• njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    42 minutes ago

    I looked up a similar article without a paywall:

    https://www.gamespot.com/articles/ousted-subnautica-2-devs-allege-krafton-asked-ai-how-to-avoid-paying-bonus/1100-6536280/

    “Krafton recently declared itself to be an “AI-first company,” which led Unknown Worlds to issue a statement indicating that Subnautica 2 will not feature generative AI.”

    The “AI first” shit is pure gold. I love the instant karma. Why are these CEOs throwing their money, reputation, etc. away on AI? Either they are even stupider than I thought, or the tech bros have some kind of massive blackmail machine they’re using to take over everything and puppet all the CEOs.

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      Either they are even stupider than I thought, or the tech bros have some kind of massive blackmail machine they’re using to take over everything and puppet all the CEOs.

      I think it’s a little of each.

      The ones not being blackmailed are desperately trying to look like they’re impactful enough to blackmail.

      • njordomir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 minutes ago

        I know the type. They list themselves exclusively on job search sites for high earners like “Ladders”, they don’t listen to their employees ever because they’re a subhuman resource, they are first in line at every ceremony or circle jerk meeting, but nowhere to be found when actual work needs done, they spent the last few years bringing up how badly they want to go back to the office full time, and they unironically speak in corporatese even on Christmas. They like sports teams because they’re popular and a good segway, not because they care about the team, they view it as their duty to keep the ranks broken down and working hard in fear of their jobs.

      • hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 hours ago

        At the moment this is a win for the workers. They should get their full share of the payout, now. The main danger is now their parent company may be hostile to them (or even try to close them) until the parent company CEO gets replaced.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 hours ago

          until the parent company CEO gets replaced.

          One would hope pulling such a boneheaded move ought to make that happen rather quickly.

          Of course, if this CEO has been there for more than a year or 2, he would probably get a golden parachute for more than the value of his fuckup…

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 hours ago

        oh god, sounds like Krafton were already assholes. I bet the put the other 250 in and sell it in pieces.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This is the kind of successful entrepreneur we’re supposed to be looking up to, people.

    • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Exactly, the fact this dude at Krafton can sign 250 million dollars deals but is also dumb enough to think a ChatGPT lawyer knows better than his own lawyers… It goes to show that many powerful people were just lucky or inherited their wealth but are definitely not successful because they are smart.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        definitely not successful because they are smart.

        I mean, “smart” is a relative term. They were smart enough to find the money hose and latch onto it. But the skills necessary to schmooze $250M out of a creditor are fundamentally different than the skills necessary to manage a workforce or meet the terms of the contract.

        You can call it the Peter Principle or the Principle-Agent Problem or any number of other business short-hands for “skills mismatch”. The bottom line is that “meritocracy” in a capitalist system boils down to rent-seeking effectiveness. That’s the skill set that is rewarded. And it produces legions of people who train and compete for the opportunity to maximize rent-seeking returns.

        This guy fumbled the ball in a spectacular fashion. But I have no doubt he’ll get back on his horse and find another pool of labor to extract wealth from. Because, if he’s a CEO, he’s honed the skills needed to do exactly that.

        What we get to mock him for is his failure, not his decision. If he’d retrieved a useful answer from the ChatGPT answer lottery, or the courts had been stacked with his friends such that any answer he pulled was considered the right one, he’d be hailed as a business genius on the front page of the WSJ rather than scoffed at in the back pages of 404media.

        • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          41 minutes ago

          Exactly “being smart” and “acting smart” are two different things. Usain Bolt is the “fastest” man on Earth, but if he’s just chilling on the couch watching TV, I can run right past him.

          Same with these ivy league CEOs, they probably (not necessarily) were smart when taking their tests in school, but if they just leave the fate of their company to chatgpt responses, they’re acting as dumb as possible at the current moment.

      • sleepundertheleaves@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Yep. And I’d go further. Class mobility in the West is dead. No matter how smart and skilled and competent you are, you will never be one of the ultra-rich - and no matter how ignorant and incompetent one of the ultra-rich is, they’ll never lose enough money to become “merely” well off. The entire broken system, one that’s designed to funnel money from the working class to a handful of ultra-rich families, will keep making the rich richer no matter what they do.

        We have a billionaire caste, not a billionaire class, and this story makes it painfully obvious.

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Throughout pretty much all of human history it’s been apparent that the “nobles” class has been, at best, more trouble than they’re worth; and at worst, the instigating spark that creates a nation-destroying blaze.

          It should come as no surprise to anyone who has read a history book that the American nobleman is equally as useless and destructive as his counterpart anywhere else.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 hours ago

        This is why the LLMs are so popular with execs, they are the ultimate yes men. They will feed ego and purport to give a strategy that will support any dumbass idea without challenging them.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 minutes ago

          That’s half of it. The other half is that these execs think that everybody under them is some kind of replaceable cog in the machine with no special skills. They don’t think their job could be replaced by AI. But, they think everyone under them is so unimportant that their job can be done by AI. They’re managers. They don’t know how to do the work of the people they’re managing. They can’t tell the difference between an accurate result given to them by someone with knowledge and expertise vs. one created by a slop machine that generates plausibly realistic text.

          If their $1000/hour lawyers tell them one thing, but the bullshit machine tells them something different, they trust whichever one gives them the answer they prefer.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Luck is a factor, but the differentiator is that they have the. Isplaced confidence and drive to just do what they want first. Then the luck let’s them get away with it. It’s kind of like if you get a million people to flip a coin 50 times. Some of them will get all 50 to be heads. So with billions of people in the world. Some have this drive to be on top, misplaced confidence, luck, and situational oportunities (also a good part luck) to end up able to sign 250 million dollar contract. None of that actually requires they have a clue. Sometimes they do, but it isn’t required.

        • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          if you get a million people to flip a coin 50 times. Some of them will get all 50 to be heads.

          Flipping a coin 50 times has 1.1 quadrillion possible outcomes, only 2 of which are all heads or all tails. I think you’d need more than a few billion to reliably see those results.

          • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I think though, you get the point.

            Now here is a bonus question for you. If I give you a coin and ask you to flip it 20 times, and they all come up heads. What are the odds that if you flip it again it will come up heads?

            • wabasso@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I think it’s higher than a 50% chance of heads, because you have evidence for it being an unfair coin.

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            yeah that’s over a one in a billion chance to get all heads in just a million tries.

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      pea-brained gibbering dicksplat

      That sounds something from one of those “pick 3 insult generator” sites :p

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    These days chatgpt is pretty much the worst major model, so he couldn’t even get that part right.

  • 13igTyme@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Krafton did promise to be “AI first” for everything going forward. If you haven’t already blocked the publisher on Steam or other services, do so now.

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Good point!

      For others doing the same, there’s a little gear icon on the punisher page, with an option " Ignore this creator."

  • bad1080@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    i bet the first thing he looked into is how to push the responsibility for his failure onto chatgpt