Source

alt-text

I can’t believe a paid OS needs a tool like this. Here’s a GUI tool called OFGB (Oh Frick Go Back) to remove all the ads in Windows 11. It’s understandable if a free OS or app needs ad support, but this is just crazy github.com/xM4ddy/OFGB

[Screenshot Of a GUI Tool To Removes Ads From Various Places Around Windows 11]

  • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Conditioning everyone to see their computers as media consumption kiosks instead of the powerful, productive machines they are. That’s where MS OSes are headed. They tried too early with Windows 8 Metro, but they haven’t lost sight of that concept.

    “My TV shows ads so it’s only natural my computer does too.” - I bet a lot of people already think like this.

    • db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty soon it’ll want to use your idle cpu net and disk for undisclosed purposes as part of the EULA.

      • The Telemetry collection service does a good job of that already, especially on laptops where it wakes them from sleep, and eats through the battery while idle in a backpack. I’ve been stung by this many times since Windows 8 - I now unplug then hibernate my last remaining Windows laptop, work-issued.

        Also moved as much personal gear as possible over to various Linux distros a while ago, except my PC where some games cannot detect my sim peripherals & freetrack emulation under WINE

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty insightful, and quite possible as people are being trained on the “app experience” vs computing proper.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I want to make a script for Linux that adds ads everywhere. It would be tricky with Wayland but not impossible. It could start by installing browser extensions.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If its pre-installed, its typically called “Bloatware”.

      And I remember having bloatware on my machine going back to the 90s. The first really high quality gaming computer I got was a Sony Vaio and it had tons of bullshit excess software I had to mop out of it before I was ready to really use it.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is it actually malicious, though? Ads by themselves aren’t malicious.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      When it’s against the law to not maximize profit for shareholders we get into some really disgusting territory when you can’t innovate anymore and need to squeeze every dime out of everything.

      What the hell is microsuck going to do in another 10 years? Infinite growth is more of a fantasy than working Communism yet we swear it will work somehow…

  • Mensh123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    If only they knew how badly recived ads are inside of a free OS and how careful KDE’s devs had to be to ask for donations once a year in a permanently dismissable standard system notification.

    • CCF_100@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It boggles my mind how many Windows users refuse to switch to something else and insist on patching together Microsoft’s intentionally broken excuse of an operating system…

      • z00s@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sometimes you don’t know how bad your ex really is until you’re in a new relationship

      • BigPotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The usual, I would but games (and proprietary software for work)

        I run a Linux machine literally next to my Windows desktop and yeah it’s 98% for my daily usually but that’s still a week worth of “Not working” for my year.

        Fallout 3 was hard enough to get working on Windows many moons ago but even with all the “Use Lutris” or “Use Heroic” cries, it’d be easier to run a whole Windows VM than to get it running natively and in the forty minutes of time I have to game, I’d rather just play the game sometimes.

        So, if I have to play in their Sandbox, I’m gonna shit in it first so they don’t try to come play too.

        Plus, VR and all that.

      • K0W4L5K1@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lol right I saw a post about tiny11 iso I was like wtf thats way harder then just installing linux. Microsoft got people brainwashed

    • drislands@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love Linux as much as the next guy, but installing a new OS is not easier than downloading a single program and clicking check boxes. No need to be hyperbolic, Windows is bad enough as it is.

      • K0W4L5K1@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah it is easier dude. with windows you have to install the new OS and then open edge and download Firefox then go download the program and check the boxes. With linux mint you install the OS. Idk sounds easier to me

        • drislands@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, that’s fair. I thought you meant easier to install Linux over an existing Windows 11 install.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe, but Windows has the advantage of being preinstalled on the hardware most people are buying (meaning they get to skip the install the OS step for Windows).

          • K0W4L5K1@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I wouldn’t call forced adoption an advantage. if anything they are taking away your freedom of choice by making it harder for you to switch, Because you have to remove the windows OS to switch. Why dont you get the option for linux at the store they are open source licensed so there is no issue distributing for free and giving people the option.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      the more you use the native implementations of stuff, the more you see it. if you for example, dont use edge, dont use the native task bar/start bar, dont use the microsoft store, dont use any of the built in AI tools, then AD visibily would be minimal.

      A good chuck of the Ad problems is usually fixed by using 3rd party software, be it completely switching OS, or using non native software.

      its like trying to use old internet explorer and complaining about ads, when 3rd party alternatives exist, and of the subset who complains, a chunk refuse to get off IE, and look for ways to mod IE instead of just going 3rd party from the get go.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean not using the native taskbar is a bit further than fixing stuff by using third party software. The taskbar is an integral part of the OS. If you’re switching it out then you’re making significant, deep rooted changes to the OS.

        • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          its less rewriting the entire task bar, but overriding the functionalities of the start button (in which most of the Ads are displayed in)

    • Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s kind of embarrassing to see so many linux nerds talk about ads in Windows 11, like navigating the settings menu is difficult.

      I use linux and Windows. I haven’t seen an ad in windows since i installed and disabled them.

