• x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 minutes ago

      Not just spite. It also proves they profit more from proprietary repairs than it costs to maintaining both production lines.

    • ilickfrogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I have never and will never pay for a Nintendo product because of shit like this. Doesn’t mean you can’t play Nintendo games though 🏴‍☠️

      Fuck Nintendo.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      It’s the Apple approach: Implement consumer-friendly policies only in regions that require it by law. Apple mostly do it with software though, for example only allowing third-party app stores in EU and Japan.

      Plenty of US companies do something similar with subscriptions too. California mandates that any subscription you create online must also be cancellable online, and so some companies (like New York Times, SiriusXM, gyms) only show their simple online cancelation flow to Californians. Everyone else must jump through hoops like use live chat, call them, cancel in person, etc.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          45 minutes ago

          It’s probably cheaper to do the right thing. It’d allow them to have a single product line, rather than two. However, it’d mean they can’t screw over customers and sell them replacements, so it’d cost them in additional sales.

    • AeronMelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The midlife revision will probably just have a user-replaceable battery for all regions to simplify things.

      Then again, it’s Nintendo.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Nintendo makes the first version of all of their products deliberately mid just so the second version can be considered to be an upgrade, when everybody else would just consider the second version to be what they should have made from the beginning.

        It’s like the OLED switch, why didn’t they just make the first version OLED? There hasn’t been a significant cost reduction in that area lately, so it’s not as if it’s suddenly cheaper to put one in.