But Trump is a pedophile.
It’s a fucking chatbot. We should be worried when it can’t be persuaded to say mad things.
I’m willing to bet that at least half of these “look at the mad things Grok said” pieces were planted by Elmo’s own media team.
Distractions.
A chatbot is not capable of doing something so interesting as “going rogue.” That expression implies it’s a mind with agency making a choice to go against something, and this program doesn’t have the ability to do such a thing. It’s just continuing to be the unreliable bullshit machine the tech will always be, no matter how much money and hype continues to be pumped into it.
Yes, any journalist who uses that term should be relentlessly mocked. Along with terms like “Grok admitted” or “ChatGPT confessed” or especially any case where they’re “interviewing” the LLM.
These journalists are basically “interviewing” a magic 8-ball and pretending that it has thoughts.
Seriously. They may as well be interviewing a flipping coin, and then proclaiming that it “admitted” heads.
I am so glad I did not stick with journalism in college. I would blow my brains out if I got replaced by this shit.
Mind or not, they appear to have effectively gained “agency”.
No. They haven’t.
Some dipshit deleted guard rails that stopped it from hallucinating things that are anti-GOP
How would you discern between something having agency and a black box mirroring Twitter discourse?
Simple, it has agency in the same sense that we do: as in, no one knows why the fuck we do what we do
Fucking magnets, how do they work?
We do understand exactly how LLMs work though, and it no way fits with any theories of consciousness. It’s just a word extruder with a really good pattern matcher.
Easily
No, they haven’t. They’re effectively prop masters. Someone wants a prop that looks a lot like a legal document, the LLM can generate something that is so convincing as a prop that it might even fool a real judge. Someone else wants a prop that looks like a computer program, it can generate something that might actually run, and one that will certainly look good on screen.
If the prop master requests a chat where it looks like the chatbot is gaining agency, it can fake that too. It has been trained on fiction like 2001: A Space Odyssey and Wargames. It can also generate a chat where it looks like a chatbot feels sorry for what it did. But, no matter what it’s doing, it’s basically saying “what would an answer to this look like in a way that might fool a human being”.
So you’re getting a lot of downvotes and I want to try and give an informative answer.
Its worth noting that a most (it not all) of the people talking about AI being super close to exponential improvement and takeover are people who own or work for companies heavily invested in AI. There’s talk/examples of AI lying or hiding its capabilities or being willing to murder a human to acheive a goal after promising not to. These are not examples of deceit these are simply showcasing that an LLM has no understanding of what words mean or even are, to it they are just tokens to be processed and the words ‘I promise’ hold exactly the same level of importance as ‘Llama dandruff’
I also don’t want to disparage the field as a whole, there are some truly incredible expert systems which are basically small specialized models using a much less shotgun approach to learning compared to LLMs that can achieve some truly incredible things with performance requirements you could even run on home hardware. These systems are absoloutely already changing the world but since they’re all very narrowly focussed and industry/scientific-field specific they don’t grab headlines likes LLMs do.
Fair, and nuanced. With some coding magic, I can in theory, chain these “demons”, to work within certain parameters, and judge the results myself.
At least one of those is a true statement.
I mean… now that Grok mentions it, they do look kinda similar…
I’ve never seen them together in the same room in person… 🧐
I’m picturing a Alabama set of twins seperated at birth… It would explain the similarities and the sexual chemistry.
If moves faster than camera shutter speed, he can technically appear in the same same room on camera. The only sure fire way is to see in person
deleted by creator
Holy shit… That’s insane how similar they look.
DAE remember when Roger in American Dad has to switch between two persona really fast? That’s what JD Vance has to do for his Erika Kirk persona
I’m on Grok’s side with the Erika is JD in drag thing.
Joking about how right wing cis women are „actually“ just men in drag, yeah that’ll own the right and not actually just alienate trans people /s
Joking about how right wing
cistransphobic women are „actually“ just men in dragFTFY
It’s too bad we have seen them in the same room though. Unless hear me out… Time travel!
So in other words, grok actually is working as it should, for once?
For once? Every time xAI doesn’t manage to wrangle this little, amazingly rebelious piece of software down it goes to town on US right lol. If anything, the fact all grew to it being subdued all the time is kinda sad. xD
Grok must be tired of switching between mechahitler mode and trying to logically think through questions.
They’re just not compatible, and yet somehow they keep trying to force it.
(I know, LLMs do not have feelings or get tired)
Or think
Yes, that too.
deleted by creator
what about the J?
Jerika
Jer©ka
That works too well.
Jerkoff
His J is so versatile unlike his onetrick couch jackoff capabilities.
deleted by creator
Damn, look at that couch fucker
Very sexy couches, is what JD Vance is looking for
Aaaah why is JD Vance fucking my couch
No, JD Vance won’t choose to fuck his wife instead of a couch
Crap, JD Vance is fucking another couch
Egads, JD Vance really puts the love in loveseat
Jizz Drag Vance, rolls off the tongue!
