• Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I wish i could not buy, again, the Playstation and Nintendo consoles that i don’t own.

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I got a switch1 so I could play Monster Hunter Generations Ultimate, after putting hundreds of hours into MHGen on the DS. I really wish I could have just played MHXX on the DS instead of having to go to a Switch, but alas. I tried some other games on the Switch, but I just can’t do it. My friend lent me BotW and I got until the part where I led the cave and the framerate dipped to like 15. I snagged it on the computer and played through the whole thing at 1440p/144FPS. Every Switch game is so much better on the computer, and the online capabilities (or lack thereof) are horrid. Since then, Nintendo has quadrupled down on anti-consumer stuff. No good.

      Last Sony console I got was a PS3, because the PS4 was horrid with its performance and nightmare load times. I stopped getting consoles after that, even though the PS5 and latest XBox have good performance and much smaller load times. I’m just done with them, and my decisions are reinforced every time news like this comes out!

      I still fuck with old consoles, though. I need to invest in an upscaler or any device that’ll let me play them on my modern screens, since I don’t have room in most of our comfy places for my CRT at the moment.

      • emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Good news, it’s not just the switch. Pretty much every other console game is also better on PC, even just because of the existence of pause/save state functionality. That’s not even getting into romhacks or retro achievements or any of the other major benefits to emulation.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I sell honey at a local garden market. My sales went up 460% once I started labelling it “A.I. Honey”. /s

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Steam’s records show that an overwhelming majority of playing time is going to older games. The market may not be large enough for Sony to care.

          • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Ah. I was wondering exactly what you meant. Yup. There definitely is a market for good games, new or old. I wouldn’t make the mistake of trying to correlate that to any trend in taste for indie or corporate, other than who is giving better value and a more fun experience… try not to think like corporate execs who don’t have a fucking clue what fun is and seeing gamers as consumers.

            • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Corporate execs may not know what fun is, but they know what makes money. Right now, everything in the computer gaming market points to new games being more expensive than what the market will bear.

              They probably see the PC market as too competitive to compete in and want to invest in technology which makes new games cheaper to make. So, Sony will abandon a market it can’t make money in and will invest in a technology which can hopefully churn out assets for their new games, which will lower development costs.

              • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                So then we are back to where we started, and people need to stop buying into advertising and garbage. Line doesn’t need to keep going up.

                • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  And don’t be surprised when corporations stop producing for a platform when it no longer makes them money.

          • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            If the new games were any good, people would play new games. Enshittification + survivorship bias = people play old games.

            There’s good news though. Sony has PLENTY of old good games that aren’t on steam. They could just release them. Making a PC port of a great game is much easier and cheaper than making a great game

            • Feyd@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              If the new games were any good, people would play new games.

              The real problems are that games aren’t finished when they come out. Even small games that aren’t broken generally get patches to make them somewhat better in the first year. And games tend to go on sale after around that long. So I just wait and pay less for a better game.

              The combination of getting burned by Anthem straight up crashing on my hardware until after my friends were already done with it making it a complete waste of money and the horror of getting my witcher-superfan friend cyberpunk 2077 on launch as a gift and it being complete garbage made me never want to buy a newly released game again.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            The thing is, they could release on Steam, and continue doing so for years, and they’d continuously build up a catalogue of older games that still sell. Sure, the first year probably isn’t going to do as well on PC as they expect from consoles. Later years will probably do better though.

            Oh well though. Sony doesn’t really make anything I want to play anyway. I’m not that bothered by them making bad decisions. I’d rather them be smart about it, but honestly I don’t really care.

            • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              This could be them being smart about it. Compared to various Xbox models, the PlayStation models were generally custom designed to a specific set of hardware and software criteria that aren’t fully mirrored on Windows PC. It is a non-zero cost to convert and support.

              There may be some individual success, but the aggregate may be a money losing proposition. At that point, why support a market that is only costing them money?

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Compared to various Xbox models, the PlayStation models were generally custom designed to a specific set of hardware and software criteria that aren’t fully mirrored on Windows PC.

                You’re talking about the devices that can fully be turned into a PC. Sure, the hardware set is a specific thing (just like Xbox, though I guess they have two versions). However, the only thing that makes it not work like a PC is the software.

                Yes, it is a non-zero cost. I’m pretty sure the dollar cost isn’t the reason for it though. They care about the opportunity cost of not having exclusives. The PC ports made them profit. It just wasn’t as much as they hoped, and it made the console less desirable.

                • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  If PC game sales are cannibalizing PS sales, then there is a higher cost to creating and selling a PC port than just porting the game.

              • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Compared to various Xbox models, the PlayStation models were generally custom designed to a specific set of hardware and software criteria that aren’t fully mirrored on Windows PC.

                While we’re kibitzing about it, both the PS4 and PS5 are literally AMD x86 based PCs with AMD integrated GPUs stuffed into a plastic shell and running proprietary software. Said proprietary software is the only tricky bit, but both systems’ OS is based on FreeBSD. The OS has its own set of proprietary graphics APIs because Sony is gonna Sony, but they’re still talking to a commodity AMD GPU which could just as easily find its home in a PC.

                There is nothing new under the sun for the Playstation platform since the PS3, which was arguably the last interesting iteration.

          • Feyd@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Out of curiosity, do we have access to new vs old game data on other platforms? Probably makes sense to compare these things rather than assume it is different with only one side of the data

  • frunch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    Nobody’s asking for AI, it’s being forced upon us. It’s only going to get less accurate and helpful as time goes on and all the wasted money and resources to make it run will not be recovered. But it will not go away, people will just deal with it or stop using it.

    • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Only the children that can’t separate the fascinating technology from the techbros feel that way. The adults and people who understand nuance can clearly draw the line between what’s harmful to society and a new interesting technology with many applications.