mudkip@lemdro.id to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 hours ago123 + 456 = 123456files.catbox.moeimagemessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1207arrow-down133
arrow-up1174arrow-down1image123 + 456 = 123456files.catbox.moemudkip@lemdro.id to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 hours agomessage-square38fedilink
minus-squareslazer2au@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up128·11 hours agoJS devs are like yep, that’s clearly concatenation of 2 strings.
minus-squarezxqwas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up28·10 hours agoBut for some reason 456 + 123 = Null.
minus-squarefarmgineer@nord.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·9 hours agoI came to complain about JS and see that I was beat to the punch
minus-squareLucy :3@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up9·11 hours agoI mean everyone looking at that equation should think that
minus-squareslazer2au@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 hours agoCompared to a type safe language where it would be an equation rather then concatenation.
minus-squaremacniel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up8·11 hours agoOnly when the first statement is a string already would that result in a string concat.
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 hours agoThey are implied to both being strings. As such the first one already is a string. Neither is marked as such in a standard way though.
JS devs are like yep, that’s clearly concatenation of 2 strings.
But for some reason 456 + 123 = Null.
Wat
I came to complain about JS and see that I was beat to the punch
Mathematicians too
Gardeners too
I mean everyone looking at that equation should think that
Compared to a type safe language where it would be an equation rather then concatenation.
Only when the first statement is a string already would that result in a string concat.
They are implied to both being strings. As such the first one already is a string. Neither is marked as such in a standard way though.