• Nightsoul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I mean, this has been known about for pretty much all smart vacuums.

    But who the fuck is going to use the layout of your house for anything?

  • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If you have a robot vacuum, and the robot vacuum makes a persistent map (as opposed to the older “dumber” models that just bounce around randomly), they all send that map back to some remote server. In fact, most of those robots won’t even enable the mapping feature unless they’re connected to the Internet (which is absolute bullshit considering most of those robots generate, process, and store that map locally, so there’s literally no reason to send it off somewhere).

    So your options are to just use the robot without ever connecting it to the Internet and be happy with the reduced featureset, root the robot and install Valetudo on it, or just vacuum manually. But until manufacturers are forced to let us actually own the smart devices they sell is, under no circumstances should you ever let one touch the Internet.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’ve been looking into robotic lawnmowers, and they’re basically the same. The more primitive ones have a hall effect sensor under their snout feeling for a wire you bury around the edge of your yard, and do the “go until you hit something, turn a random amount, repeat until low battery, follow perimeter to dock” or they require phoning home in some way, shape or form.

    Meanwhile, some guy’s got an open source system that runs on a Raspberry Pi on the mower itself.

    I guess I’m willing to believe that some of the LIDAR or camera-only guided mowers need some serious processing power to create the maps they use for guidance around the yard, and that’s more practical to do on the company’s servers than on the device itself…except not really; we’ve got decently powerful ARM SoCs that don’t cost much, don’t take a lot of power to run, and can do that job. The reality is, you can’t get a pedometer app for a smart phone that doesn’t broadcast sensor telemetry to two continents these days.

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I remember about news of some Israeli intelligence operatives who jogged around their HQ only to be outed by their tracks on Strava.

    • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Worst case, it’s sold to ICE or some other fascist regime.

      Every single government that has a contract with Palantir for Gotham or even whatever the fuck they’re doing with the UK NHS data, is reason enough to know this kind of shit is a bad idea. The entire existence of Palantir makes this kind of shit a bad idea by default.

      Even if they’re not using lavender or where’s daddy (yet), I do not want them to have a detailed layout of my home, in addition to all the other information already being collected.

      If the day comes when any government needs to crush civil unrest, Palantir gives them an easy button to weaponize your data against you.

  • 87Six@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    164
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Since I dont see it mentioned, the company is

    iLife

    iLife makes vacuums that map your house and can be remote controlled

    Just so we are clear. You should all up your name and shame game.

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Someone — or something — had remotely issued a kill command,” he wrote.

    “I reversed the script change and rebooted the device,” he wrote. “It came back to life instantly. They hadn’t merely incorporated a remote control feature. They had used it to permanently disable my device.”

    In short, he said, the company that made the device had “the power to remotely disable devices, and used it against me for blocking their data collection… Whether it was intentional punishment or automated enforcement of ‘compliance,’ the result was the same: a consumer device had turned on its owner.”

  • ByteOnBikes@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    1 day ago

    In addition, Narayanan says he uncovered a suspicious line of code broadcasted from the company to the vacuum, timestamped to the exact moment it stopped working. “Someone — or something — had remotely issued a kill command,” he wrote.

    “I reversed the script change and rebooted the device,” he wrote. “It came back to life instantly. They hadn’t merely incorporated a remote control feature. They had used it to permanently disable my device.”

    In short, he said, the company that made the device had “the power to remotely disable devices, and used it against me for blocking their data collection… Whether it was intentional punishment or automated enforcement of ‘compliance,’ the result was the same: a consumer device had turned on its owner.”

    They kill switched it remotely. Yikes.

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      All IoT devices do this to keep you from blocking their data collection. They won’t work reliably without a regular ping home. They lock up if they can’t phone home frequently enough.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Haven’t had one yet. Block all IOT devices from internet all work fine.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Tapo’s sockets don’t - in fact they explicitly have a ‘local only’ function. All you lose is control outside your home network.

        Tuya on the other hand will start leeching off the fucking Bluetooth of your pairing device if you hobble them.

        • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          tapo cameras do. mine all went offline and factory reset themselves after not having internet access or even accounts for several months, all at the same time.

          • Taleya@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Haven’t experienced that one - but your statement was “all iot devices do that” (emphasis mine)

            And i haven’t even touched on Zigbee…

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      More likely it killed itself after not being in contact with home base. Since it worked fine elsewhere

  • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    I used to be on a mailing list where American companies offered money to people in the third world for menial manual tasks. Like sending pictures of random crap from different angles and such. One time I got an email offering 4 of these things and $100 and all I had to do was put one of them in my home and use it for a week and give the other 3 away. Goes without saying they’re clearly a privacy nightmare.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah that issue has been around for at least a couple years now. Luckily my robovac doesn’t have WiFi or bluetooth