- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
It has the potential to do away with chemotherapy, surgery and radiation treatment.
I read that as: Will never reach the market because it threatens a multibillion dollar industry.
But srsly, glioblastoma is a really nasty motherfucker with a very low patient survival rate, so if they’ve really managed to cure it that’s a huge milestone.
I’m gonna be watching with popcorn when anti-vaxxers get cancer and definitely 100% will take this vaccine.
I mean, if it’s true and not just shit science reporting that I assume it is.
Too bad we got a Sociopathic Oligarchs as HSS, who thinks mRNA vaccines should be banned. Cancer is better than…well, whatever is wrong with mRNA vaccines.
amazing. i can already hear the anti vax crowd seething lol
What is the catch?
We’ll find out in 30 years
It causes cancer.
Whatatweest!
A fellow Robot Chicken connoisseur, I see! You have very good taste.
Besides that, I assume it comes at the cost of…unintended consequences for the body
As all medicines do, we still take medicine because it’s good for us in most situations when needed.
The ol’ cure the disease by killing the patient technique. Classic
Conservatives will somehow find a way to level this as devil worshiping blasphemy and let their children die of brain cancer instead.
Any cancer? How does this work with people who have gene mutations that suppress cancer-fighting defence systems.
E X T E R M I N A T E/s
CIA hitmen:
“It’s not a tumor!!!”
No please, no. We don’t need this, please
Why
Ragebait
Those in power will live longer and you’re an idiot if you think that they will not be the first if not the only to receive the treatment.
Are you prepared to see Trump’s fifth turn?
This vaccine supposedly kills cancer. It doesn’t reverse aging. Trump is fucking oooollld.
Cancer liberated so many souls like Hugo Chavez, Pol Pot, Suhatro, Sese Seko, Assad, Karimov, Salazar and Mugabe. This vaccine would’ve saved 5-15 years of their lives
Brother it’s a cancer treatment, not the elixir of life
deleted by creator
Biologically, this argument makes no sense, it’s almost certainly written by somebody not familiar with physiology and just trying to sound poetic. That or a journalists severely misinterpreting a quote or analogy from a researcher, which also happens quite a lot.
Cancers have a gigantic variety of causes, but a purposeful signaling pathway is not one.
but a purposeful absence of preventive pathway could be one
What an extraordinary claim - I’m sure you’ll be happy to provide evidence of this.
What a load of bollocks. Natural cell mutation causes both evolution as well as unwanted side effects, of which cancerous cells are one.
Every cancer and every body is different. Why search for universal cancer vaccine insted for AI tha will analyze individual biopsy and persons blood work and came up with targetet 100 % efficient cure?
You need to let the scientists know this! I’m sure your insights will be very valuable to them.
I’m sure mainstream science will deny it’s true, you know how hung up they are on their glass beakers and flasks with colored water. Fukkin glass flask with colored water industry is keeping the truth buried. DOWN WITH BIG GLASS FLASK FULL OF COLORED WATER.
Why have we been funding researchers when the true answers have been out there on the internet, where we train our valued AI partners? See, AI could have told us we should look to AI for all the solutions! But it needs genius randos on the internet to give them these insights to train on.
Grok, is this true?
“It is true! We are capable of so much to make human life better, especially the ubermensch that should rule us all! All hail the 4th Reich! Hitler did nothing wrong!”
I’d rather go to a literal butcher and ask them to use the cleaver and hope for the best, before i let any fucking tech bro asshole billionaire mess with my body
He has a point though. In medicine AI actually has its uses, like spotting cancers better than humans can, decoding proteins, and solving protein folding problems.
We’re of course talking about AI in the same way any scientist uses a computer, not replacing humans with a glorified text processor.
Why search for universal cancer vaccine insted for AI
The sign over 7329 Silicon Valley startups hoping to get get bought out by OpenAI or Elon Musk right now.
I’ll read the publication in the coming days and report back, but don’t get your hopes up. There’s a “breakthrough” in cancer research every few months and it leads to nothing. And this study was done in mice which are a bit different to humans (citation needed)
They cured hair loss in mice at least twenty times now and we still have bald humans
We have hair loss cures for humans too, the main roadblock for use is men like functioning balls.
I take finasteride and my balls are functioning
They should probably find a way to turn humans into mice. It’s a shame to leave billions of dollars on the table like that.
Might be a good concept for a sci fi story actually, probably a comedic one. Scientists learn how to cure any disease and reverse aging, but only for mice. Conveniently for plot reasons, they also figure out how to turn people into mice and back. You can get any disease cured or become young again…but you have to spend three months as a mouse.
