slothrop @lemmy.ca to Political Memes@lemmy.caEnglish · 2 months agogoing undergroundlemmy.caimagemessage-square129fedilinkarrow-up1685arrow-down110file-text
arrow-up1675arrow-down1imagegoing undergroundlemmy.caslothrop @lemmy.ca to Political Memes@lemmy.caEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square129fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaremushroommunk@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up18·2 months agoThey’re already working on that
minus-squareBooBees@fedinsfw.applinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down1·2 months agoAre those things emp proof?
minus-squareElting@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·edit-22 months agoSeems like a well thrown bucket of paint would probably disable those things.
minus-squareBooBees@fedinsfw.applinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 months agoHave you seen the price of paint lately? Mud might be the better option. From the bottom of a latrine.
minus-squareRicky Rigatoni@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·2 months agoDon’t even need an emp they probably go down with .22
minus-squaremushroommunk@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 months agoI would expect them to be. It seems like a very obvious flaw if not. Though with hubris more obvious things have been ignored before
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 months agoThey are very much not. They are not actually intended for military combat - more like retrofitted for it.
minus-squareTachyonTele@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoThat’s the pr line the robotics company says. While mysteriously also having government contracts
minus-squareTrackinDaKraken@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoDrones will be banned soon, so if you have any ideas in that area, you should stock up.
minus-squareHikingVet@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months agoBuck shot, pit traps, or just cages will be lower tech solutions
minus-squareDaddleDew@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 months agoIf I’ve learned anything from robot combat shows is that robots can’t deal with any entanglement device like strings and nets.
minus-squareWiddershins@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoYou can build a net gun out of PVC, a sprinkler valve, an air gun nozzle, and a net.
minus-squareDaddleDew@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoOr just get close to it and throw the net on it. It’s not like they’re going to bite you. They’re mobile surveillance cameras.
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoYup, classic cartoon-style rope snare would make short work of them.
minus-squareDaftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months ago$300,000 robot dog vs hole with blanket over it.
minus-squareBig_Boss_77@fedinsfw.applinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoI’ve always heard that the ceramic on spark plugs, when smashed to manageable pieces, makes excellent material for destroying electronics when propelled by a 12g round. Never tried it though…kind of curious.
minus-squareBooBees@fedinsfw.applinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoWe called those ninja rocks when I was a kid. They break car windows really really well.
minus-squareApathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoRodeo skills gunna be back in fashion lol
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoBuilding a pulse seems difficult. Building something that can generate a pulse is manageable.
minus-squareDasFaultier@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoThe more important question is: are they very, VERY good boys who like belly scritches and fetching sticks?
minus-squareDasFaultier@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoShame. Maybe with a better firmware…
They’re already working on that
Are those things emp proof?
Seems like a well thrown bucket of paint would probably disable those things.
Have you seen the price of paint lately? Mud might be the better option. From the bottom of a latrine.
Resourceful!
Don’t even need an emp they probably go down with .22
I would expect them to be. It seems like a very obvious flaw if not. Though with hubris more obvious things have been ignored before
They are very much not. They are not actually intended for military combat - more like retrofitted for it.
That’s the pr line the robotics company says. While mysteriously also having government contracts
Drones will be banned soon, so if you have any ideas in that area, you should stock up.
Do you know how to build an EMP?
Buck shot, pit traps, or just cages will be lower tech solutions
If I’ve learned anything from robot combat shows is that robots can’t deal with any entanglement device like strings and nets.
You can build a net gun out of PVC, a sprinkler valve, an air gun nozzle, and a net.
Or just get close to it and throw the net on it. It’s not like they’re going to bite you. They’re mobile surveillance cameras.
Yup, classic cartoon-style rope snare would make short work of them.
$300,000 robot dog vs hole with blanket over it.
I’ve always heard that the ceramic on spark plugs, when smashed to manageable pieces, makes excellent material for destroying electronics when propelled by a 12g round.
Never tried it though…kind of curious.
We called those ninja rocks when I was a kid. They break car windows really really well.
Good to know lol
Rodeo skills gunna be back in fashion lol
Building a pulse seems difficult. Building something that can generate a pulse is manageable.
The more important question is: are they very, VERY good boys who like belly scritches and fetching sticks?
No.
Shame. Maybe with a better firmware…