nifty@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 年前Look at hiiimlemmy.worldimagemessage-square202fedilinkarrow-up1900arrow-down144file-text
arrow-up1856arrow-down1imageLook at hiiimlemmy.worldnifty@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square202fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareUltraviolet@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·edit-21 年前Miles or kilometers per hour makes sense in the context of travel, you can very easily estimate how long it’s going to take to get somewhere.
minus-squarecalcopiritus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 年前Ironically, km/h is better for estimation because hours are 3600 seconds. If an hour were 1000 seconds or whatever, it would barely take more effort to calculate with m/s
minus-squarepHr34kY@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 年前I was thinking about estimating stopping distances and reaction times. The number of metres you cover every second becomes important then.
Miles or kilometers per hour makes sense in the context of travel, you can very easily estimate how long it’s going to take to get somewhere.
Ironically, km/h is better for estimation because hours are 3600 seconds. If an hour were 1000 seconds or whatever, it would barely take more effort to calculate with m/s
I was thinking about estimating stopping distances and reaction times. The number of metres you cover every second becomes important then.