• timestatic@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Why can’t they build a mechanism where the car can close its own doors. I thought that would be the smaller part compared to autonomous self driving

    • bthest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      The gig worker is the mechanism. Very innovative tech.

      I know I can shut a passenger side car door with just the accelerator and brakes. If it’s not latched completely then a bollard or a curbside tree will suffice.

  • macke49@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Human driven taxis have mechanically closing passenger doors for decades. It’s a big bug software and a management a failure . This can’t be street legal. Autonomous cabs are billionaires snake oil

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Hell, the Mexican colectivo van driver closes the sliding doors on his rattly 20 year old van simply by hard braking.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        I’ve seen cars with self-closing doors though. Also I’m not sure where the safety consideration would come in since we have self closing building doors right now and no one seems to get cut in half by those.

      • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        They already exist though? There are a bunch of EVs with servos in their doors. You can still overpower it just like you can an auto closing trunk

        edit: and they can also have proximity sensors, i know cadillac does that and their implementation is hyper vigilant, will stop the front door even if you’re next to the pillar

      • Krzd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Eh, we already have self closing trunks. As long as they are programmed correctly (not by Tesla) they sense resistance and stop.

        • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I don’t think programming is a problem, auto closing trunks and doors aren’t strong enough. You can test that on any self closing trunk door, it will sound and feel awful but they’re not strong at all.

          • Krzd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 hours ago

            They absolutely are strong enough to break fingers. The Tesla dumpster is famous for cutting into fingers with the self closing trunk

            • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Tesla isn’t a good example of how anything is done in the industry, but rather of how not to do it.

              I don’t doubt Tesla’s doors are designed to mutilate their customers, much like they’re designed to trap them inside in the event of a fire, probably because Musk’s ketamine addled brain though it’d be funny, but that’s not how any other company would do it, even if only because because lawsuits cost money and weaker locks are cheaper.

      • B-TR3E@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Nothing a slipping clutch won’t fix. There already are self-closing doors everywhere. Maybe not in cars but in all sorts of vehicles and everywhere in buildings.

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    162
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Putting aside all the late stage capitalism going on here, I still can’t get over the fact that Alphabet (Google) spent billions of dollars developing self driving car technology only to arrive at, “Oh shit. Someone left the car door open. What do we do now?”

    • Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      99
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Giving them the ability to close their own doors just screams “kid’s arm smashed in automatic car door failure”.

      • timestatic@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Just make the motor not slam the door but close it slowly with not enough force to harm someone and put like two sensors + 1 backup in there

        • Lumidaub@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Call me a cynical luddite but somehow I don’t trust today’s autonomous car technology to be reliable and fool-proof enough for that mechanism not to fail catastrophically and randomly because it’s raining or someone on the other side of the street made a sudden movement or Mercury is in retrograde or the company’s stock market just dropped 592 points because investors are furious after realising they wasted money on a backup or it’s Tuesday.

          • timestatic@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 hours ago

            You know we already have autonomous doors for houses. I feel like theres a lot more trust involved having a 2 ton vehicle move significant speeds on the road than having it close a door

            • Lumidaub@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I do not know that. I’d also assume the technology to close a door on a car to work very differently from that on a house because a door on a house that may not be closed properly is far less dangerous than one on a car. Also, yes, I don’t trust that 2 ton vehicle either if it claims to be autonomous.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        But they built in a saw blade killswitch if a finger is detected a good decade ago or more. Surely they can apply such technology to cars.

        • Lumidaub@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          44 minutes ago

          It hasn’t yet been used without people around who can stop the process if it goes wrong.

        • piecat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The sawstop causes mechanical damage that must be repaired if activated. It’s more like an airbag than an e-stop.

      • B-TR3E@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Behold the miracle of the slipping clutch, millenials. See It working without being digital and all without an app by the ancient secrets of mechanics!

      • toynbee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        1 day ago

        I used to have a Tesla (traded it in). In the app you could open, but not close, the windows. It could be inconvenient at times but I assume the reasoning was similar.

        • Kairos@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          New cars have automatic window up functions but strictly dont apply enough pressure to choke a child

          • flynnguy@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Mine goes up automatically and if it encounters resistance, it goes back down again. I guess this is too hard for Tesla.

            • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 hours ago

              IIRC people were testing cybertrucks for some auto-closing functionality, and if they encountered resistance, they would back off… Then try harder, slicing through hotdogs

            • njordomir@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Still hurts like hell though… from someone who once accidentally rolled up the window BEFORE pulling my head in. :-D

        • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s weird. Most of the cars I have had can open and close the windows from the fob. (Usually double press then hold unlock or lock, though one car I had [Accord] required the key in the door for the windows to go up.)

          • toynbee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 day ago

            Right - I think the difference is that, when using a fob, you’re likely within line of sight or at least nearby your car and so presumably could observe or otherwise check for car occupants, but so long as your car and phone both have reception you can use the app from anywhere without any clue who might be in or around the car.

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This shows you just how strong our culture is an influence here. You can leave a door open and cause enough trouble that they need to hire someone else to go manually shut it. I’m willing to bet there are a lot of seemingly innocuous ways to cause friction with these companies. The more people know and exploit them, the better.

    • Chulk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Even if this thing was left on a single city block for 8 hours with its door open, the data it collects about nearby cars, Bluetooth devices, phones, WiFi SSIDs, recorded video/audio, etc. makes it worth it for alphabet, I imagine.

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      When I was a kid my dad would drive forward and slam the brakes to close our van door.

      It was really fun until that became the only way that closed the door.

  • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Does it charge extra to the last person that used the Waymo to cover the cost? Because if not, might as well just leave the door open every time, now you’re a job creator.

    • Corngood@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      1 day ago

      Just keep the door and you’re creating even more jobs in the door factory.

    • 87Six@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Don’t forget to fart as deep into the chair cushions as possible as well

      • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        No this is more like that old legend about the French colonial forces trying to solve the local rat problem in a Vietnamese city by paying the local populations 1 franc per rat that they kill and turn in. It made the locals breed rats to kill and turn them in for the bounty.

        We need to recognize that we are now “the local population” in that scenario. We need to milk the billionaire class dry at every turn and throw as many profit losses into their game as they yield any surface area to attack. It must be attacked.

        Flip their game 1 dollar game for them into 2 dollars for you every chance you can.

  • skip0110@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hmmm…so it costs Waymo $11.25 if you “forget” to shut the door.

    Maybe people will become very forgetful.

    Or, upon reflection, just don’t use Waymo, and don’t play into it at all.

    • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you leave it all the way open, the car just needs to drive a couple feet with decent acceleration to close it.

      If you ALMOST close it, but not all the way, that would require some sort of intervention.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Need a car to get to the airport, because my city doesn’t have mass transit.

      If the only cars in my area are Waymos, do I just skip my flight?

      • Lumidaub@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        “Don’t use X” always means “it’s okay to use X if there are no alternatives but do look for alternatives”. Unless X is X. Then don’t use X.

  • Canuck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Its funny because in the US, there are regulations that make it such that, even if they have the capability to close the doors remotely and anti pinch sensors etc, they are not allowed to unless it is done by someone from a device nearby while they hold down the close button.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The future is clocking in for another 12 hour shift at the “making minor adjustments to the super intelligent AI dick sucking factory” so you can afford to eat the bugs and live in the pod