• Gregers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    How the fuck do you come to the conclusion that breast milk is sexual? Is cow milk beastiality? Must be American or something to be so detached from nature and reality

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Not the milk itself. But this is exactly the same level, as mixing your sperm in ingredients. Pretty sure this also goes against all food safety regulations.

    • Luffy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Its still assault, even if not sexual.

      For those who don’t understand: there’s a difference between ownership and possession. You can own a car equipped with flamethrowers as anti theft measure, but when you make it trivial to trigger those without intention that matches your response, that would be assault.

      Same applies to coworkers just with allergies, the fact that thats not what stood on the label, etc

      You can’t burn a coworker alive because he mistook your car.

      • smh@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        TBD, we don’t know how the milk product was labeled. If it was in a glass jar labeled “Pamela’s milk, do not drink” would you still consider it assault if someone drank it?

        (I’ve brought nut milk to work for my coffee in glass jars before with the label “my name. date”. Would you consider it assault if someone with an almond allergy drank my white liquid, assuming it was cow milk?)

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Flamethrowers on a car are illegal, breastmilk in somebody’s personal creamer container is not