• Bongles@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 minutes ago

    I know it’d be expensive, but I wonder if it’d be worth it to valve to start producing ram. They’ve certainly got the money to get it started, they are getting heavy into hardware that they can use it in, and they could sell it as well.

    I don’t know if there’s a shortage of raw material or if no one wanted to invest in more manufacturing when AI could crash within a short time.

  • Venator@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    38 minutes ago

    They should also sell it with empty ram slots…

    I’m sure a lot of people have a desktop with more ram than it needs that wouldn’t mind sacrificing a stick or two for a steam machine in thier lounge, especially of they’ve switched over from windows 10 to Linux on their desktop…

    • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Their dilemma is whether to build more RAM factories, which would reduce prices, or not. Knowing when demand slows down would surely help them.

    • keyez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      They’ll just continue with artificial scarcity until they get sued or fined or something but won’t be enough to offset the profits

  • rafoix@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I feel like Valve would have been better off designing a new motherboard and discrete GPU design to facilitate cooling and smaller cases.

    Make a new standard and allow any third party to use it.

    They just wanted to make a new GameCube instead.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Yeah, because everyone agrees the price is too low and more engineering and manufacturing costs are needed to beef it up.

      • rafoix@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        55 minutes ago

        I’m talking about something that is closer to a true PC ecosystem than the locked-in underpowered overpriced DOA system.

        If the price is going to be exorbitant the system might as well be customizable and not limited to AMD’s trash bin.

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I hope China floods the market with cheap RAM and absolutely destroys these scumbag memory companies.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Like they did with EVs in the US?

      Republicans would probably make sure that can’t happen.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 hours ago

        And you end up with the US getting hosed while the rest of us swim in cheap EVs.

      • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The US would be the only country to suffer in this scenario. The rest of the world would be just fine with using cheaper memory while we shoot ourselves in the foot to spite them.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m sure they’ll try to ban Chinese memory for “national security reasons” but the differences here are that memory is much easier to smuggle in, and even if not, them flooding other markets would free up more supply of other manufacturers enough that we should see major price drops anyway. They recently tried banning imports of foreign-made routers and that didn’t seem to actually work out.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      If they have the capacity to do that they would have already been doing it. Chip production is extremely expensive which is why there’s only a few companies doing it.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It will take maybe two to three years before China could do that. The cheap Chinese RAM manufacturers are only starting their production.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That’s true, but after that point the capacity is there and it will be harder to constrain supply in this way after that. After China establishes a major memory player, I assume they wouldn’t want to fall behind after that point either.

  • ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I think legacy american market ram companies need to be blacklisted.

    Once China floods the market, we need to put these fuckers out of business.

    • Burninator05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 hours ago

      There is only one American memory company: Micron. Sk Hynix and Samsung are South Korean.

      Everyone else who sells memory modules in the west gets the actual memory chips from one of those three companies. Beyond that there is only one company that makes the waifers that the chips are made from and I think its Dutch. Definitely European.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I think the wafer is dominated by the Japanese. The Dutch company you are thinking of is ASML and they manufacture 90% of the precision machines that manufacture chips in the world.

  • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    If you disagree on valve share in publishing a game on steam it would pretty much be the same story. Valve is a for profit corporation whos ceo own an entire fleet of mega yachts, they are just as shit as any other corporation.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I can always just not publish on Steam. There are other options.

      What’s happening here with RAM is a cartel

      • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I seriously don’t get this constant “Valve is a monopoly, end them” bull crap. Yes they’re a business. Yes they make money. Sure they’ve got flaws we should tackle. But they aren’t out there trying to shut itch.io down or using legislation to stop you from hosting the game yourself. GOG and Epic aren’t as popular because they don’t provide a strong enough product to pull people away.

  • rafoix@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s hard to believe that it’s just a RAM issue.

    Valve is going full Apple with the SSD upgrade. They’re making a healthy profit from each system they sell.

      • rafoix@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Did you for get that when they upgrade the storage to 2TB they do not also include the 512GB storage included in the low end model?

        • DillDough@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Could be said for literally every single product ever made, come back to reality, holy fucking shit dude.

          • rafoix@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            50 minutes ago

            Valve is making a bad deal worse. By being needlessly greedy.

            I am in the reality where all the other gaming consoles massively outperform it while costing hundreds less and also providing a controller.

    • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Why shouldn’t they? Margins are going to be tight btw, so they’re really not. What they’re really selling is a vehicle for Steam.

      BTW, try putting together a same or better spec build yourself and get back to us with the cost.

      • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        They’re also trying to make Steam OS available to install on any PC, so any argument of “AlL tHeY tHiNk AbOuT iS pRoFiTs” goes out the door there. I think the only struggle right now is getting it to work with NVidia graphics cards or something.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          For like $50-$100 cheaper. And they all ignored the small form factor which could easily cost that.

        • rafoix@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You can build and buy a pre-built PC that easily outperforms the Steam console.

      • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Why shouldn’t they?

        Because they are a for profit company with a billionaire ceo. Making profits it’s their job.

