• PearOfJudes@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    This will no doubt be good for linux pc gaming. On the steamdeck Valve contributed greatly to the opensource proton project.

    • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Linux PC gaming is already here. The only games that don’t work with Proton are if the developers specifically disable support for Linux (via intrusive anti cheat).

  • 🇨🇦 tunetardis@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Yes, Steam Machine is optimized for gaming, but it’s still your PC. Install your own apps, or even another operating system. Who are we to tell you how to use your computer?

    I wonder if this means it’s less locked down the Deck? Like is it kind of an iPad vs Mac situation? When I got the Deck and it was my only CPU travelling around at one point, I tried installing some general tools so I could get some actual work done on the road. Things were fairly heavily sandboxed, though nothing was a total deal-breaker I guess?

    • cron@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It will run on Steam OS like the steam deck is.

      If you have troubles with its protections (like the non-writeable system partition), you can just disable them.

    • rollerbang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah but that lock down is just there to protect most users. Afaik it doesn’t require any heavy workarounds?

    • MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Curious about this too. I love my Steam Deck, but Desktop Mode is horrible. You can’t install apps from the command line because they just get deleted on every update, including CUPS which made printing a huge hassle. You have to jump through hoops to get it to mount an external hard drive automatically. I could never get Discord voice or video chats to actually work. But if you install a separate distro, you lose out on the performance settings that are locked to Game Mode.

      Now that Valve is actually doing a desktop, I’d love to use this as my daily driver so my old ThinkPad can finally rest. I’m hoping Valve will finally fine-tune Desktop Mode so people can actually use it. Or at least not throttle performance if people want to install a different OS. Maybe they could even let us boot directly into Desktop Mode this time?

  • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    That looks really cool! I’ll likely pick up a couple of the new controllers, but I’ve currently got a few mini PCs scattered around the house for gaming so I won’t need a steam machine until one of these craps out on me. But I’m very excited for the folks who will be able to get and enjoy it!

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Ooh that’s completely unnecessary to my use but looks amazing and if I had a big enough place it would be something I’d seriously consider

  • magiccupcake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    20 hours ago

    This thing has pretty interesting hardware:

    The chip almost looks like a cut down AMD Ryzen AI Max 385, but with fewer CPU cores and GPU CUs, but the GPU gets its own dedicated VRAM, rather than sharing it, like it does in something like a Framework Desktop.

    It also seems like it gets a decent amount of power, so likely at higher clock speeds, performance should be pretty good for not that much money. If this is supposed to be a console then it can’t be much more than a PS5 at $550 or PS5 Pro at $750.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I was going to build a gaming pc for the first time in years on Black Friday

      This news put it on hold immediately. I’ll just get the Steam Machine instead, it’s exactly what I’ve wished for: a more powerful Steam Deck without a screen or controller built in.

      AND it’ll run 4k games so I don’t need to downscale to my monitor.

      I’m perfectly fine with it being FSR and only 60fps, as 99% of the stuff I play are single player games anyway.

    • qwestjest78@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Retro Game Corps was estimating $500-$600 and they are defintely out to lunch with that

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      I’m not the best at gauging this but it seems it’s meant to be carried around and plugged into a 4K TV and operate okay at 60fps for most games that multiple people would play while in the same room. The specs seem to align with that. What would the GPU be comparable to? A 6700 (non XT)?

    • Ugurcan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      I’m wondering how much horsepower this stationary device have compared to a PS5 or Series X.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Is it an APU, or is it a “desktop” CPU and GPU on one board? CPU specs are close to the 7600x but downlocked. And with dedicated vram I’d assume the GPU is it’s own separate thing.

      GPU looks like it’s probably a tweaked RX 7400 based on the specs.

      • magiccupcake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        20 hours ago

        This seems to blur the lines between desktop and mobile APU’s, but I would bet that’s it’s closer to a higher clocked mobile chip, than it is to desktop. The only reason I think this is the case is due to the similarity spec wise with the Max 385, and that it’s semi-custom.

        If it was just a 7600x CPU + 7600 GPU I think they would have just said so. It could be separate CPU+GPU, but I think it might be possible that it is built more like a SOC, where the GPU is just given its own dedicated VRAM.

