• Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Giving them the ability to close their own doors just screams “kid’s arm smashed in automatic car door failure”.

    • timestatic@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Just make the motor not slam the door but close it slowly with not enough force to harm someone and put like two sensors + 1 backup in there

      • Lumidaub@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Call me a cynical luddite but somehow I don’t trust today’s autonomous car technology to be reliable and fool-proof enough for that mechanism not to fail catastrophically and randomly because it’s raining or someone on the other side of the street made a sudden movement or Mercury is in retrograde or the company’s stock market just dropped 592 points because investors are furious after realising they wasted money on a backup or it’s Tuesday.

        • timestatic@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          You know we already have autonomous doors for houses. I feel like theres a lot more trust involved having a 2 ton vehicle move significant speeds on the road than having it close a door

          • Lumidaub@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I do not know that. I’d also assume the technology to close a door on a car to work very differently from that on a house because a door on a house that may not be closed properly is far less dangerous than one on a car. Also, yes, I don’t trust that 2 ton vehicle either if it claims to be autonomous.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      But they built in a saw blade killswitch if a finger is detected a good decade ago or more. Surely they can apply such technology to cars.

      • Lumidaub@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It hasn’t yet been used without people around who can stop the process if it goes wrong.

      • piecat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The sawstop causes mechanical damage that must be repaired if activated. It’s more like an airbag than an e-stop.

    • B-TR3E@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Behold the miracle of the slipping clutch, millenials. See It working without being digital and all without an app by the ancient secrets of mechanics!

    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 day ago

      I used to have a Tesla (traded it in). In the app you could open, but not close, the windows. It could be inconvenient at times but I assume the reasoning was similar.

      • Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        New cars have automatic window up functions but strictly dont apply enough pressure to choke a child

        • flynnguy@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Mine goes up automatically and if it encounters resistance, it goes back down again. I guess this is too hard for Tesla.

          • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 hours ago

            IIRC people were testing cybertrucks for some auto-closing functionality, and if they encountered resistance, they would back off… Then try harder, slicing through hotdogs

          • njordomir@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Still hurts like hell though… from someone who once accidentally rolled up the window BEFORE pulling my head in. :-D

      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s weird. Most of the cars I have had can open and close the windows from the fob. (Usually double press then hold unlock or lock, though one car I had [Accord] required the key in the door for the windows to go up.)

        • toynbee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          Right - I think the difference is that, when using a fob, you’re likely within line of sight or at least nearby your car and so presumably could observe or otherwise check for car occupants, but so long as your car and phone both have reception you can use the app from anywhere without any clue who might be in or around the car.