Ford and GM are probably regretting that switch to NACS…

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Jesus when are stockholders going to realize what he’s like at the helm and kick him out of CEO? This is the first thing I’ve heard about Musk doing anything with Tesla since Twitter happened. How do stockholders trust this man. Throwing away everything about him, this is an absent CEO who learned about one project that everyone was watching, he comes in, kicks down the door, and first response is to fire the whole team. To me, that says “this company is a shitshow”

    • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      There is one stockholder that has tried multiple times. The issue is the whole Tesla board are all his cronies, and a large portion of stockholders have bought into the cult of personality

        • anlumo@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s the confidence with which he sprouts his nonsense. People flock to confident personalities, because they must know a lot of things (presumably).

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s the weird magic of leftist reality: Elon Musk of all people has a cult of personality. The man is the most boring person I’ve ever heard speak, ever, and yet somehow he’s just coasting on this “cult of personality”.

          Either he’s breaking all the molds, or there was no mold to begin with.

          • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.orgOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Musk isn’t left though? He is very far right. He gained popularity by keeping quiet (at first) and doing stuff like promising not to sue companies that use their patents, and developing a ton of EV infrastructure. Turns out he couldn’t keep his mouth shut and is also just a rich asshole. But a lot of people bought in early and made loving Elon a personality trait. So here we are

  • Midnitte@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ford and GM are probably regretting that switch to NACS…

    Why? For one, Ford has scaled back it’s EV transition in favor of hybrids now, and two, there’s now a bunch of engineers looking for a job and charging sites up for grabs

    • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      With this move Tesla effectively gave up on the $7.5 billion package from the us government to build new infrastructure. Since it was paid with private money, it doesn’t require to be nationalized. It’s also accessible to anyone, with prices that are reasonable

      Also, I don’t know how efficient is the government in the usa, but in my country the chargers built by the semi-nationalized electric company are almost always broken because they don’t really care about profits, they have the unlimited government budget, so what’s the issue if a charger breaks and gets fixed after 2 years, making zero revenue during that time?

  • Nighed@sffa.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I really want to see the email/message exchange preceding some of these changes at twitter/Tesla.

    Is there any pushback/discussion any more, or does Elon just say jump and entire departments vanish?

    • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      There are rumors that this was an emotional decision from muskrat, and they will probably be offered their jobs back. Just rumors, but still would not be surprising

      • thejml@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Who would take them? I mean, I guess you gotta get paid, but when someone demonstrated that they can just drop you with zero warning, trust is negative at that point.

        • anlumo@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’d rejoin for double the wage I previously had. Need to build up an emergency fund for this precarious position.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        One article I read said he likes to fire whole teams and then see which people are asked about. Those are the ones he rehires. If nobody misses you then you were doing a job of value.

        From a human level, this is just shitty. It isn’t the way to treat people.

        • anlumo@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s not how research & development works. Nobody asks for a specific person there. Stuff just doesn’t get done.

        • beefcat@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          it’s also not a good way of actually figuring out who is critical.

          you can have people who keep the lights on and if they do their job right few even notice they exist.