        Looking at the hardware of say a PS5, it has 16 GB of GDRR6, the same as the Steam Machine’s VRAM.

        If everything is soldered anyway, there is no reason to have separate chips for CPU+GPU, especially if that hardware already exists like the AMD Ryzen AI Max line.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          If everything is soldered anyway, there is no reason to have separate chips for CPU+GPU, especially if that hardware already exists like the AMD Ryzen AI Max line.

          Cost is a factor because just as with Steam Deck the two SKUs will only differ in storage space, not in performance. Using last gen RDNA3 is 100% a cost driven choice.

          There was the story recently that AMD demanded a very high minimum order (10 million or so?) for semi-custom versions of the lasest Ryzen and RDNA iterations for some Xbox handheld which is unlikely that handheld would sell.

          By going this route, Valve avoided this. Surely there is spare manufacturing capacity for RDNA3 by now.

          • magiccupcake@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Well I’m probably wrong then, framework said they couldn’t get good performance and maintain signal integrity with upgradable memory for the Ryzen Max cpus, so this is likely discrete Cpu and GPU. Probably all soldered in the same mainboard though.

            • Lumisal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Well I’m probably wrong then, framework said they couldn’t get good performance and maintain signal integrity with upgradable memory for the Ryzen Max cpus

              On the other hand, Framework is run by far right sympathizers and are a few billion short of what Valve’s R&D might have access too.

      • Alex@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I would have thought unified memory would pay off, otherwise you spend your time shuffling stuff between system memory and vram. Isn’t the deck unified memory?

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 hours ago

          What you lose shuffling between CPU and GPU you gain by not having your GPU and CPU sharing the same bandwidth.

          Apple gets away with it by having an ungodly massive memory bus. I don’t think valve is getting a 512 bit memory bus on what’s probably a RX 7400/Ryzen 7600 tier CPU. Both of those combined would be like half that?

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            Apple gets away with it by having an ungodly massive memory bus.

            It’s kind of impressive how effective Apple’s marketing team was towards developers when they started that push towards ARM PCs. A lot of people can remember that having shared memory benefits from not having to copy memory between the CPU and GPU, but barely any of them remember that the only reason it’s feasible is because Apple gave their devices insanely high memory bandwidth.

            On the opposite end of the spectrum, look no further than the original Nintendo Switch. With an incredible 64-bit memory bus and 1600MHz memory clock speed, it was already being bottlenecked by its memory bandwidth 2 years into its lifespan. And that’s counting first/second-party titles like the Link’s Awakening remaster, not even shitty ports of games made for other consoles.

    • Farid@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Dave2D mentioned that Valve said it isn’t aiming to directly compete with consoles, but rather sff PCs. So the price will likely be in the $700-900 range(?)

      • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        You’re not fitting a 6 core processor and a **60esque card in a ssf case for less than $1k I don’t think, so even $900 is competitive

        • SmokeyDope@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I believe that Valve can afford to sell hardware at cost or even a little in the red. Getting people in the steam store ecosystem makes it back and then some in the long term.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Normally that only works if you have DRM that locks the games to your platform, so that people don’t get the hardware at a discount then use it to run someone else’s software.

            But, in Valve’s case, it really has no competitors in the PC gaming space. That might not last forever, but it almost certainly will last as long as this PC / console is around.

            • warmaster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Well, they already did that with the Deck, they earn very little from the hardware. Chances are they’ll do the same.

        • ekZepp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Below this price it will literally “evaporate” in seconds after release.

          • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            It probably will anyway.

            Index and Steam Deck both sold like crazy on release, Valve has already proven itself with their hardware.

            • ekZepp@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Last time they’ve locked the sell on account base. Hopefully they’ll do the same this times too.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The Steam Machine will not be $700 I’m certain. I’m betting around the $300-400 mark. I think most are assuming around $400 based on the fairly weak hardware (8GB of VRAM i+is of particular note), but they make money from sales on the market. I wouldn’t be surprised if they sell it as a loss, because anyone they move off of console to PC is an even larger profit in the long term than any profit they could make from hardware sales.

