• X@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    164
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Per the article:

    The sample was collected on April 7. Eurofins issued its results on April 10. According to the lab report, the 24-hour composite found:

    • Hexavalent chromium at 0.0104 milligrams per liter, just above the lab’s reporting limit of 0.01 mg/L. Hexavalent chromium is classified as a known human carcinogen by the US National Toxicology Program. It is the substance the Erin Brockovich case was built around.

    • Arsenic at 0.0025 mg/L. That is below the federal drinking water standard of 0.01 mg/L, but present.

    • Strontium at 1.17 mg/L. Mazloum’s technical report on the findings noted that long-term exposure can affect bone density and kidney function in humans and wildlife.

    • Lithium and vanadium at concentrations Lazarte’s letter described as abnormally high relative to rainwater or normal groundwater.

    • Elevated levels of manganese, iron, phosphorus, calcium, magnesium and potassium consistent with industrial discharge. Manganese, a battery process tracer, can have neurological effects at chronic doses. Excess phosphorus can cause algae blooms that strip oxygen from waterways.

    • Ammonia in the form of nitrogen at 1.68 mg/L, amplifying the algae bloom risk

    • hissing meerkat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s a suspiciously low level of arsenic. Where is the arsenic from their wells or municipal water ending up or are they clandestinely pumping river water?

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 day ago

        It can. But you’d need a facility built to do it.

        If you don’t anticipate Strontium in your wastewater, you’re not going to build a system to leech it out or neutralize it.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Isn’t that the important part of the story? Effing Texas regulators didn’t detect Strontium (or other pollutants the factory didn’t mention) so didn’t test for it?

          We’re so used to the idea that companies will do the least they are mandated to, but isn’t that why we have regulators? If I get a new water heater I’m required to have an inspector sign off and his job is to flag anything that is off. Why can’t a multibillion dollar industrial facility be held to the same standard?

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Effing Texas regulators didn’t detect Strontium (or other pollutants the factory didn’t mention) so didn’t test for it?

            I mean, they did. That’s how we know about it. But what can they actually do about it? Prince Abbott will just cover this up and fire anyone who won’t shut up about it.

            • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              It was an independent lab that tested it because the ditch owners thought something was wrong. Tesla claims they also measured it incorrectly, but you can’t really dispute the color coming out, so something is in it.

              Even if they did measure it incorrectly though, it’s going to be hard to dispute the lithium fingerprint they found, it would only be the other chemicals that become questionable. Seems like such a simple answer is to re-test it and re-test it immediately, and put them under extended re-testing scrutiny if the re-test comes back clean (maybe they changed something to fake the new test). Also re-test where the “incorrect” test was done to see if it gets similar results there as well. It’s not even pocket change to Tesla, it’s like a piece of lint in the pocket that a penny has touched change.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 hour ago

                It was an independent lab that tested it

                It was a public drainage district - specifically, Nueces County Drainage District No. 2 - that requested the lab be performed. These are municipal offices within the structure of the County that stumbled on a pipe authorized by the state and misused by Tesla’s facilities.

                This is effectively a dispute between the county and the state, wherein the state has authorized dumping it should not have the legal authority to provide.

            • towerful@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              If a discharge pipe is traced back to a company - and it is discharging unsafe levels or typically unexpected chemicals - then it should be on that company to get their waste water into a manageable condition.

              Just because a municipal/council/whatever has above average water processing, doesn’t mean companies get a free pass to abuse it