Delaware Superior Court Judge Craig Karsnitz said the beach town of Fenwick Island was not diluting human votes by allowing companies ​and other legal entities that own property to cast votes in municipal elections.

The American Civil Liberties Union ​of Delaware sued the town, arguing it violated the elections clause of the state ⁠constitution. The group sought a court order blocking Fenwick Island from counting votes by “non-human artificial entities” in future elections.

The ​group said entities make up about 12% of registered voters in the town.

A lawyer for the organization did ​not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The town’s mayor, Natalie Magdeburger, did not immediately respond to a request for comment but told Reuters in March that the city believes “a property owner who pays taxes and is subject to our ordinances should ​have a say in who represents them on our Town Council.”

  • Major_Tsiom@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Individuals have to claim primary residence somewhere and that is where they are eligible to vote. Corporations are composed of individuals who can vote in their home towns/states. Nowhere is it written that corporations have to be democratic in any way, so a corporation very well may (probably will!) be just be a second vote for the highest ranking individual within. It’s obvious bullshit that should not be tolerated. Are we fucking blind?

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      No but that judge probably got a nice bonus for the ruling.

      Edit: this is a logical consequence of Citizens United. Which makes it no less fucked in the head.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        No but that judge probably got a nice bonus for the ruling.

        Sir, I am offended! There is no way this official received a bonus or bribe of any kind before the ruling. That would be unethical!

        This officer received his payment after the ruling was made. That makes it a gratuity, which is acceptable, according to no less an authority than Brett Kavanaugh.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The federal government provides minimums for voting, but they’ve never tried providing a maximum requirement until Trump. A state, in theory, could allow various kinds of non-humans from voting.

      It is part of the reason why national elections are based on state population, not number of voters.