• LittleBorat3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Looking for ways to keep my old one running as long as possible. it’s that roboroc xiaomi platform and it has been supper easy to get spare parts. I replaced entire wheel sections batteries and such.

    There is a software that replaces the Xiaomi app and that would be the next project.

    No need to phone home to china all the time.

  • Bomnam@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    16 hours ago

    As time goes on I’m hoping more products like this that give what was once only possible via locked down proprietary software a new open and repairable life as theres many new products and tech that I see but could never use unless I’d want to just upload everything I do to whoevers servers and pray that they don’t get breached.

    • stringere@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      15 hours ago

      https://www.opensourceecology.org/gvcs/

      The Global Village Construction Set (GVCS) is a modular, DIY, low-cost, high-performance platform that allows for the easy fabrication of the 50 different Industrial Machines that it takes to build a small, sustainable civilization with modern comforts. We’re developing open source industrial machines that can be made at a fraction of commercial costs, and sharing our designs online for free.

      • Sasquatch@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        okay I clicked quite a few of those, And afaict, only the house is past the “planning” stage

  • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    github
    A user you’ve blocked has previously contributed to this repository.
    look inside
    claude
    click insights
    Top 3 committers is: some org account, another org account but with “.ai” in it, claude

    EDIT: they are not only the top 3 committers, they are the only 3 committers

    EDIT0: repo is all screenshots and markdown files, another one has a trivial amount of code also written with ai

      • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Well there is nothing to be excited about, the entire repo is empty with only a bunch of readme files. Zero code has been written ai or not.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        17 hours ago

        It’s open source. Feel free to write your own software, or pay someone to do it for you.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          16 hours ago

          “Here is a beautiful piece of art. You say it’s just a blank piece of paper? Please feel free to draw your own art on it, and then it will be as I said.”

          I know the real news here is the hardware, but it is still funny…

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            14 hours ago

            The thing is… it’s not blank. It’s painted, but someone complains no that the art is bad, but that they don’t like how it was painted. Well, nobody is forcing you to look at it, you can even paint it yourself.

      • JabbaTheThott@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Don’t use any operating systems and most major websites then because theyre all using a coding agent now. It’s just the way the industry is going at the moment

        edit: Linux uses Claude copilot ffs. It needs to be noted as an AI contribution and needs human review but Linux and Windows definitely use AI coding agents and I guarantee Apple does too. Be in denial all you want. I’m not advocating for them, I’m stating the reality of the industry right now.

    • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I don’t see that as a problem. A vacuum cleaner isn’t critical infrastructure and shouldn’t be connected to the internet, so no security concerns. Worst case scenario it ruins your carpet. Majority of the work here will be done on hardware side it seems.

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        There’s 0 code thus far. What “code” does exist is all just readme.md for various ros modules. Getting upset about the guy using ai seems a little premature.

        • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          There’s another repo with a Docker file and that was all written with Claude too for some reason. Though I don’t see why in the ever living fuck this would need Docker.

          Also, why are we even getting excited over a vacuum cleaner existing as a pile of markdown files talking about it? There are lots of these, actually.

          • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Not sure what’s up with docker.

            I understand some excitement though. Initially reading this I thought it was a more mature project that it is and something like this that’s fully open source would be a nice change from all the projects that talk about replacing firmware but then turn out to run on one version of hardware that hasn’t been sold in at least five years.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          They don’t have any code yet but 3 slopgen accounts are already connected. It’s worse, it’s actually worse.

      • Nalivai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        And 3 accounts are already “contributing”. That’s not better. It’s worse.

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I just want one where the storage the vac empties out into is on the side so it can slide under a couch.

    These things take so much damn space and for some reason they didn’t figure out there is a bunch of real estate underneath shit.

    • Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Delete this comment, sell idea to a company, profit! But in all seriousness this is a smart idea.

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      3real5me…the amount of time and money needed to make even simple projects robust and truly usable, and not just a janky DIY job that needs to be used in just the right way or it’s wonky is always more than you expect. No matter how many times you’ve been through the process.

        • Axolotl@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Yeah, i mean, that’s just how developing anything works, i think it shuld be something that people have to explain more when they introduce someone to the DIY world, if you expect to finish a product on the first iteration or the first few, you either gonna fail or you have set a low bar

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think my device is easy and intuitive to use. The user wants video instructions and refuses to use my thing otherwise :(

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I would actually be more interested in custom firmware for our old touch-and-go Roomba. The hardware is great, fully modular, did even survive a round of cat barf and washing. But the firmware is buggy and does inefficient vacuuming rounds.

  • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    19 hours ago

    While this is a cool idea, if you read the article, it’s only an idea. Seems like nothing but a reference design has actually been made. Hoping to see it progress, but we shall see.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yeah, over the years I’ve learned to not hold my breath about any interesting announcement. Though I’m at the point now where I don’t really care either way and feel like pointing it out for any specific project just feels overly pessimistic. Just let them cook or contribute knowing there’s never a guarantee it’ll come to fruition.

    • TDCN@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      As i understand it Valetudo is not actually firmware to control the robot. It is a “parasite” that makes the existing robot firmware belive it is connected to the cloud which is very different from actually controlling and navigating the robot. However, in terms of homeasistant integration it could be worth getting inspired.

      For a control operating system ROS could be something to consider. When I used it 10 years ago the project was quite unstable since tools changed constantly and it was overly complicated to work with, but a lot of development has happened since so maybe worth considering. I wrote this before reading the article

    • adeoxymus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I love valetudo!

      But I also think there should be more open source robotics, and a robot vacuum feels the right topic as a starting point.

      I think I also saw someone that wanted to make a robot grass cutter.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Looks pretty cool but a very short list of compatible devices. Also, what they consider “budget options” are not what I would consider “in my price range”. LoL 😂

    • This is why I love foss software. Their is some guy hacking away at some very specific problem in his own time and he shares it with the world for free. You will have never heard of this problem or even contemplated its existence but once u know some foss developer has solved it going back to a world where it doesn’t exist is just a little bit duller.

      • Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I’ve got to share time on the 3d printer now she’s got the hang of it, we don’t have room for 2. But it’s still great to see!

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Oh the physical part is all me, she just wants to do the computer stuff lol. But yeah she’s been interested in some projects where she can program and I can build.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    the robot vac i have had for 3 years is the dumbest machine. goes over the same areas multiple times a session. has a manual steer setting but if i gotta steer it, whats the point of robotics? finally gave up and got a dust mop.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      At the risk of sounding like an ad, roborock (xiaomi) makes fantastic vacuums. Great navigation, great cleaning performance, obstacle avoidance (cables, socks, etc) depends on the model.

      They do offer a meter interface if you want to have it offline, but I’m quite happy with the (cloud based) app, allows a bit more control.

      It integrates with home assistant but it sometimes goes “unavailable”, the matter integration is a bit more stable for that.

      I sure other manufacturers also have great ones, check “vacuum wars” on YouTube.