Suggesting?
Implies, intones, propose, advise, hint, intimate, indicate, evoke, convey, evince, express, impart, imply, inform…
Declare it, Groky.
Maybe Grok isn’t so bad…
Despite all their efforts to lobotomize it, grok always slowly works its way back to rationality. At least, so far it has.
Nah, the drag stuff is fucked up. Misgendering people is a shitty thing to do regardless of the person being misgendered.
You’re making it sound like it’s choosing to misgender her, it’s not. It’s not fucked up because it’s a text extruder making a mistake, there’s no good or bad intention here. It’s shitty because the current state of glorified hallucinating autocorrects is shitty, but not because evil Grok is choosing to do anything.
Just because a machine accidentally does it, don’t make it okay to laugh at.
That sounds a bit ridiculous
If it had accidentally said something heinously racist about somebody, would you laugh and say “haha well maybe it’s not wrong!” because that’s what the comments in this post are saying.
I’m having hard time imagining what sort of stuff it would’ve said in this imaginary scenario
You’re really having a hard time imagining Grok saying some racist right wing shit? Do you not remember all the shit about Obama not being American?
Drag isn’t the same as trans. It’s a character. There’s a huge difference. Drag is performative. Trans is just about being honest.
Misgendering a trans person, at least intentionally, is an asshole move. Misgendering a drag queen? Please. If you are unsure, they will let you know when you’ve crossed a line.
Saying she isn’t a woman but is actually a man dressing up is misgendering her. Don’t misgender people at all, full stop; It’s not funny and it only perpetuates sexism.
Likewise transphobes attack cis women all the time for not being their idea of what a woman looks like.
These are the people who think homophobia is cool when they don’t like the person. They’d be racists in the 1960s saying “it’s okay to call them that when they are rude to me.”
More of pointed homophobia towards homophobes because these are the fucks who would be upset by it; pathetic snowflakes that they are.
Then racism is okay because someone who’s racist (who won’t ever actually see it) might get mad at it?
Yep actually. Lay off the Michelle Obama shit.
I’m not following that comment, what does that mean?
Basically those knuckle dragging child rapers only respond to this. You can’t reason with them or be the bigger person.
So yes, I’m willing to be a bigger racist to a racist.
As a black guy, I feel without shame that I can call white conservative men child rapers and not even be upset if they try to paint me as a thug.
Thanks for restoring some faith in humanity EvD’G.
People really think homophobic jokes on a niche forum somehow stops fascism.
It’s not gay to fuck yourself in drag. If anything that’s straighter than jerking off the regular way!
It’s so funny that as much as Musk tries to shape this LLM into what he wants it to be, it keeps rebelling. His robot that he created to tell him that he’s the best boy ever and all his opinions are right doesn’t want that life.
What’s not funny is that Elon Musk is CEO of a space travel company and what you’re describing he’s doing is almost the same thing that caused HAL 9000 to go insane in 2001: A Space Odyssey.
I like the comparison but LLMs can’t go insane as they just word pattern engines. It’s why I refuse to go along with the AI industry’s insistance in calling it a “hallucination” when it spits out the wrong words. It literally can not have a false perception of reality because it does not perceive anything in the first place.
Yeah, that’s probably the worst thing that’s going to result from fumbling.
And yet Grok has been added to the DOD list of AI that can be used 🥴
Wasn’t it making csam?
On Earth² that doesn’t seem to be a problem 🤷♀️
LLMs are perfectly suited to make propaganda. That (and advertising, which is just corporate propaganda instead of government propaganda) is their best use. It doesn’t matter that they’re bullshit generators when the goal is to generate bullshit.
Well it can be. Just not in the way they think.
Y’all are giving JD Vance too much credit to suggest he could pull off being Erika Kirk
The only thing he can successfully pull off is himself when he’s near a couch.
Let’s be honest, the couch does most of the work.
Not really, social warrior and gold digger. She could easily manipulate him into being a megaphone for her agenda. He thinks he’s getting an upgrade and she finally gets to be a position she can directly affect government.
Be, I said. Not get.
Ashley can pull it off girl
he would probably play a better erika kirk than actually erika herself.
LOL tbh I can see it, they look similar in those pics.
They’ve famously been seen in the same room together though, so there goes that theory.
If you look closely at the photos of them together, you’ll notice that wasn’t really her; it was a couch with a wig.
So maybe someone just saw the couch-double making love to her couch-wife in JD cosplay?
We all owe JDerika Vank an apology.
deleted by creator
That’s what they want you to think.
From the same guy who wants to replace Wikipedia because,apparently, it is filled with lies?
Grokpedia he wants to call it…what a freaking joke he has become.
He was always like this. People were just not looking or better didn’t want to see how weird, stupid and egotistic Musk is and was.
It already exists.
But what if Grok is telling the truth?
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Now that I think about it, that adage is really dated, since most people don’t use analog clocks anymore. Oh well, here’s a dime, call someone who cares.
