“We can’t succeed without breaking the law. We can’t succeed without operating unethically.”
I’m so sick of this bullshit. They pretend to love a free market until it’s not in their favor and then they ask us to bend over backwards for them.
Too many people think they’re superior. Which is ironic, because they’re also the ones asking for handouts and rule bending. If you were superior, you wouldn’t need all the unethical things that you’re asking for.
Sounds like you are describing the orange baboon in the white house.
So pirating full works for commercial use suddenly is “fair use”, or what? Lets see what e.g. Disney says about this.
So pirating full works suddenly is fair use, or what?
Only if you’re doing it to learn, I guess
Wait until all those expensive scientific journals hear about this
Slave owners might go broke after abolition? 😂
I’m going to have to remember this
Gentlemen, this is democracy manifest!
What is the charge, officer? Eating a meal? A succulent Chinese meal?
God forbid you offer to PAY for access to works that people create like everyone else has to. University students have to pay out the nose for their books that they “train” on, why can’t billion dollar AI companies?
Where are the copyright lawsuits by Nintendo and Disney when you need them lol
If everyone can ‘train’ themselves on copyrighted works, then I say "fair game.‘’
Otherwise, get fucked.
Come on bro, let us pirate bro, just one more ngram of books bro
Fair use doesn’t mean shit if you’re a pirate.
Arr, matey.
Why does Sam keep threatening us with a good time?
If your business model only works if you break the Law, that mean’s you’re just another Organised Crime group.
This sounds like socialism is good for capitalists
AI always been about using stolen stuff
Training that AI is absolutely fair use.
Selling that AI service that was trained on copyrighted material is absolutely not fair use.
Agreed… although I would go a step further and say distributing the LLM model or the results of use (even if done without cost) is not fair use, as the training materials weren’t licensed.
Ultimatelly it’s “Doing Research that advances knowledge for everybody” that should be allowed free use of copyrighted materials, whils activities for direct or indirect commercial gains (included Research whose results are Patented and then licensed for a fee) should not, IMHO.
