• grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      The worst part isn’t even the shrinkflation itself; it’s that it fucks with the creme to chocolate ratio because of the square-cube law.

      • Etterra@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        The lying is the worst part. If companies would stop covering up or hiding it, it’d be less infuriating.

  • pedz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    They’re no longer gooey here. They were gooey in the 90ies and early 2000 but at some point the recipe changed now they’re grainy and dry.

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I miss when they were gooey. I got a white chocolate one from the UK this year, and it was kinda gooey. But not what it was like in the 90s.

    • Murse@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      The chocolate also got worse. I used to get excited about these this time of year… now they don’t even make me feel nostalgic - everything about them has enshittified to the point of nonrecognition.

    • stickly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      They also are one of the worst shrinkflation examples ever. Get those tiny eggs outta here.

      It also makes no sense to shrink them if you think about it. Square-cube law means they’re packaging way more milk chocolate per sale, which is almost certainly the most expensive ingredient.

    • HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m sure it boils down to “so you’re saying we can save a few money by simply changing the fundamental characteristic of our product?”

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    These were amazing when they were three for a quid. Like all great British success stories we allowed the yanks to buy Cadbury’s, and now year by year the eggs get smaller or more expensive or cheaper tasting.

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Cadbury was considered quality chocolate in NZ, regularly topped the most trusted brands in NZ lists. Then they tried to replace cocoa solids with palm oil (perhaps 20 years ago), and what feels like overnight they were outed and now are hardly ever mentioned. A local brand took over the quality chocolate spot, and eventually Carbury had to shut the NZ factory.

      I like to think people learn about it when studying marketing / branding degrees.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I like to think people learn about it when studying marketing / branding degrees.

        They learn how much money the execs personally made in the process, and resolve to replicate that “success” for themselves as early and often as possible.

  • obelisk_complex@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Dammit I miss having raw semiliquid sugar encapsulated in more, solid (also, more solid) chocolate-flavoured sugar. Guilty pleasure, plus nostalgia?

    9XWzqeQOuM3PFc4.gif