• roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 months ago

    I love that its still going and telling stories, but an incredibly grindy free to play game is a tough sell for a lot of people.

    • ValueSubtracted@startrek.websiteOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      YMMV, but I think it’s pretty light on grinding. I log in for maybe 10-20 minutes a day, and am able to keep up with whatever events are going on just fine. The story episodes are much longer, but you can go through those at your own pace easily enough.

      As for the stuff in the article about the game being a little dated and clunky after all these years…that’s a big “yup” from me.

  • _NetNomad@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    oh yeah? if STO is so good, does it support the Super Action Controller?

    Coleco Super Action Controller

    Star Trek Strategic Operations Simulator for the ColecoVision stays winning

  • homes@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Every once in a while, I forget that this game is out there, and then I actually have it installed on my computer. Then I open it up, I give it a good play, and I remember that it’s actually a pretty good game.

  • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t like Star Trek Online because it’s all phasers and photon torpedos. I want to play a Star Trek game about exploring and debating philosophy.

    • James R Kirk@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      “Hey Grok, in the Holmesian style, create a mystery to confound Data with an opponent who has the ability to defeat him…”

  • BrightCandle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I really wish the ground combat was better or entirely ignorable because its not as good as the space ship combat aspects of the game.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I jumped on the bandwagon when it first came out, found some stuff interesting, but yeah, the ground aspect didn’t work for me. Probably didn’t help that everyone was doing the same stuff, so there were lines to scan and collect and whatever. Didn’t feel like a real away mission. Might be better with age, since much fewer would be in one place.

      I think for the ships I was expecting more like Starfleet Command, which was not realistic for an online version.

  • thejoker954@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    It really needs a new engine. Space combat is good, but it could be much better if you could move more freely. And the scale of things (especially on the ground) is way off.

    Ground combat sucks.

    The stories are good to great though. It’s definitely a labor of love for a lot of the devs over at Cryptic.

    • ValueSubtracted@startrek.websiteOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      In the newer content, things are scaled up to about 150% of normal size, which seems to me like a pretty good balance between accuracy and playability.

      The older content? Not so much…