• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I can see why it was popular with hikers.

    Never know when you might need to start a fire to keep warm.

  • whaleross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think it is fair to assume that if you get electronics branded by a candy manufacturer, you will not get any sort of quality electronics.

    Obviously they shouldn’t be a fire hazard but still.

    • exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I hate that every known company has to suddenly exploit their “brand recognition” and expand into unrelated areas. It’s completely logical from a short-term-profits-from-uninterested-in-anything-besides-profits shareholders but destroys the value people ascribe to a certain brand in the long run. My favourite example: Marshall. They’ve been known for loud and DISTORTED guitar amplifiers for decades. They shaped the sound of so many famous bands. Their amps would last a lifetime and sound great! So someone thought "Hey let’s make shitty headphones and Bluetooth speakers that will - by nature - not be durable, will have to excell in an area that Marshall never was interested in: amplifiers that do not distort the source material and that sound neutral. They had to rely on completely new technology like Bluetooth (which changes it’s standard over time) or be dependent on shitty Internet companies like Spotify (who decide suddenly to brick devices by not supporting them anymore). It’s almost the complete opposite of everything Marshall stood for IMHO. The only thing they have in common is that they make sound. The effect is that people buy products that break, decay or deteriorate on timescales much much shorter than the original brand would be expected. The thing that Marshal will be known for in the future is these speakers or breaking headphones with OK-sound quality. But a few management people will have made a lot of money of course.

    • brsrklf@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yeah, I would never even have considered those if I just encountered them with no other info.

      I can get branding things that are maybe even tangentially related to their main activity, and then there’s a chance they’d want something at least decent. Possibly.

      That one is so random I couldn’t imagine more thought went into it than tacking their logo on the cheapest thing they could buy.

  • _wizard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Bought one of these for my partner for Xmas. Hearing they’re a hazard is news to me. Should I seek a return?

    Edit: was well outside the return window, but contacted Amazon regardless. They’ll credit my account when I purchase a new power bank. Appreciate OP sharing this. Otherwise I could have had some problems.

      • _wizard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        Ha! She scratches that part of my back I can’t reach. She also doesn’t mind (and even requests) seeing me nude sometimes. So yeah, I kinda wanna keep her.

        Thanks for the early morning grammar lesson.

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s hilarious and sad. They outsourced their brand to the cheapest Chinese shit they could find. Stick to making candy, ja?

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It seems like they were on the path to a really great product, but failed due to choosing a poor quality supplier.

    Pricing wasn’t the issue, the power bank’s lightness compared to its power capacity was the big attraction. The crappy version may be crappy, but it also demonstrates proof-of-concept that Backpackers really want it, and would probably be willing to pay a higher price for a reliable, high-quality version. Haribo needs to find a better quality supplier, get the product made correctly, and charge a reasonable price for it.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I’ve just been looking into this and I’m not sure that’s the case.

      It’s seems that this was light compared to others because of the poor design and execution. They cut corners to and used lighter materials which in turn leads to the things found under the CT scans making them more at risk of fire or breaking down over time. It doesn’t seem like they made a revolutionary battery more a cheap one.

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Because the current management have no idea about the identity of the brand. They just want to make money quick but all they accomplish is losing market share.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Lots of companies have wide product lines. The hard part of building a successful corporation is establishing a well-known brand, and once that is accomplished, many companies decide to use that popularity to promote more products that can increase revenue and profits.

        It makes the most sense if the new products are within the same market sector, but it doesn’t have to. Samsung is a perfect example. In Korea, it is possible to work for a Samsung company, live in a Samsung apartment complex, drive a Samsung vehicle, use a Samsung phone, and probably a lot more other stuff.

    • Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Why are they so light? Do they way less than high rated 18650 cells would be for the rated capacity? If so they are probably inflating the rating. As is shockingly common for no name powerbanks. There are very minimal usb boards you can load 18650s into, or attach quad copter cells to, 3d print your own minimal case that suits your needs with the highest capacity and quality cells you can afford.

  • GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It was very funny that haribo of all companies had the lightest battery for the capacity, but all good things must come to an end

  • bonenode@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wasn’t the Haribo power bank popular among hardcore hikers, since it had the best weight to capacity ratio? Remember reading about that somewhere.