‘It is rule 62 of the Olympic Charter that we have to have a condoms story,’ says IOC spokesman Mark Adams

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah sounds like PR at this point. They probably release this press message every year right when viewership and interest drops when the Olympics is halfway done.

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If I was an athlete and there were condoms with Olympic logo branding getting handed out, I would SO hoard them for souvenirs. Can you imagine?

    They’re in Italy. There are farmacie all over the place. They can get store-brand ones.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I don’t see why condom companies aren’t shipping in truckloads for free. You can’t beat that kind of publicity. L

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        I found myself in Italy
        They said we could have condoms free
        All partnered up by two or three
        Everyone partook with glee
        But now none are left for me

        So hearken friends
        My luck portends
        This story ends
        For me unfortunately

        I skied directly into a tree
        Then rolled the dice in the dormitory
        It now burns badly when I pee
        I hope my mom is proud of me
        I only brought home an STD

  • Sabin10@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    16 hours ago

    That’s less than 4 per athlete, not sure why they thought that would be enough.

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They ended up only having a little over 2 per athlete after Condoms Georg took 4,000 for balloon animals.

          • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            You got the numbers backwards. This is one guy who has 6 and a half condoms worth of dingdong.

        • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Why do you specify “male” athlete?

          Unless being used for onanism, it’s one condom per couple, although trios and other combos, and non penetrative sex probably fudge the math a little).

          • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Because we have statistics for how many male olympians are there, but no stats for how many couples are there. It’s worth remembering that olympians don’t have to shack up with other olympians. Many of them brought partners, and I would bet at least a few are asexual.

            My thought was “per olympian penis”, but I admit it doesn’t account for non-olympian penises.

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    18 hours ago

    While I don’t doubt many athletes are being quite active.
    I’d also believe it’s a joke at this point for them to all take as many as they can no matter if they intend to use them or not.

    • Anivia@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      A few years ago an athlete said in an interview that they are Olympics branded condoms, so he stuffed his backpack full of them

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      13 hours ago

      There was an article a few years ago where a few athletes were interviewed anonymously IIRC. It’s a fuckfest. You put a lot of people in peak physical shape together, what are you expecting?

      • Delphia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Also people who by and large havent been out living wild social lives for quite a while. Laser beam focused on one goal. Once you have competed, one way or another the pressure is off and you are surrounded by people who are in the exact same position.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      this is how you get more olympians.

      If enough people are in the market, have egg or sperm donor companies call people who medal.

      considers

      Looking down the road, because my expectation is that sooner or later, we’re going to be doing human genetic engineering, a company getting Olympian genetic material like that might be — as long as they can operate in a legal jurisdiction that doesn’t prohibit human genetic engineering — better off just calling up medalists and licensing their DNA. I don’t think that you can copyright DNA under current US case law, though it might be patentable.

      investigates

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_status_of_genetic_sequences

      As of 2016, genetic sequences were not recognized as copyrightable subject matter by any jurisdiction.[3] The United States Copyright Office’s position is that “DNA sequences and other genetic, biological, or chemical substances or compounds, regardless of whether they are man-made or produced by nature,” are ideas, systems, or discoveries rather than copyrightable works of authorship.[15]: 23

      You might not need to copyright or patent it, though, if you can just keep the changes you make secret. I mean, you get sperm/egg from Random Person, you do your proprietary modifications, you generate an embryo, you implant. I’m not sure how hard it would be for some other company to reverse-engineer the changes by looking at people’s DNA relative to background noise in the DNA.

      searches

      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33095042/

      A large majority of countries (96 out of 106) surveyed have policy documents-legislation, regulations, guidelines, codes, and international treaties-relevant to the use of genome editing to modify early-stage human embryos, gametes, or their precursor cells. Most of these 96 countries do not have policies that specifically address the use of genetically modified in vitro embryos in laboratory research (germline genome editing); of those that do, 23 prohibit this research and 11 explicitly permit it. Seventy-five of the 96 countries prohibit the use of genetically modified in vitro embryos to initiate a pregnancy (heritable genome editing). Five of these 75 countries provide exceptions to their prohibitions. No country explicitly permits heritable human genome editing.

      The thing is that in practice, if you want in vitro implantation, you can probably just travel abroad to a jurisdiction that doesn’t prohibit it, unless countries assert extraterritorial jurisdiction that attaches to their citizens. If someone wants an Olympianized kid, I imagine that traveling abroad isn’t that much additional barrier. Extraterrorial jurisdiction exists, but it is very rare; prohibitions on child sex tourism are one notable example that a number of countries do.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraterritorial_jurisdiction

      EDIT: Replaced the text and citation for the legal overview, as it looks like the earlier link was to a spam site that copied it.

        • HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Eugenics have a bad rep since they were popularized by nazis. But hey - animal rights and identification documents were also initially nazi ideas and they gained traction.

          I just hope, that when eugenics come back to public light again, they will come out of EU (regulated to hell and back) instead of USA or China. It’s one thing to eliminate genetic diseases or such, but completely another thing with steering people into some dystopian genetic hellhole.

        • stephan262@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I have a feeling it’s gonna be a long road, getting from here to there with eugenics. I’d much rather use technology to overcome our limitations.

          • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I would like to overcome my limitations in this fashion. Aside from my tongue and naughty bits, the human body doesn’t offer me any experience that I enjoy.

            • MurrayL@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Wishing to become just a brain in a robot body sadly misunderstands the totality of the human body. It’s been shown that gut biome affects mental health, for example.

              • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                One would assume that a robotic body would have devices and supplement cartridges for that, automatically monitored and regulated. The human body is a machine - but a robotic version would be actually optimally designed, rather than an endless variety of useful accidents. Even better, you can move the brain into different vessel shapes, each built for a particular purpose.

                In any case, converting a fleshy brain’s memories into an computerized format would be preferable. Unfortunately, I suspect that is hard to pull off without being lossy or fatal.

              • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                It would be like Robot Wars, but with a lot more strategies. Rock wall climb? Hover boots, piledriver spikes, gecko skin, and so on. Someone should make an anime or show focused on robosports.

  • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    In France, they gave 300k condoms. That’s 30x the amount they gave here. And they used them all in France, how long the fuck did they think those 10k would last?

    • zikzak025@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      17 hours ago

      For what it’s worth, there are more people at the summer Olympics than the winter ones (~10,500 in Paris and ~2,900 at Milan according to Wikipedia) but still one would think there should at least be 1/4 as much if they’re just looking at athlete numbers alone.

      • coherent_domain@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        16 hours ago

        10k for 20 days of olympic and for 3k athletes that is 10k * 2 / 20 / 3k = 1/3 of a condom per couple per day, that sounds down right reasonable for a bunch of young, perfectly shaped teenagers constantly in celebration mode.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Young, fit and healthy athletes, following intense build up and cumulative training are ready to peak explosively, just about now.

  • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Best souvenir going. But also a lot of young people in peak physical condition. As someone I know commented “everyone is 10/10 from the neck down.”

  • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    10’000 is super low, I remember hearing about one or two hundred thousand in recent years. I guess that was regular and not winter, but still. No wonder they ran out.

    • X@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Winter Olympics, probably fewer people than the summer Olympics, where they had 300k.