• blarghly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Absolutely disagree. If I’m wearing a graphic t, I’d much rather the graphic be on the back. Graphic on the front feels trashy, ala 3 Wolf Moon.

    • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I’d rather have it in the back because sometimes the print feels stiff and uncomfortable and sometimes boobies stretch out the image.

      • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        My issue with the back is I have long hair so my hair will cover the design! But the front my tits will make that image…real real stretchy.

        Stupid human bodies!!

      • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        14 hours ago

        They’re always on and under my boobs too?? Like it would be one thing if it was on my chest but there’s a big open area of nothing with a design only on or under my boobs? I think they’re just not made with women in mind 90% of the time even when it’s sold in women’s sizes

    • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yeah if you’ve got shirt with a wolf but no dragon on it that is a weak design, everyone knows this.

    • stickly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Counterpoint, wearing a graphic on the back feels shallow and self-aggrandizing. You’re never going to get to see the graphic you like in a mirror; friends and acquaintances you interface with all day won’t see it. It’s only for the benefit of anonymous observers behind you that you’ll never meet and won’t think about you twice.

      It also is more antisocial. It’s natural to comment on a graphic when you’re face to face (pointing to chest, “oh you also like [Band]?”) and hard to broach a conversation from behind when they’re probably engaged with something else ("[Band]? Oh right, the shirt, yeah…").

      It’s possible to pull it off, but in general I’d rather see someone confidently rocking a 3 wolf moon shirt than an incredible print drifting down the street on some anonymous back.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It’s natural to comment on a graphic when you’re face to face

        This might be why I feel like front graphics are more trashy. You are picking a thing and putting it in peoples faces, and it feels like a stand in for actually saying something and expressing ones self. Versus on the back, it functions more as an out of the way vibe that supports the way you want others to see you, but still allows you the lions share of expression

        • stickly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Guess I don’t see it like that. To me both are serving the same function of fashion, but on the back is cheekily pretending it’s not and is therefore more disingenuous.

          I also have a strong bias toward aesthetic over statement. There’s no reason my T needs to “say” anything any more than a striped or patterned shirt needs to “say” anything. I can just like how it looks or compliments my outfit.

          I’m never going to wear some generic Coca-Cola or beer brand or “I speak sarcasm” shirt. If it’s an obvious legible statement (like a local band or charity) then that means it’s really important to me and I don’t mind looking like a trashy geek.