• Australis13@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    29 minutes ago

    Apparently I’m off the end of the chart. My last workplace set up had:

    • primary 15" laptop with two external monitors (so 3 screens in use simultaneously)
    • secondary 15" laptop with external monitor (so another 2 screens) when the primary one was tied up doing heavy processing (I was lucky and managed to hold onto my previous laptop when we did the usual rounds of device upgrades whereas most people just returned them to IT to be retired, so I had a spare that I could readily take home for WFH days without messing with my main office setup)
    • a standalone PC monitor (for automation stuff, so the screen was there just for monitoring as needed)
  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 minutes ago

    Kinda reminds me this Game one plays in Theatre which is to Play The Status (you’re given a number between 1 and 10, with 1 having the lowest social status and 10 the highest, and you try and act as such a person).

    Alongside the whole chin-down to chin-up thing, people tend to do more fast and confident moving the higher the status, but the reality is that whilst indeed up the scale in professional environment the higher the status the more busy and rushed they seem, the trully highest status people (the 10s) don’t at all rush: as I put it back then (this was the UK) “the Queen doesn’t rush because for everybody the right time for the Queen to be somewhere is when she’s there, even it it’s not actually so, hence she doesn’t need to rush”.

    There was also some cartoon making the rounds many years ago about how people on a company looked depending on their social status, were you started with the unkept shabbily dressed homeless person that lived outside the vuilding, and as you went up the professional scale people got progressively more well dressed and into suits and such, and then all of a sudden a big switch, as the company owner at the top dressed as shabbily as the homeless person.

  • h4mi@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Oh fuck, I have 5 27-32” monitors, phone, 2 laptops and a wall TV. Based on this I’m half fired already.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Importance, or lack of work contribution? Smaller screen = works less.

    • Honytawk@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      60 minutes ago

      Well, if the company gets fined for mismanaging or committing fraud, who do you think they will fire?

      A scapegoat is very important.

    • nitrolife@rekabu.ru
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The job of people around the CEO is primarily to make decisions. All this huge chain of managers is needed only to aggregate information so that the CEO can make an informed decision. This is how many large companies operate. I would even say that there is a direct correlation between the size of the campaign and the number of monitors at the bottom.

      The flip side of sitting behind a huge monitor is that you won’t stay outside with a huge number of your employees if you make the wrong decision. It’s just a different job.

      • Jännät@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 minutes ago

        Your description is basically of a “spherical CEO in a vacuum”, ie. the ideal and abstract version of how corporations should operate. It has very little to do with reality

    • iglou@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      True for the phone and tablet, but for any sort of computer that is not true

      I work on a laptop with virtual desktops and I am much more productive that way than with a big screen… Or two big screens.

      Everything is in the center of my field of view, I know which VD of my 3x3 grid holds what. It’s much more efficient for me than bigger screens could ever be. And that is not for lack of trying!

      It just depends on the person.

        • iglou@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Faster switch. Think each column being 1-3 and each row as A-C

          B2 is my terminals, B3 is my IDE, B1 is a secondary IDE (for instance, DataGrip), C row is browser windows, A1-2 is temporary, not often used windows, A3 is communication apps. I mostly use A3, B2-3 and C2-3. It’s all mapped in my head so I can instantly switch to whichever VD I need.

          • Owl@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            That’s impressive

            Personally I never needed more than 5 desktops, and I don’t think I could remember what I put on more desktops

            • iglou@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              53 minutes ago

              Haha that’s fair

              Although it’s a habit thing. Most of these are fixed, I never switch them to a different position. So the only ones I have to remember is A1-2 if I am using them, the rest is as easy as knowing where your glasses are stored in your cupboards.

  • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I’m at “iPad and enormous curved monitor connected to a laptop” so I guess I average out to upper-middle management. Which is shockingly accurate.

      • balsoft@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Nah, actually, in a typical company the lower down the ranks you are the less likely you are to be fired, statistically speaking (to a point, of course you’re more likely to be fired while on probation or something).