        BTW, try putting together a same or better spec build yourself and get back to us with the cost.

        The price you pay for something in a store is not the same price valve pays for a stock of parts. They buy the same stuff for a lot cheaper and resell it at an higher price to make profits.

  • kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    It’s related to the AI bubble. The AI companies are trying to make it as difficult as possible to get a good PC, because they know they’re cooked if the general public has access to systems that can run AI models locally, so they’re buying everything up as fast as they can in the name of data centers that will never be built.

    As soon as the first one fails, it’s all over. Prices will tumble and memory makers will come crawling back to Valve (and other hardware makers) begging them to buy.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      84
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Let’s not forget that almost all memory is made by a cartel of 3 companies known for price fixing. They’re all being as slow as possible about increasing production capacity.

      • Zoot@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Is that not for good reason though? Only for them really, but if they did ramp up production and then the bubble pops… I wish they would ramp up production, it’s just easy to understand why they won’t.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          16 hours ago

          If there is a demand for ram, which there is in the consumer market, then it shouldn’t be a risk. If DCs get cancelled, then they should have contracts in place for at least a minimum buy, which should offset cost risk. If they don’t have that, then that’s just shitty business. Even still, they can just as easily slow down production if needed. If the bubble pops, either they’ll have inventory that the world will buy and they can throttle back prod, or they don’t have inventory and they will have to throttle prod anyway since demand for DCs as a whole has to be more than just the consumer market.

          Idk, it’s probably just the cynic in me, but I think it’s likely this is just manipulation of the prices, especially given the history of these companies doing just that.

          • Johanno@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            They definitely have contracts that ensure the ai companies buy the ordered amount.

            However building new production factories is expensive as fuck. They know they need to do that. But why buy a factory for billions and sell RAM at a lower price when you just don’t spend billions and earn even more with less RAM

            • Damage@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Because if you don’t do everything possible to continuously improve your business, others may catch up with you

              • Johanno@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Hah. That’s the point where a good cartel comes in and ensures that this is not the case.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yep. Just like how nobody uses Windows since Linux is easily accessible.

      Wait

      • dragonlover@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It’s not the average consumer spending thousands on tokens. Even my work just had a meeting about how “the free lunch is over” now that AI costs are expanding, and they bought their own hardware to investigate hosting local models.

        Linux is widely used in the enterprise world. It’s the home consumer world that doesn’t use it as much and even that is rapidly changing as things enshitify.

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          The general public adopting open tech themselves instead of using corporate options

          Was that not clear?

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Having an option vs not having an option

        Also Linux and Windows are pretty different in use cases and capabilities. Meanwhile, local AI models have a very similar user experience. If hardware was cheaper and people could run better LLMs locally, they wouldn’t pay monthly for it.

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          14 hours ago

          You’re right, the general public doesn’t use Linux due to the lack of ability to browse the web and file their taxes—Windows exclusive functionality.

          • Otter@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            14 hours ago

            In the workplace, there are still a lot of domain specific programs that don’t have Linux support. Companies don’t have much of an incentive to port that stuff over. As for the people who just need a web browser, they probably would use Linux just fine if they could buy a computer at BestBuy that comes with Linux preinstalled

            Compare that to LLM programs, where it’s a matter of “download this app instead of that one, because this one is free and that one costs $25 a month”

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    So maybe try to remember that after the AI bubble burst, and there is more RAM than customers, and it’s the customer that sets the price.

    • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      The ram in the system went from 200 dollars to 600 dollars. Not increasing the price of the console by 400 dollars would have meant scrapping it instead.

      There is literally no choice, the ram would have been sold either way, just to someone else instead.

      • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Valve and its ceo decides the price of their products. Considering valve is a corporation making billions and the ceo owns an entire fleet of mega yachts, arguing that they are directly to blame for the high prices doesn’t sound stupid at all to me. If they are literally swimming in billions their profit cut is high.

        • ReptilianCleric@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Really? The cost of components getting jacked by a supplier is their fault?

          If you really are going to make that claim, you simultaneously lose all credibility by admitting that you are literally arguing in bad faith.

          Shut the fuck up.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 hours ago

      No Gabe, you fucked up with these price hikes

      …in the universe you live in, is there cheap ram?

      can I send you money for some please?

      • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        …in the universe you live in, is there cheap ram?

        Private yachts aren’t cheap either. To buy an entire fleet of these you need to boost your profits as high as you can.

    • muzzle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The component price changed, what was Gabe supposed to do, start manufacturing its own RAM?

      • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The component price changed, what was Gabe supposed to do, start manufacturing its own RAM?

        They are swimming in billions, they could easily lower the profits they make and give it away for cheaper but that’s not their goal.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 hours ago

          What do you think the margins are on this thing? You know how much the components cost, it’s not hard to figure out about how much it costs them.

          Profit margins on consoles are razor thin already, and that’s before the skyrocketing price of components.

          I’m sorry if that means your mom can’t afford to get it for your birthday now, but it is what it is unfortunately.