My biggest complaint with Live Action Trek vs the two Animation shows is that they seem obsessed with giving us a black ship on a black background. It’s nice to be given a reprieve, even if for only one episode.

  • Briongloid@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve had to download higher quality episodes as the lighting has made higher compression unviewable.

  • zephyrvs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I definitely prefer the darker version, it seems a lot less artificial. To me, the brighter ship looks rendered, as if I was looking at a video games’ screenshot.

      • zephyrvs@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, thanks, I didn’t know that. I’m not much into the animated stuff.

        On first glance it could’ve been from Picard S03 which had a similar aesthetic that didn’t work for me. Too clean, too polished, too much video game.

  • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    100% agree. Still not as bad as the darkness on GoT. The entire damn episode was just a black screen.

  • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve never understood the complaints about lighting on the new treks. We’re watching on big HDR enabled screens now, the lighting is appropriate for them.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        And here I am on a 1080p plasma screen from 2011. Because it just will not die! Which, is a good thing I guess.

        • Ataraxia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah we only got 4k tvs when the 1080p one from. 2008 died a few years back, well it’s not dead, it’s in my office as the crappy spare with a giant smudge at the top. Still usable but ugly. And a line.

          But I love the oled 4k TV it cost less than the 1080 did originally.

      • whofearsthenight@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not even HDR. I’m a TNG fanboy, and one of the reasons is just because the show is bright. The ship sets are bright, etc. Even VOY and DS9 don’t get this quality, and while SNW is probably the best, new Trek gets nowhere close.

      • Captain_Ender@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Oh man. I work in the post industry professionally - on the documentary side, but honestly 10bit HDR (HDR10) and 12bit (Dolby Vision) are the REAL technological leaps in quality NOT 4K/UHD.

        Sure resolution is nice and all, but if you have a capatible TV, we can literally force change your local settings to optimize what we want you to see (people ever notice Dolby Vision settings turn on and grey out your own settings). Being able to change your TV’s color settings natively directly to what we wanted out of the box in post is by far the biggest tech advancement in post to home video in decades. UHD is 4x the pixels but HDR is up to 16 billion more colors. Trust me, it’s worth the upgrade.

            • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              If say I’ve upgraded at least every five years since having my own place and a living room to put it in. I do do a lot of gaming though so having all the latest features are important to me. That being said my parents seem to upgrade theirs as often now.

    • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tons of people don’t have HDR yet. It takes a while for tech to spread, especially when it’s not something many people are gunna go replace a several hundred dollar device for, nor is it necessarily a selling point when shopping for new TVs.

      I thought my 4k smart tv was new enough to have it by default since I bought it in 2019, but it doesn’t.

      • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Really, I’m on my second HDR enabled screen now and that was from 2020, the previous one dated back to 2016 and had it.

        • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, really.

          Maybe you are spending more than I am on your TVs, but even after it became more common it still wasn’t standard apparently. It wasn’t something I looked for or knew to look for, being one of those things that isn’t really a selling point for most people and all.

          The only reason I even know mine doesn’t have it is video games, I just found out a few months back, and frankly I just set the gama high within the game and call it good. Been doing that for many many years. The whites are more blinding than they used to be but that’s about it. Frankly I assumed the problem was with the backlighting.

          I just assumed the media issue was, in fact, a media issue (which it -abso-fucking-lutely is-! If you need a special [even if common] TV device format to correct for your shit production quality by default, ya dun fucked up your production, that’s on you, not the people watching it) and went about my day oblivious as always. :)

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Part of the issue is compression. Most modern compression algorithms bias towards light areas of the picture. On high bandwidth streams, this is no issue. If the stream is highly compressed, the backs can become blocky and details are lost.

      On top of this are suboptimal viewing conditions. Non HDR, background light, or poorly configured (or limited capability) screens. All of these punish the black parts of the image more than the bright.

      • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I can’t speak to the compression on P+ as I’m in the UK so most new Trek is on Netflix, Amazon or the high seas for me and I haven’t noticed much blocking it artifacts even on a 65 inch screen.

        I think I optimal viewing conditions are the biggest issue. People who don’t know how to set up and calibrate their TV or watch on an inappropriate device like a laptop, tablet or phone.

        I’m not surprised directors like Lynch and Nolan get annoyed. They put all the works into making the best cinema experience, then people ruin it by leaving motion-clarity on on their TV or watching on a six inch screen with tinny headphones on the way to work.

      • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re not, it’s time to upgrade. The rest of us shouldn’t get a subpar product because some people aren’t up to date. I mean, TOS was partly designed to help sell colour televisions back in the day, being on the forefront of tech is part of the franchise.

        • Marlowe@meow.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          @NuPNuA
          @damnYouSun

          That sounds a bit rude and pretentious.

          Not everyone wants the latest, highest dynamic, fidelity, wibbly wobbly TV.
          Some are pretty content with colours and not a blurry picture.

          Besides, not everyone can afford one.