• Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Honestly that realization is the most infuriating part of this saga.

    If that’s still true we have already lost the Ai race with china

    • sanitation@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      We already lost it. That’s why the IPO ing now. Try kimi, glm models - no difference from opus

  • redsand@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The grid really can’t handle AI data centers. Elon’s monster in Georgia is surrounded by turbine generators. A bunch of these new builds need power capacity added to work.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I’m convinced it’s intentional because the ultra rich have figured out that we have gotten so close to an Economic Singularity that they are burning money in any way possible so that they don’t lose the power they have currently, and would lose the moment that an Economic Singularity actually takes place.

      They aren’t just burning the world to cause climate change to kill the poors, they are, in fact, burning the planet to desperately pull up a ladder, that isn’t a ladder, and is a floor, to prevent it from materializing. They’re trying to kill the rest of us, before we all have the exact same buying power they have, or at least close enough that the difference is academic.

  • TaeKwonDoh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    People really said that electric vehicles were too much strain on the grid? All I ever heard em say was that they’re pointless.

    • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Nope, it really is something anti-BEV folks say. “We can’t just all switch to electric cars, we couldn’t possibly charge too many simultanously.”

      • relativestranger@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        which is bullshit, of course. we couldn’t possibly all fill up with gasoline at the same time, either.

        and many would be charging cars overnight at home on ordinary 220-240v, when electric demand is lowest. you can’t fill up a gas tank at home.

        • Ghoelian@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 minutes ago

          I’m not at all on these people’s side, but to be completely fair, you’re right, many would be charging their cars overnight, so at the same time. If many do this, electric demand at night would shoot up dramatically.

          I don’t know if grids will be able to handle this (varies by country surely), but it definitely has an impact.

    • Rev@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Think it depends where you live. Here in Alberta after having switched fully to electric every single human (not a exaggeration) has told me we can’t all switch cause the grid can’t handle it. Not sure why they continue to keep telling me that cause I really don’t care if people switch or not, I just wanted to switch to become more sustainable for retirement.

  • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Those “it just offset the emissions to the powerplant” folks is probably eating their own word now.

    • relativestranger@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      “it just offset the emissions to the powerplant”

      which is, of course, actually better than tailpipe emissions all over town.

      • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        A few years back there’s a huge pushback against EV because they’re saying the tailpipe emissions is only outsourced to the coal/gas plant, so no point doing that for cleaner air. Now datacenter is using more power than people can imagine, raking up the emission even more than EV. Now you have tailpipe emissions AND the emissions from the excessive power usage of slopcenter.

      • Rothe@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        They are still taking capacity and parts for powerplants which could have been used to power actual useful stuff. This is like when cryptobros attempt to claim that they were mining with green energy. It doesn’t matter, the energy used should not be used for this useless shit which only exists to fulfill the greed of a small handful of shitty people.