• SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    xkcd forgot the one where nobody really wants to play bored games and everyone thinks everyone else is kinda interested. There is always exactly one person who wants to play bored games.

  • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Due to ill-advised tie-ins, in MTG you can now pit Dwight Schrute against Bebop & Rocksteady with help from Ian Malcolm and SpongeBob, who has the One Ring. Don’t worry, here comes Godzilla and Hatsune Miku to save the day, just tap your Bob Ross lands to play.

      • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        51 minutes ago

        Yeah… yeah. They’ve taken what have might been a niche one-off for collectors here and there and turned it into the driving force of their game. Lord of the Rings was well received as a full set expansion because it’s Lord of the fucking Rings and the Tolkien realm translates well into the established game. But Spiderman? Ninja Turtles? Avatar? The Office? Soon Star Trek? I’m so tired of rushed to market expansions, having to learn all sorts of new rules to justify other IPs doing what they do (and probably breaking the game along the way), and artwork that looks like ass. It’s just not fun anymore.

        • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          31 minutes ago

          It’s just not fun anymore.

          I’ve said it before, but the game is pure ass these days.

          https://lemmy.world/post/40381588/21086078

          Every fucking card is either bullshit removal, or “When you resolve this spell turn a land into a 0/0 creature and put a +1/+1 counter on each land that turned into a creature this turn and draw a card if your land creatures have five enchantments”.

      • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It isn’t a joke. They didn’t even bring up real life people that are in cards, or SpongeBob, mylitttle pony, Fortnite, or furby.

          • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Hasbro relies on MTG to make them profitable, so there’s been a lot of selling out.

            Even if you ignore the Universes beyond, the price of packs is way too high now, and they’ve made some blatant cash grabs.

            “30th anniversary” was a secial set with a different back, making them basically the same as the old gold-boarded decks, not tournament legal. This results in them being considered proxies, but made by WoTC… For $1000 for 4 boosters.

          • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            10 hours ago

            There’s still zombies, but now you can fight them with the cast of the Walking Dead! Also, if you left 30yrs ago you’d be sorely disappointed to see how shit the art has gotten. So much AI or “AI enhanced” slop.

    • Fondots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I remember one time being over a friend’s house, he had some board game they just dug out of the back of a closet somewhere and we were thinking about playing it. Can’t remember which game it was, I want to say it may have been Diplomacy, but I’m not 100% on that.

      We open it up, looked like all the pieces were there, and we started reading through what we thought was the rulebook, it was a fairly beefy book.

      Then we realized that what we had wasn’t in fact the rulebook, but some sort of secondary book that referenced the full rulebook, which it called “intimidating”

      On reading that, we decided that this game was just too much trouble for how much effort we were willing to put in that day.

  • BillyClark@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The problem with Goku tie-ins and expansions is that the game’s balance depends on Goku not being available.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Goku is the mechanism that prevents the game from going on endlessly. As each player feels like they want to do something else, they reveal a dragon ball on the board (if there are less than 7 players, the game starts with however many dragon balls are required to make the total 7). If a player is eliminated, the player that knocks them out gets their dragon ball.

      Once all 7 dragon balls are revealed (or owned by you), you can declare that you’re searching for them, after which you roll a search check each turn and if you get the dragon ball symbol, then roll the 7-sided die to determine which one you found. If you roll one you already have, it goes missing (another player can hide it on the map). If you roll the dragon ball finder, you get an extra roll each turn (which can be given up to avoid losing a dragon ball).

      Once you have collected all 7 dragon balls, you must summon Porunga (yes, we managed to grab Namek’s dragon before Frieza turned it all to lava), turn out the lights and wish for Goku to be revived or summoned there. At this point, Goku will challenge whoever the strongest fighter is. He is not strong enough to defeat any players in his normal form, so you’ll need to tell him to not hold back and then defeat him (because he’ll agree but hold back anyways). Once Goku goes SSJ, he will eliminate one player per turn, starting from the strongest, but after eliminating one player you’ll need to feed him before he feels like fighting the next one. This brings us to the farming mechanics… (continues on for 16 pages)

  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    22 hours ago

    So I actually make board games, and I got really excited to see which category my games fit in, but there are definitely large gaps in the coverage of this list.

    At least, I hope my games don’t fall under “overcomplicated” or “boring”…

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      i have been playing an overcomplicated game once a month with my besties/chosen family for the last… i don’t know. a while. and we love it.

      we did have to buy inserts for the box (frosthaven) to speed up the setup from two hours to like half an hour because So Many Damn Cards but like, we love the game. I think we’re maybe a quarter through and we hope to finish it this decade.

    • massive_bereavement@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Overcomplicated for some can be the right mix for others, there are lots of niche games that take longer to explain than to play and are at the top of BGG.

      Make board games and you will live forever*.

      *As long as your boardgames exist.

      Edit: This was supposed to be read as an inspirational post. If you read it otherwise, go back to the beginning and reread it, don’t collect 200 dollars.

    • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Here’s an open ended game I invented.

      Two teams or individuals can play. First up picks two movie stars who never worked together. Say Helen Mirren and Bruce Lee. Second player has to come up with a plot for the two. Because Helen made movies from 18 until today she can play any age, but Bruce can only be as old as he was in his last movie.