“Experts in Europe warn that these devices are used to record strangers without their consent, possibly breaching EU law.”

“A small LED light is designed to indicate when recording is taking place, but RTBF’s investigators found that tutorials explaining how to conceal the indicator are abundant and easily accessible online.”

Sometimes I have a hard time deciding who I despise more, parasite Mark Zuckerberg or its witless hosts who keep using its products—yes, Zuck’s pronoun is it. Ban Ray-Ban, for frick’s sake.

  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Because somehow those recordings being misused is less offensive than these recordings being misused.

    Honestly, the privacy aspect in public is completely out the window already. Anyone arguing that these are somehow worse than what already exists is either arguing in bad faith or misunderstands the current (previous?) state of things.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They’re not worse, but having yet another thing invading our privacy in public IS worse. No sense in giving up even more ground.

      • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        invading our privacy in public

        Stop and think about what you just said for a second. Privacy……in public. You have no privacy in public, those are opposites.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          41 minutes ago

          There’s degrees of privacy. People don’t deserve to be recorded 24/7 just because they happen to be outside.

          • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 minutes ago

            They don’t “deserve” to, but it is not illegal if they are. If you’re in a public space you shouldn’t expect privacy……because you’re in a public place. That’s pretty obvious.

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Difference being: we’re kind of powerless against government surveillance high up on a fence, but we can sanction the class traitor glassholes with an accidental elbow to the glasses and a clumsy step on them.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Seems like you’re giving a pass to government and corpos, while assaulting fellow citizens.

        I intend on getting whatever glasses eventually come out with an AR layer involved, camera or not. Doesn’t mean I’ll be constantly recording. In fact I’d likely almost never record anything.

        And apparently that means I deserve an elbow to the face.

        ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          No, I am not giving a pass to government and corpos. But people recording others in public are henchmen of the very same fascist governments and yes, you deserve an elbow to the face if you record ANYONE (in more detail than within a large group of pedestrians) in public EVER without their explicit consent. Because you are - at least in civilized countries - violating privacy laws with the expectation that no one will sue you for it.

          • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            You’ll find that in almost every civilised country recording in public is 100% allowed. It’s what you do with the footage that has restrictions and laws around it.

            Privacy in public is not a thing. They’re literally antonyms.

    • Miaou@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      What are you even talking about? How is being filmed not worse than not being filmed, privacy-wise?