• IWW4@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    How can you not consider your all of your needs when buying a vehicle?

    • blitzen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      “Consider”, yes. But buy based on every need, no.

      I go skiing once per year. Should I buy a vehicle with all-wheel drive just to satisfy that one need? Of course not.

        • blitzen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Because much of the stated reason for EVs is the money you’ll save on fuel and maintenance costs, so spending extra money on something you’ll use once per year doesn’t fit the money saving narrative.

          Ultimately, what I and the other commenter is saying is a once a year “need” really isn’t a need at all. To further my example, if I lived in the snow or traveled there regularly, then AWD is likely a reasonable expense, but if very rarely used it would make more sense to rent/borrow. Same goes for a truck (for hauling), or gasoline car for the range.

          I drive an EV now and my next car will likely be an ICE AWD vehicle. But I’m also aware that it’s not the most economically sound decision and I’d be buying it for fun. Under no circumstances would I be justifying it by the longer range (which I very seldom need) or to travel to the snow.

            • blitzen@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Its your life man, feel free to sell yourself short at will.

              I am genuinely confused at this statement. How am I selling myself short and what is “at will” meant to mean?

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      One of the needs was not driving a huge ass truck for the 99% of trips where a smaller, more efficient car works so much better.

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You can rent a truck, but owning a truck means you have to pay more to haul around a bunch of stuff you don’t need. That’s why you shouldn’t be worried about every possible thing you might need a vehicle for.

        • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          If you haul multiple times a month, perfectly understandable. If you haul things once or twice a year, the $20 rental from your local hardware store is probably more than sufficient for the task. And significantly cheaper, too.

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            This is a good point. I’ve watched a lot of idiots ruining their vehicles hauling stuff from Home Depot when a truck is only $20.

          • ubergeek@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            What $20 rental?

            Those do not exist anymore.

            Truck rentals start at $50 now, when all fees are in.

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              How the hell are truck rentals so cheap in the US? Vans start at 70 euros here and I have to go the other side of the country because that’s where the airport is.

              I get most of my needs done with the much more easily available rental trailers instead. My wagon has a tow hitch for that.

              I am, however, considering an SUV and buying a bigger trailer of my own so I could put more than ~500 kilos on it as that’s the limit or the brake less rental trailers. I expect to do a bunch of hauling next few years, major home repairs are in order and I ain’t paying other people to do all of it for me. I’ll bring my own materials home from the shop and DHL my own work.

              • ubergeek@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                Its largely because of volume. They can keep every truck for moving pretty much on the road, all the time.

                Especially around the 1st of the month. You need to reserve at least a month out for a 1st of the month rental.

                Also, we accumulate loads of crap here. I surmise that’s less common in your area.

              • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 day ago

                Damn, it’s been a minute since I looked into it but that’s a lot more than it used to be and even furthers the point.

                • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  It’s literally less than you just said. $20 for a truck and no mileage charge.

                  You’re missing the forest for the trees anyway. The point is it’s a lot less to pay $20 a few times per year than it is to pay thousands more for a full sized truck instead of a car.

                  • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    How is $150 for a day less than $30 + (60miles x .50¢ a mile)??? You would need to go 240 miles for that to be more which even in my state is further than the next nearest Home Depot.

            • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Home Depot fucking sucks, then. Menard’s has a $0.50 per mile charge, $19 for 75 minutes, $6 for each additional 15 min

              The difference in price between a sedan and a truck is like $400-500 annually

              • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I can’t say I have heard of Menards but they sound the same as Home Depot, or worse maybe since Home Depot charges for the whole day last I checked.

              • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                If you live right next-door to the Home Depot then sure, if you live in a town like the one I grew up in and it has no Lowe’s or Home Depot or other car rental place even though it has 16,000 people and a college in it then no not at all.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s more over-weighting rare long road trips compared to everyday use. People are terrified of having to spend an extra 30 minutes charging an EV on a road trip, but don’t think about all the time they can save on a weekly basis by never having to go to a gas station, or never having to get oil changes, etc.

      • uuj8za@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        ¿Por qué no los dos? I own an EV for city driving, but I also own a gas car for road trips.

        having to spend an extra 30 minutes charging an EV on a road trip

        I’ve taken the EV on road trips a hand full of times and sometimes it was just 30 minutes. Other times, it was waaay longer than that because there were 5 charging stations, but, surprise, 2 of them are broken and the rest have long lines of cars waiting.

        Personally, I find those situations pretty stressful, so I don’t take the EV for road trips now.

        • ContriteErudite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Newer EVs use NACS, which opens up a huge number of fast DC chargers all across the interstate system. Unfortunately those chargers are almost all Tesla superchargers, and we all wish there was a less musky alternative out there.

          I’ve taken a road trip in the new NIssan Leaf, which has NACS. It wasn’t bad; we had to stop for ~30 minutes every ~300 miles, which lines up with just about how often my aging body needs to go pee these days…