• Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Yeah, for most parents, measuring age in months ends right around the one year mark. For obvious reasons.

    That and there’s no way the kid in this cartoon is 32 months. That’s 2 years, 8 months. Walking and talking and likely ~15kg. While not impossible, that would be pretty hard to yeet up to 16.4 mph.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Yeah, for most parents, measuring age in months ends right around the one year mark.

      I know plenty of parents who refer to their kid in months through year two, as you’re hitting milestones every month or two (vaccines, physical/psychological development, age limit for certain pharmaceuticals, etc) and “2 years” is such a big milestone for them all.

      Also, kids who are premature make things extra complicated. I still refer to my son as “13-months adjusted” because if I said “16-months” people would wonder why he was so small.

      • Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 minutes ago

        While I agree with you, I also have to say that a significant percentage of people have no idea of the size difference between 13 and 16 months, and that saying 13 months adjusted is a little silly, but fun! So you do you.

  • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Fun fact: if you take the displacement between your current position and the exact place where you were born, and divide it by your age, you can get your average velocity

    • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      holy shit looks like I’ve been velocitating at an average of 0,024 km/h due south-east. It’s pretty slow

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Also, air resistance was acting on the baby immediately after it left the hands accelerating it. So was she reporting peak speed or the speed several feet away as shown in the frame of the comic. Additionally, she could have easily avoided this ambiguity if she stated the hypothetical speed of the baby being as if it was thrown in a vacuum, but she didn’t do that either. Its just pure laziness really.