Jared Birchall is Elon Musk’s right hand man. He controls Elon Musk’s family foundation and is in charge of hiring bodyguards to protect Elon. He is one of the very few people that Elon Musk trusts.

With his wife Laura, he lives in Austin, Texas.

According to public documents, they are located at 16715, Destiny Cove, Austin, TX 78738-7421.

Donald Trump falsely said migrant families living in Springfield, Ohio, were stealing pets and eating cats and dogs.

Elon Musk amplified these lies on X.

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/18/media/elon-musk-trump-rally-bomb-election-misinformation

As a result, these families received thousands death threats.

https://www.npr.org/2024/09/19/nx-s1-5114047/springfield-ohio-haitian-migrants-trump-safety-concerns

Jared Birchall laughed about it. He absolutely loved it. His lovely wife Laura Birchall thought this was very funny.

Jared is obsessed about his privacy. He doesn’t want anyone to know who he is.

“Why are you posting their picture?”

Free speech absolutism baby.

I don’t owe them shit.

  • MoreZombies@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    You posted sources for everything but the idea that Birchall loved it.

    Not doubting, but it is weird that everything else in your post has citations and sources, except the crux of your point.

  • IonTempted@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    If I was Elon’s right hand man I’d be ashamed if people saw my face too. I’d much rather people know me for my kinks

    • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      you think what he does and supports doesn’t affect other people’s families? So, he can fuck with people’s families, but his family is beyond reproach? How does that make sense? Why do we have to respect the monster’s family when he obviously doesn’t have any qualms disrespecting our families? Fuck them kids. Monsters in training.

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I don’t care about the wife, she’s old enough to know what kind of man is married. But the kids are not at fault of what family they born into.

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You understand this line of thinking is exactly why Elon Musk was allowed to fly under the radar for so many years?

        No, the children are not at fault. They are his progeny, and they will be taught to think like him. Especially considering how rich they are.

        • Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          And you understand that no matter how you want to spin it, putting babies in the line of fire is fucking disgusting. No matter what you think they might grow up to be. Trump rapes kids, but youre happy to murder them. Tell me again how youre the fucking good guy?

    • nesc@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Actually, post his family, friends and literally everyone he associates with.

      • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Right…. Because its only bad when they do it….

        Who else do we know that subscribes to this moronic ideology?

        • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          I’m fine with a truce. They get rid of flock cameras, mass collection of communications metadata, etc, which includes our children, and I’ll support censoring posts like this.

          But unilateral disarmament is what got us here.

          • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Cool. So you agree. It’s only bad when they do it. Honesty counts for something at least.

            • Gorgritch_Umie_Killa@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Its a breaking of social contract argument.

              Its bad when everyone does it, the point isn’t whether its a good thing to do or not. The social contract only works if people largely adhere to the conditions. The argument is that these people have broken their part, therefore are no longer entitled to the benefits of the bargain. It is a loss for society in general, and the action is a proposed remedy (as a social cost) aiming to restore the social contract.

              • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                Yeah. That’s not how that works as I see it. If we agree that murder is bad, and someone murders, that’s not open-season for everyone else to freely murder.

                If there’s a social contract that is broken by one side- the invitation to break it from the other side is not (or should not be) the default. This is why there is a system of law. Going vigilante is how societies collapse.

                • Gorgritch_Umie_Killa@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Ah, no your argument is definitely on the same page then, but at different ends of that page.

                  So your disagreement goes to degree of breaking and ability for remedy.

                  Their argument is, the degree of targetting and surveillance has surpassed normal constraints while the ability for a remedy within the normal constraints of the social contract is no longer possible.

                  To take your example if a murderer is arrested and tried then order is restored and with it the social contract begins to heal. If the murderer however isn’t arrested and tried, then continues to murder, then what alternative remedies are available to be resorted to.

        • ExtremeUnicorn@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The paradox of tolerance.

          It’s a fine idea, but you can not equate the right to privacy of an innocent person and a perpetrator. (I know courts see this differently.)

          The only point I would agree on is leave out the kids, they had no choice.

          • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            5 hours ago

            “If you can’t rise above the shit, you’re the shit”.

            It’s hard to have a platform to say they’re bad for doing it while also justifying doing it.

            • Jax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              So what do you do for work? I’m just wondering how far detached from reality you actually are.

              • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                26 minutes ago

                Gotta love the ridiculously stupid questions you people ask to find a way to circumvent actually discussing a topic with any sense of rationality.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        10 hours ago

        No one is saying to target his family. A photo of him that also includes them is not a problem.

        • Waryle@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Don’t post children’s faces, what the hell, what’s wrong with you all

            • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              6 hours ago

              LMAO…. You’re the epitome of hypocrisy! Is horrible and tragic when they do it- but justified when you do it?

              If you don’t rise above the shit, YOU are the shit.

              • Deceptichum@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                Uhuh sure thing champ. Whatever you make up in your head to tell yourself.

                • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  16
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  Fucking hilarious! Dude! The proof is this entire discussion! Your own words!

                  Are you saying you aren’t to be taken seriously?

                  You cry about how the right has done this, and provided examples to illustrate how it’s bad- an in the same discussion, justify doing it.

                  LMAO!

                  The cognitive dissonance it takes to rationalize this shit alone would keep me up at night.

            • Waryle@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I’ve blocked Tiktok, Twitter and Instagram on my network and refuse to use them, so I won’t look at your link.

              • Deceptichum@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                It’s the photo uploaded to his media account. These are photo’s they are happy to have online, so there’s no reason to act so offended about it.

                • Waryle@jlai.lu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  This is clearly a post putting a target on that man, let’s stop being obtuse here. I don’t care about shaming him publicly as he is a piece of shit, but don’t expose children to this, or you’re a piece of shit too. For fuck’s sake, have some decency, even if their father have none.

      • twinnie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Exactly. If the right wingers started posting pictures of the families of left wingers we’d be calling them out for it.

        • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          “You’re swinging your swords at the other army, but I bet you don’t like it when they drone strike you! How hypocritical!”

          People at war like to expose the enemy while protecting their own, news at 11.

          The difference is we don’t have Panantir and flock cameras tracking their movements and comms. All we have is posts like this — knowing they fucking exist — while traitors condemn us for it. We’re losing, but at least it’s fucking something.