cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/35971063

Pope Leo said “we’re in big trouble” when it comes to the ever-widening pay gap between the rich and poor, citing Elon Musk, who may be on course to become the world’s first trillionaire.

Leo made the remarks while criticising executive pay packages during his first interview with the media.

Reflecting on why the world was so polarised, he said one significant factor was the “continuously wider gap between the income levels of the working class and the money that the wealthiest receive”.

“CEOs that 60 years ago might have been making four to six times more than what the workers are receiving … 600 times more [now],” the pontiff said in excerpts of the interview conducted by Elise Ann Allen, a senior correspondent with the Catholic newspaper Crux as part of a forthcoming biography.

Earlier this month, the board of the electric car maker Tesla said it had proposed a new trillion-dollar pay package for Musk, its chief executive and largest shareholder, if he hit targets set by the company.

Outlining the incentive package, which is unprecedented in corporate history, in a stock market update, the company said: “Yes, you read that correctly.”

The pope, who turned 70 on Sunday, has so far shown to be much more low-key than his predecessor, even if they shared similar progressive political views.

Francis often clashed with the US president, Donald Trump, over his hardline immigration policies, while Leo, formerly Cardinal Robert Prevost, also criticised Trump’s policies on his X account before becoming pope.

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    21 hours ago

    The good news is that the payout depends on milestones, and Elon Musk has never once met an investor’s or government contract’s milestone.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      20 hours ago

      “CEOs that 60 years ago might have been making four to six times more than what the workers are receiving … 600 times more [now],” the pontiff [said]

      I hate to match check the Pope here, but this isn’t 600 times anymore. We’re talking 6 MILLION times more.

      Humans have a hard enough time comprehending a billion. A trillion is even harder.

        • Hector@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          You pretty much have to be a millionaire to afford all of the things our parents and grandparents got on Modest wages. Doctors and dentists and optometrists, house repairs and or skyrocketing rent.

          Of course a million dollars is nowhere near enough to pay for medical treatment that used to cost a modest amount of your wealth. $1 million would be nowhere near enough to pay for cancer treatment. But now that private equity and hedge funds are involved they extract the life savings of people for medical treatment.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          pretty much, upper middle class. its when you get past 10million+ in spending power is where it sets it apart from millionaires.

      • Carighan Maconar@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I did a lot of thinking about this over the years (not the youngest one anymore) and I will say that I think my personal limit would be at ~10 mil. Beyond that, I fail to comprehend what amount of money I have. I can comprehend 1 mil, which means I can use in excess of that in some capacity, even pointlessly.

        But 10 mil? That stops being an amount of cash, it’s just “Me rich nao”.

        • blattrules@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, that’s the number I came to also. At that point, you don’t have to work anymore and can mostly just live very comfortably off of the interest. There’s no way you’d catch me still working if I had that much saved.

        • FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yep

          I have been reasonably wealthy before, and it was through a lot of luck with plenty of shitty, long hours

          But the only way I could have gotten more was by shitting on people, and that’s not something I’m willing to do

          • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            I don’t really keep up with random people’s politics, and I suppose anything short of a communist is considered far right in these circles, but putting aside the idea that anyone who doesn’t support collectivism is a devil incarnate, what’s unethical about making a game and pawning it off to M$ for a billion $?

            • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              20 hours ago

              I mean, if you aren’t keeping up with their social stances and politics, you probably shouldn’t be putting them on the “good millionaires” list.

              • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                18 hours ago

                I’m not, I’m just asking what’s unethical about having money. If he made it fair and square what’s wrong with that? Notch is a good example because he’s self made and didn’t have a big corpo behind him, anything beyond that is irrelevant to the argument I’m making.

                • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  There is nothing unethical about having money. Ethics are what you do with the money once you have it. Ethics are how you got the money in the first place. It’s not unethical to have a car. If I stole the car, that is unethical. If I use it for a hit and run, that is unethical. Notch has money. He also used his fame and reach that came with that money to spout hate speech.

  • hansolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Y’all - if you looked at the original “Trillion dollar offer” it’s effectively somewhere between impossible and a hallucination. It requires increasing Tesla sales by a factor of 11 and selling 1 million Optimus robots which aren’t even commercially available for sale. Even Yale called it stupid.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Unless Musk already knows that the Trumpistanian Christian fascist kleptocracy is already planning on buying all cyber trucks for a premium, and contracting 1 million Optimus kill bots to conduct their mass murder.

      • hansolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Nah, they’re tapped out already. If they didn’t buy cybertrucks 4 or 5 months ago, they’re not up for it now. They should be donating 10% of their income to the church, and 20% to El Jeffe anyway.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    I will never endorse catholicism (or christianity), but this seems to be one cool pope. Actually preaching what Jesus tought.

    Also Fuck Elon. He just wants to make headlines with superlatives, but he & his companies are already on the long way down. Prove me wrong.

    • Hector@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      The last Pope was good as well. I wonder what the last time in history there was a pope that can be considered good before francis?

      Francis by the way is the name the previous Pope took on being elected Pope, named after sanctified religious guy from Italy that is the patron saint of animals and nature. Actually a pretty cool guy. I’m not Catholic either though.

  • Hector@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I would hope the pope might also be somewhat concerned about the whole Nazi thing. Not very Catholic those Nazis. I understand he cannot say that though because Nazis are so popular right now.