance of.

      Still it has the advantages of being decentralized which keeps it off things like GitHub issues which is probably for the better.

      • Benaaasaaas@group.lt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        You’re putting this like llm spam is somehow a managed problem in github issues, where it’s very much the same overwhelmed system with no good solution.

      • ryannathans@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        It’s not though, hence this issue. Moderation, organisation and management tools are lacking because it’s email

        • realitista@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          There are many such tools for email groups, and for the included audience, whipping up exactly what was needed for the job would be a pretty trivial task.

      • ryannathans@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I think it’s time the Linux maintainers put their heads together and come up with a decentralised tool for managing these issues much in the same way git was created for managing the source code of Linux

        • CameronDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Git was created because one of those developers actually had a problem. The fact that they haven’t tried to replace the mailing list yet suggests they don’t actually have a problem with it.

          • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Linus always praises email. He does no social media and most of his internet usage is just email is what I gather from his conversations and interviews.

            • CameronDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              There are a few thousand other developers, any one of them could start working on a replacement if it bothered them enough. Granted, a lot of them will be grey beards who are happy with mailing lists, but still, the overall friction hasn’t pushed them far enough over the edge to replace it.

            • CameronDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 hours ago

              The problem highlighted by this article is the flood of slop. The mailing list is almost irrelevant, because regardless of whatever alternative you use, the flood of slop will still keep overwhelming it.

              • ryannathans@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Emails don’t allow merging threads very easily. The issue is lots of duplicates. Other tools would increase the capability to handle the popularity