          Consoles used to be sold at a loss when they were competing more on hardware rather than peer pressure and brand loyalty. Now they’re sold at a profit and they require a subscription to use the internet you’re already paying for, and they get a cut of sales. Valve would be stupid not to try to undercut them.

  • EveningPancakes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Pretty exciting announcement! I was thinking about building a new rig and retiring my current machine with a 3080 to the TV. This might change that.

    What I’m more curious about is how are the folks at Microsoft reacting to this news, since it sounds like the next Xbox was essentially going to be a PC. With Valve doing it first and the fact that the Steam store is so huge, I’m imagining this makes them a bit nervous.

    • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      don’t wait for this, get or build a normal pc that you can change parts anytime you want, you will not regret it.

      • EveningPancakes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        If I were 20 years older, I’d be happy to spec out a mini-ITX build. But with a 3 year old running my life, my time is limited and if the price of this is right, it might make more sense for where my current life is at.

    • jnod4@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Never buying Microsoft after the recall bullshit. Also not paying monthly subscription to enable Internet on my device

  • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    No 4k120Hz. bummer. To be fair, 4k120hz is not a primary market pull.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Eh, that’s not really how it works. It all comes down to the HDMI standard. The HDMI 2.0 used by the steam box has a max officially supported output of 4k60hz. You need HDMI 2.1 to get 4k 120hz - regardless of the capability of your machine.

    • brrt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yeh this will make it a tough choice for me. Have an OLED TV and playing something like Hades 2 in 4K120 would be really nice. Maybe a USBC hub/adapter could do the trick but that’s kinda weird and an extra cost. Definitely dampened my hype for it sadly.

      • mephiska@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        They’re becoming more common though. The Sony oled I just got does 4k120. I’m bummed it doesn’t have hdmi 2.1 though. VRR would have been nice but maybe the hardware is powerful enough it won’t need it.

      • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I do 120 hz on my TV. With PS5 and Xbox I think market for it is bigger than you would think for 120 hz TVs among gamers who picked up new TVs when they got their new console.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Right, like I said, 4k120hz is a very limited market. However, for those of us with living room OLEDs, 4k120hz would be very much appreciated. The couch gaming experience on a 77 inch 4k120hz oled is pretty wicked.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Fair enough. The displayport has limited use though, given how there aren’t many (any?) large 4k120hz televisions with displayport. And let me be clear, that’s no dig against displayport (which is the better standard). As far as I know, certain shady license deals keep hdmi artificially ubiquitous on televisions.

        • vividspecter@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          18 hours ago

          That same shadiness is why AMD GPUs can’t directly support HDMI 2.1 on Linux. But there are workarounds like DP to HDMI converters or using 4:2:0 which is tolerable for non-HDR gaming at least (not so much general PC use).

    • Cricket [he/him]@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah, it seems that they have different color and graphics face plates, but what looked really cool to me was the actual live display front panel showing machine vitals. Someone in comments mentioned that it’s e-ink. Very interesting.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    20 hours ago

    There’s an LED strip, y’all!

    Cool, I hope they keep that idea. 😀

    Anyways it all depends on price/performance is good.
    Previous attempts at 3rd party Steam Machines were not good in that regard.

    • Cricket [he/him]@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The LED strip? It’s on the units that have already been tested and demo’d. What looks really interesting is the (presumably optional) front panel display that shows machine vitals. I’ve only seen that mentioned on some articles and videos.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        What a moronic question to ask on a Steam Deck sub?
        Of course I have, and Steam deck was priced very aggressively, but info on who makes this Steam Machine and how it will be priced is 100% absent here.
        There was a pretty massive attempt at launching steam machines years before Steam Deck, and that it didn’t go well.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_Machine_(computer)

        Following a two-year testing period, Steam Machines and its related hardware were released on November 10, 2015. By 2018, many Steam Machine models were no longer offered on the Steam store.

        How does that raise the question whether I’m aware of Steam Deck???

  • SmokeyDope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The GabeCube looks awesome! The GabeGoggles probably aren’t riddled with spyware. The controller fucks so hard it could be an aphrodisiac. Massive win for valve today.