As a kid I imagined the future as being able to hold a TV in your pocket, and flying skateboards. For the latter I guess electric scooters will have to do

  • Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    As most of the other comments point out, pocket TV did exist and you have exposed yourself as:

    1. Younger than the smartphone
    2. Never watched a 90’s movie with a security guard in it
    • BeatTakeshi@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Both wrong

      1. 1st smartphone Galaxy Spica age 26

      2. These TV wouldn’t fit in your jeans

      You missed the point of my very unelaborate shower thought. I see how not being a thing could be understood as never existed. I meant a big thing like, you know, smartphones

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      And actual pocket TVs. Interesting to see OP think they were never a thing. Don’t get me wrong, they were shit, but they did exist!

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I used one as recent as the mid 2000’s. There was some sporting event going on (probably women’s world cup) and I wanted to watch the game while playing in Ultimate league. Streaming wasn’t as prevalent as it is now and the game was on OTA channel.

  • Krafty Kactus@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    I mean they literally are, you can watch literally any tv show or movie on them so I don’t see a difference.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Absolutely! (Same as playing a regular game on a Game Gear.)

        I had both an AC adapter and a 12VDC car adapter for mine. Without those (considering the sorry state of rechargeables back then), the cost of batteries would’ve made actually using the damn thing untenable.

      • TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Probably! According to Wikipedia you get 3-5 hours off of 6 AA batteries. Not sure how that changes with the TV tuner but battery life wasn’t great.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    There absolutely were pocket TV’s. As a kid, even, I owned two of them. They are now of course functionally useless because they predate the switch to digital television by a significant margin. Both of mine were Realistic brand ones, which was an in store label for Radio Shack. Color LCD displays, telescoping antenna, and they ran off of 4 AA batteries. They were about the size of an OG Gameboy or a large Walkman.

    I might even still have one in a box of tech junk somewhere. I believe the second one was a Realistic Pocketvision 27.

    You can still buy a portable digital TV. These were always a bit of a stretch for a “pocket” television, more the size of a small tablet but thicker. But they totally did, and still do, exist.

  • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    What are you even on about? I have a screen in my pocket where i can watch quite literally every movie that exists.
    Imagine being a time traveller and someone asks you if you have any cool tech like a pocket tv.
    “Hah, no kiddo, we dont. I have that screnn with access to movies and tv shows tho.”

  • I mean… They were a thing before smartphones.

    I thought it was random as fuck when I worked at Walmart, I was asked to clean out the traps in the freezer (like a liquid channel for spills) and I found a pocket TV from the 90’s stuffed in there, still in the packaging. This was only a few years ago; that thing had to have been in there for at least 2 decades.

  • snownyte@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    And tablets killed those digital picture frames. Because why have those when you can just prop a tablet down and have it on slideshow mode.

    • Meron35@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      No? Searching for “digital picture frame” brings up pages of results. These are popular enough because they are much cheaper than an equivalently sized tablet, e.g. a 10 inch digital picture frame details for around $150, which is less than half the price of a crappy android tablet.

      Also, tablets don’t really exceed 12 inches or so in size, but you can get digital picture frames as large as TVs.

    • BeatTakeshi@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I know it’s semantics, but if your great-gramps would time travel to today, he would ask about your pocket TV, and you would reply nah, it’s a smartphone

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Which is actually not smartphone, but a general purpose computer with cell internet connection that can be used for many things, one of those is actually calling.