• VibeSurgeon@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Has opening up rail markets really been a boon for on-time performance for rail in Europe? I thought it mainly improved the situation for ticket pricing, while on-time performance is mostly an infrastructure issue.

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    By the way, it’s not really the trains. We have other companies run many lines, especially with the commuter trains. It’s the rest of the infrastructure. The tracks, switches, signals, railway control centers… Those break all the time because they’ve been stingy with the upkeep for decades. In effect causing the delays. So, if you run third-party trains over the same tracks, they’ll also get delayed or cancelled, exactly as the DB ones do.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Apparently German trains are so bad that they’re not allowed on the French network because they screwed the timetable.

    That’s got to be embarrassing for the Germans, how can you be bested by the French?

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    15 hours ago

    pretty sure there’s a whole bunch of history books that show italians helping germans with trains is a bad idea.

  • UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Oh right, opening our train network to competition even more is going to fix our broken rail network that suffers from decades of neglect? The very neglect the unions have critized again and again and again?

    Right, that sounds totally plausible.

    • cinoreus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Privatisation always feels like a solution to shitty government services till some ultra rich company comes in, provides good service while burning cash, capturing the entire market forming a monopoly or duopoly, then raising the prices while making service shittier, and the government will say they can’t do anything now because shutting them down would mean paralyzing the entire railway of the country.

      If this feels oddly specific, it’s because I’ve seen this happen with my own eyes, just not in the railway.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        We’re just getting to the end of this process with our rail infrastructure in the UK. The companies have spent absolutely no money on maintenance, and now everything’s broken, and the only way to fix it is to buy everything back into public ownership, then spend a bunch of taxpayer money.

        Trying to run infrastructure projects for profit is a stupid idea. The “profit” is a more dynamic economy facilitated by better transport links. It ain’t going to be in the form of cash.

    • DandomRude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Yes, this is the result of neo-capitalist policies; Deutsche Bahn has been partially privatized, which—as is always the case with this logic—means that profits flow into the pockets of billionaires while losses are borne by the general public. That is why, for example, Germany’s internet infrastructure is at the level of a Third World country, even though Telekom generates enormous revenue.

      It’s the result of U.S.-style exploitative capitalism, from which we cannot break free because—just as in the U.S.—it has corrupted all the levers of power—but hey, that’s why Germany has so many billionaires compared to other countries.

      Edit: That, by the way, is also why the AfD is so strong in Germany. It’s a carbon copy of MAGA and owes its popularity to the same billionaires. This party is anything but an “alternative,” as its name might lead misinformed people to believe: It embodies everything Trump stands for—corruption and unscrupulousness—and that’s putting it quite mildly.

      Educate yourselves, read their party platform, and let people know what it stands for. If you don’t want an oligarchy, that’s your civic duty!

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It’s the economist.

    Why did they not check how well privatization worked out in the UK’s rail, where one of the Labour policies had been to re-nationalise the railways since the current privatised model sucks so fucking bad?

  • assembly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Has anyone in Germany been on the Italian trains? I’ve done it a few times and the trains that weren’t broken were pretty dilapidated. Like the bathroom was a hole cut in the floor of the train car. That’s for the trains that weren’t broken.

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      This week, I spent 3.5 hours traveling 35 km. It was round trip, because the trains stopped traveling in my original direction and I had to go home. Three weeks ago, I spent six hours traveling less than 80 km.

      I could literally bicycle faster. I’d be okay with a hole in the floor as long as they mounted a seat on it for handicapped riders.

  • fireweed@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    So much for that old joke about what countries oversee what aspects of society in heaven vs hell…