Im also a gun vegan, a car vegan, a facebook vegan, an exercise vegan (unfortunately), a windows vegan, … just not actual vegan.

I feel like thats a bad way to use the word vegan.

“Newspaper which uses AI to write its articles concocts derogatory term for people who doesn’t use AI”

This makes about as much sense as calling Linux users “Windows vegans”.

Choosing to not use AI isn’t some wacky contrarian position, it’s a tame position that can easily be justified. (Don’t want to use AI? Then don’t.) If anything, trying to assert that constantly using AI for everything would be the new normal is the wacky position.

I hate the term AI vegan. I prefer mistechnitinoimosyne. More classy.

Missed opportunity to coin the term “Aitheist” Fools.

“refuse” lol as if there were a general requirement to use this shit

how to belittle and minimize a very serious thing: call any protesters of it a " ___ vegan"

The better term would be “LLM gobbling fuckheads” for those who use that stuff and believe it has anything to do with “AI”

We don’t need to invent new terms, like ‘AI Vegan’, when we have a perfectly good term already: Butlerian Jihadist.

“AI vegans”? I knew guardian was already bought by tech bros, but wtf is that phrasing lmao I dont use AI either, simply because it is wrong more often than not and I am still capable of googling myself, but being cautious equals to being vegan in tech bro eyes?

There has to be a catchier name than AI vegans…

Journalists constantly trying to be the origin of a term.

I don’t use ai either. But because it’s fuckin stupid. It’s not even ai. It’s a glorified sorting algorithm.

No an Image generation is not ten times the impact pf a Google search, a ChatGPT query is. Image generation is probably a lot more.

Abstaining from a thing does not make one a vegan. That’s not how any of this works.