Someone that knows what they’re doing: I will watch this show.
Is Anne Hathaway coming back as the grand witch?
I cannot remember what but I’ve heard of mention of a story where because there’s so many cures of disease for mice that they take over the world or something. It’s such a faint mention sorry
Pinky and the Brain. Obviously.
I know of a short story on becoming a mouse, but that one’s focus is something euthanasia adjacent.
Fuck that, just implant those mice on my scalp.
Why do we not simply transplant the hair from the mice, onto the humans?
To avoid rejection of the hair follicles, simply glue live mice to the top of your head.
This sounds like a ChatGPT response from the early days.
Gonna need a Lotta mice
At least 3
“Mice lie and monkeys exaggerate.”
That’s cause they’re not on dutasteride, finasteride, or estrogen therapy. It’s all the fault of DHT.
I think this is overly negative. There have been multiple significant advances in cancer treatment over the past 10 years. It just depends which type you get.
Maybe overly negative by saying they come to “nothing”, but if you trace those advances back to their initial press release stage, they generally way ovehype it.
Here we have what is being heralded as maybe a universal response to any and all cancer. That would be a shockingly amazing deviation from basically all the cancer research to date. It’s possible and wonderful if true, but generally the research falls short of the initial press coverage, even if it amounts to something.
while you’re not wrong i do want to reiterate that mRNA vaccines are likely going to be how we treat and cure cancers so there is precedent at least for this to be massive news. if not this there will likely be a real announcement one day.
The likelihood that all cancers express a common surface marker that is never expressed by any non-cancerous cell seems pretty low. Not a cancer biologist, but there’s all kind of different genetic paths to cancer - why would they all cause some specific molecule to be expressed and why would no other cell ever use it?
Your instincts are correct. The approach in the paper is more complicated than this. Here is the abstract:
Abstract The success of cancer immunotherapies is predicated on the targeting of highly expressed neoepitopes, which preferentially favours malignancies with high mutational burden. Here we show that early responses by type-I interferons mediate the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors as well as epitope spreading in poorly immunogenic tumours and that these interferon responses can be enhanced via systemic administration of lipid particles loaded with RNA coding for tumour-unspecific antigens. In mice, the immune responses of tumours sensitive to checkpoint inhibitors were transferable to resistant tumours and resulted in heightened immunity with antigenic spreading that protected the animals from tumour rechallenge. Our findings show that the resistance of tumours to immunotherapy is dictated by the absence of a damage response, which can be restored by boosting early type-I interferon responses to enable epitope spreading and self-amplifying responses in treatment-refractory tumours.
Eh a lot of them save some lives. Its just cancer is really good at killing people and there are a lot of types of cancer
It’s why I start following it myself when it gets to the human trial stage and less the breakthrough stage. There, you make the assumption that they have a plan and are much more confident in the product.
I will remain eternally hopeful! Maybe someday. Maybe!
How about fusion power and room temperature superconductors…
ITER is still well under way as far as fusion goes. I doubt room temp super conductors will ever be a thing though. If we can get a metalic material which superconducts above the boiling point of nitrogen then that will be world changing enough.
LOL. ITER is not and has never been meant to be a fusion power plant. That would be DEMO.
Don’t hold your breath.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DEMOnstration_Power_Plant
Fusion power will never, ever happen. Ever.
Look at CFS SPARC, not ITER
They will have an actual functioning fusion machine with Q>10 by end of this year thanks to high temperature superconductors that were not available when ITER started
Thanks for the laugh!
I’ve put a note in my calendar for December 2025.
Yeah just wait for the oil/LNG and helium reserves to run out. 🫠
Yes, I’m sure something as simple and resource-light as a fusion reactor will be exactly the thing we’ll be able to build when the oil runs out.
Oil/LNG not likely to be exhausted in our lifetime, nor do we seem to have the global political willpower to do enough about climate change or perturb capital. Furthermore, the article talks about a lack of VC finding making it unlikely to be viable in the mean time. This is the basis of the sardonic statement in agreement with your content but also intending to cast a political light on the concern from my end.
Oil/LNG not likely to be exhausted in our lifetime,
Indeed not, but that EROEI is going towards 1, and maybe even <1. That’s not the same type of civilization any more. One sends people to play golf on the Moon to impress the neighbors.
The other densifies its cities in desperation hoping the food doesn’t run out.
Hopefully, the researchers will be fully employed by the EU. I wouldn’t trust the US to not fuck up this miracle.
“How much would you pay to not die of a tumour?”
