• Björn@swg-empire.de
    341·
    8 hours ago

    She’s just baffled that anyone who knows those two distributions could be so dense as to whittle down the vast infinite sea of possible options to just two incredibly boring ones. She would have cried next if he hadn’t done it.

    Also, OpenSUSE.

    • ☭SaltyIcetea☭@lemmy.ml
      11·
      6 hours ago

      well the vast majority of those are just arch and debian with extra steps, with the occasional fedora based or independent distro

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      5 hours ago

      Yep. Should be “Windows or Linux?”

      I know part of the joke is that it’s not this comparison--that asking “arch or debian” also rules out Windows--but it really is the important dividing line.

      • Funkt4st1c@lemmy.worldEnglish
        4·
        4 hours ago

        “Hammer to penis or steak” is less interesting than “Steak or lobster”

        Anyways the answer is Steak, and a different steak if its for a server, and lobster (derogatory) if its for an important server

      • pmk@piefed.caEnglish
        7·
        6 hours ago

        “Zealot” is relative to where you currently are. Mint -> Debian -> Arch -> FreeBSD -> OpenBSD -> Plan 9 -> TempleOS

          • pmk@piefed.caEnglish
            3·
            5 hours ago

            That’s actually what I’ve seen a lot! After a few years of tinkering with your system, the idea of something stable and polished is very appealing, so you can focus on getting things done.

            • tempest@lemmy.ca
              1·
              3 hours ago

              I run Arch on my personal machine and Debian on my server and honestly Debian gives me more issues.

              It doesn’t like zfs and Nvidia drivers are always a fight. Debian is still good though if all you want to run is a web server forever.

    • rumba@lemmy.zipEnglish
      3·
      4 hours ago

      SOLD!

      God that was a glorious OS.

      I was in sales around the time in between 2.1 and 4. Win 3 was the current and you could hardly multitask anything that wasn’t idle.

      I found out you could open a music video 9 times and tile it and it just worked (a little slow)

      I was all wtf are we even selling Windows, this is amazing.

      Then win95 hit, and it could do the same time.

      Microsoft had us put out a table with win95, I ran that exact demo with the Edie Brickell video from the install CD and copies flew off the floor.

      Funny thing, not like a single person there would ever do that, but that’s all they needed to see

    • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
      6·
      7 hours ago

      This is the way! Everything is based on Arch, Debian or Fedora anyway so you might as well stick to what is well known and supported.

        • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
          2·
          4 hours ago

          well known and supported 🤪

          From my understanding NixOS and Gentoo is “support it yourself”. I haven’t tried either of them so I could be completely wrong about that.

          • TwilightKiddy@scribe.disroot.orgEnglish
            2·
            4 hours ago

            It’s pretty much the same thing as everywhere, you have a bunch of lovely people who package and test things, nothing too weird. What you are describing is LFS.

            • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
              1·
              28 minutes ago

              I was under the impression that you had to compile everything yourself on Gentoo and in Nix that you have to mess with a config to do everything and anything.

              Maybe I should try them both to see what the fuzz is about.

              • TwilightKiddy@scribe.disroot.orgEnglish
                2·
                54 minutes ago

                Speaking about Gentoo, you don’t “have to” compile everything, but let’s just say it’s strongly encouraged. Most of the compilation is automated though, think AUR on steroids. If you don’t want to touch anything, you can go with defaults for all the software and you’ll get basically what you get on any other distro.

                The thing is, though, if you are not being a little funny with your software, why the hell are you running Gentoo? So, it’s entirely optional, but it’s the main reason one would use Gentoo, otherwise you get a stock standard system with stupidly long updates.

                I can’t speak for Nix, though, I haven’t touched it myself, but from what I know from those around me running it, it’s pretty much the same thing, unless you want something cool, you don’t have to suffer.

                • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
                  1·
                  22 minutes ago

                  Okey thank you so much for the information! I can see the appeal. More freedom and customization. I am all for it.

                  But for my use cases I think Arch is enough. It strikes a nice balance with official packages and the AUR and I love that you get to choose all of the packages you want to have installed.

        • tal@lemmy.todayEnglish
          9·
          7 hours ago

          She went for him in late 1993:

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linus_Torvalds

          Linus Torvalds is married to Tove Torvalds (née Monni), a six-time Finnish national karate champion, whom he met in late 1993. He was running introductory computer laboratory exercises for students and instructed the course attendees to send him an e-mail as a test, to which Tove responded with an e-mail asking for a date.

          Fedora won’t have been around.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fedora_Linux

          Fedora Linux[10] is a Linux distribution developed by the Fedora Project. It was originally developed in 2003 as a continuation of the Red Hat Linux project.

          It looks like there were Linux distributions at the time, but they were very early:

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution

          Early distributions included:

          • Torvalds’ “Boot-Root” images, from v0.95a onwards “Root” was maintained by Jim Winstead Jr., the aforementioned disk image pair with the kernel and the absolute minimal tools to get started (0.10: 4 November 1991)[12][13][14][15]

          • MCC Interim Linux (3 March 1992)[16]

          • TAMU Linux, based on MCC with simpler installation and X11 (14 July 1992)[17]

          • Softlanding Linux System (SLS) which included the X Window System and was the most comprehensive distribution for a short time (15 August 1992)[18]

          • H.J. Lu’s “bootable rootdisks” (23 September 1992),[19][20] and “Linux Base System” (5 October 1992)[21][22]

          • Yggdrasil Linux/GNU/X, a commercial distribution (alpha: 8 December 1992)

          • The two oldest, still active distribution projects started in 1993. The SLS distribution was not well maintained, so in July 1993 a new SLS-based distribution, Slackware, was released by Patrick Volkerding.[23] Also dissatisfied with SLS, Ian Murdock set to create a free distribution by founding Debian in August 1993, with first public BETA released in January 1994 and first stable version in June 1996.[24][25]

          I think that there are two possible takeaways from this:

          • Not clear what distro was used — if any — but if it was, it won’t have been a presently existing one. It’s possible that he was just rolling his own setup, not using a distro at all.

          • Linus’s date with Tove derived from an email exchange. What ninja chicks look for in a guy is possibly an email client, not a Linux distribution at all. It sounds like Linus was probably using Pine at the time (though someone could go dig up mail headers from old emails to check).