      • spacesatan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        1: you shouldn’t have to

        2: you have to go to like 6 different places to get most of them and there are still ads for microsoft products baked into the settings menu

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s embarrassing to see people actively defending the wealthiest corporation in the world baking ads directly into your operating system.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It isn’t hard but it is tedious because each of the ad settings is in a different location. Like taskbar has its settings which aren’t configured in the Settings app where you can turn off the ads. Settings has places in search and another in privacy. Look at the OP image. It’s 9 different settings that need to be found and turned off.

        • Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          9 settings all easily accessible via the search bar in settings.

          Idk im not seeing the absolutely gigantic issue that anti-windows people make it out to be - at worst, it’s a minor nuisance.

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The issue is ads are for supporting free software. Windows is not free therefore should not be showing ads.

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    How the heck did those tools developers figure out how to remove those various ads in windows? Did they do it the hard way, fired up a debugger to reverse engineer how those ads were displayed? That takes some dedication. We in the Linux land have it easy because the source code is available to mess with.

    • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not difficult. Corporations won’t put up with this shit and MS knows it, so there are (almost) always documented registry entries or GPO policies you can set to disable this crap.

      But you shouldn’t fucking have to. Which is why I’m now on Tumbleweed instead of Windows for my daily driver.

    • Murdoc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that it’s one of the benefits of monopoly. People don’t think “I wonder if I should start checking out alternatives?” but instead “Damn, that’s annoying. I wonder if there’s a way to fix this?” Alternatives never even enter their head. See, there’s already a tool for the problem in the post!

  • TheHooligan95@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Look, I agree, but let’s not kid ourselves on our experience not being shitty too 🤣. We’re capable of using it only because we’re really good at computers, but there are literally millions of people who don’t even know or care about knowing how to change desktop background

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      there are literally millions of people who don’t even know or care about knowing how to change desktop background

      I’ll cede “know”, but I heavily dispute “care”.

      Plenty of Boomers are painfully aware of how awful the internet has become over the last decade. Hell, they got to experience it before the rest of us precisely because folks who never knew how to migrate off AOL or Yahoo got enshitified first.

      My own mom hates using the computer in no small part because she takes too much of what she sees at face value and ends up with tons of spyware, bloat, and scams rampaging across her laptop. I have to clean it out for her every few months, and I’m constantly fighting with her over what’s actually garbage and what she’s convinced she needs.

      But the end result is that she just… won’t check her email because she hates it. She won’t answer her phone because she’s afraid of scam callers. She won’t trust ANY website, so she doesn’t use Amazon or Uber or Netflix.

      It isn’t that people like my mom don’t care. They care immensely, because modern technology has become unusable for people like her.

    • Heartwotalk@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not too bad. They probably wouldn’t have Windows either if they had to set it up themselves. My dad has been using Ubuntu for years, but he doesn’t know it. It’s just a laptop that works as far as he’s concerned.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would argue there are facets to many people’s life that they leave “at default” because they “don’t care enough to fix it how they want”.

      Take random Linux User XYZ; They still have to nudge their front door to get it open after unlocking, because they’re not a home improvement afficionado that wants to look up door repair videos on YouTube and attempt to put a stabilizer of some kind on the hinge. Or, they might accept the terrible interface in their car because they don’t know of easy ways to get it replaced with something simpler. Or, they don’t have their money invested anywhere because they don’t like/trust researching investment tips.

      For us, it’s just that computers are something we’ll always tune to our preference. For others, it’s other things.

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just saw a post the other day from a guy who dumped fedora because it couldn’t be installed with a Bluetooth mouse.

      Allegedly the installer requires a mouse click, and he had no other pointing device. They also said the keyboard navigation was not helpful and was also unable to switch to a console to manually pair his mouse.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it might be possible to get around all their menus with just tab and enter, but it’s less of a pain with a mouse last I tried.

        He’s right, the installer should either make mice work or have a GUI that doesn’t expect them.

  • Veraxus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you absolutely MUST use Windows, use it with AtlasOS.

    Otherwise, Debian w/ KDE Plasma is your panacea.

  • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I have never seen an ad. I’ve not put any effort into debloat. It’s this all just bs?

    Edit: Plenty of down votes for asking a question. Great community guys.

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Perhaps you just have a different view on what is or is not an ad. For example when I see a link in the start menu for an app that I did not install, I consider that to be an ad. The most common time this happens is for Office. (Or Microsoft 365 or whatever it is called now.) Also, when I see a ‘suggestion’ to sign into a Microsoft account to use OneDrive - I consider that an ad. Microsoft aren’t telling me about OneDrive to improve my life. They are telling me to improve their profits. And when I type something in the start menu to launch an app, any result that comes up that is not something I put on my computer is an ad. It often will suggest particular websites for example.

      These are the kinds of thing that we’re talking about. I’m sure if you’re using Windows on a home computer you will have seen these things. (I assume you’re talking about ads in Windows. It would be quite something else if you’d never seen any ad anywhere.)

      • Bob@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is my start menu in Windows 11, so I’m also curious about all the hubbub. I will admit I had to get rid of a load of unwanted links when I first got the computer but I’ve never seen adverts beyond that and that it suggests Microsoft Edge in certain contexts.