• SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    27 minutes ago

    Definitely either 88 or 98. Large, very visible, no bullshit. I prefer 98, but would also be perfectly happy with 88. The reason I like 98 better than 88 is because 98, while not as high of contrast, is closer to if it’s physically there, with shadows and stuff, and therefore visually faster recognizable as a scroll bar, it’s more intuitive.

  • sonofearth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I love how 1998 looks. It is clean and servers the purpose. 2001-2009 feel over designed, 1988 and 2012 not sure whether the dark part is the scroller or the light part lol.

  • InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I hate the modern ones you need to hover above so they even display, and then it’s 1 pixel wide and a shade of grey that’s about 2% darker than white.
    Less functional and 500 lines of js garbage.

    • chisel@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s a few lines of css, no JS required.

      .my-div:hover {
        overflow-x: scroll;
      }
      

      And the look and feel of the scrollbar is generally determined by the browser/OS. Unless someone does a custom scrollbar implementation, but that is exceedingly rare. So that thin rounded gray bar is a browser/OS design, again, without any JS.

  • jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    1998 was truly the best time. When all OS widgets looked the same. And could be used in apps, and everything had a consistent look. Yeah you could override this in your app. But fuck people who did that. Everything looked so nice and uniform and you knew what to expect from a widget and its look and behavior. Get off my lawn.

  • macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    imho the clustered version of the scroll bar buttons (like in Amiga Workbench 2.0+, Macintosh OS, macOS, KDE) make way more sense to me (minimal mouse movement to change scroll direction) than this spread out layout.

  • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    1998 was in my formative years with computers, so I will always be partial to it. Xfce can get pretty close.

    • cannedtuna@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Honestly I’m partial to it as well. Possibly for the same reasons, but also because the bar and buttons are clearly defined and have good contrast. The later designs begin to fade out until now the scroll bar is just a thin line, which is sometimes hidden, so you don’t see it unless you’re looking for it.