• Stormcrow@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    But you’ll definitely want OneDrive, Teams, Edge, Chrome, Adobe and your totally necessary “anti-virus” to run in the background 24/7 right?

  • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Yeah no. I’m at 32 and task manager says that 28+GiB are being used on idle. The sum of everything that appears on task manager doesn’t reach 2GiB.

    And it’s not “the OS is using it because you aren’t”, because if I do anything demanding, the OS won’t give me back that RAM, it’ll use the swap instead.

    • filcuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That is not how this works. The system isn’t using all that, I can guarantee that. Even launching a terminal (or any app) as hidden will not make it and its usage appear in taskmgr - I once unknowingly managed to exhaust my 64GB by launching hundreds of terminal sessions withoutever killing them. Try something like sysinternals process manager to see what’s actually going on.

      • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You can guarantee it? Are you a Microsoft Windows developer? In that case, I’d like to fill in a bug report.

        When I turn my machine on, without me doing anything at all, task manager would display >20GiB used. I don’t have many applications to run at startup. At most iCUE (Corsair keyboard drivers). I don’t think iCUE is using 20GiB if RAM.

        Then, I open 2-3 vscode instances. Each instance launches its own rust-analyzer, since I’m looking at 3 rust projects simultaneously.

        Each rust-analyzer instance uses ~3GiB of RAM.

        That is enough to reach 100% ram usage and the computer becomes noticeably slower, even if CPU usage is at 7%.

        Tell me, Microsoft Windows developer. Why does my machine grind to a halt when I use ~10GiB of RAM, if win11 says that the recommended amount is 16GiB and I have 32? 10+16 = 26. I should have a minimum of 6GiB left. The math ain’t mathing.

          • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Not only are you a Microsoft developer. Are you also a maths PhD? I thought I was using maths of a level I’m comfortable with. Mainly addition, abstraction, and multiplication if real numbers.

            Perhaps I’ve committed a grave mistake. Please show me where my mistake is.

    • Tiral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You have other problems beyond windows. My laptop has 32gb and it uses like 6.5gb with nothing open on the desktop.

      • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It not happening to everyone doesn’t mean that it’s not an issue.

        Years back there was an issue with a windows update that eliminated the “Documents” folder on some people. I updated my computer and the folder was still there. It didn’t happen to me, but it did happen.

        There are millions of possible computer configurations. Some issues may happen in some computers but won’t happen in others.

        Even if 2 people have the same computer, they might have followed a different path to reach the current version of windows. Some might’ve started at win 10 and upgraded from there, others might’ve installed the latest version of win11.

        All those things might result in bugs happening in some devices but not on others.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I mean maybe, if you aren’t running any other softare at all and just staring at your desktop.

  • khánh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    23 hours ago

    “fine” depends on what you’re doing. web browsing? youtube? maybe, just dont open more than 5 tabs. doing literally anything else? no. get 12 gb or 16 gb ram.

  • DokPsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    1 day ago

    As someone who deals with various windows bullshit on the daily, 8gb for win11 is fine assuming you don’t use any applications. If you want to actually use the machine, 16gb is the absolute minimum

    • JordanZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      As a dev that has to use windows, our laptop was fine on windows 10 with 32gb until it fell out of support and they updated everyone to windows 11.

      After much fighting and proving with evidence that it was causing insane problems. They upgraded the devs to 64gb. I’m talking build times jumping from ~20 seconds to 15+ minutes if the ram use crept above about 70%…oof.

      • DokPsy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        Honestly some of my biggest fights are with browsers being ram hogs and edgewebview2 constantly shitting the bed causing excessive ram utilisation and various crashes to basic office applications

    • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I had to uninstall chrome and switch to edge on my work laptop just to make it usable. 8 is barely enough, if you’re very careful

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    24 hours ago

    1000% bs. My work pc has 8gb of ram and im always 100%. I hardly get anything done quickly if I open teams which I have to.

  • adarza@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    next they’ll say any ol’ hdd is fine, too.

    (they are not)

    if you ever have to use win11 on a laptop with 4 or 8gb ram and a 2.5in hdd, you’ll be inventing new swear words.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I mean, as long as you pair it with an optane cache drive it should be fine

      • adarza@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        optane was a horrible and ineffective ‘solution’ to windows and application bloat.

        • Cort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I think the product was good. But it was too little too late, since nand SSD pricing had already begun to drop. If it had a higher capacity, or lower pricing, or was released sooner it would have been a hit.

          I still use one for an os drive in my nas.

          • adarza@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            the one i still have just an ssd boot for a dietpi (debian mini server), separated from its hdd which is just file storage. as a regular ssd, the modules are ‘ok’. a bit slow–and of course very small, but higher endurance. i should never have to worry about it running out of writes in that little mini-server.

    • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      About halfway through the lifecycle for Windows 10, HDD performance became pure garbage and I genuinely do not know how/why they did that. Something about how they were handling indexing or read operations at idle meant pinning the disk at 100% usage almost all the time and the only solve was an SSD. I hate that shit so much.

  • ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Windows 10 had a minimum requirement of 2GB RAM, with 4GB recommended for a comfortable experience. Windows 11 bumped that up and then kept needing more as the OS got heavier with every update cycle.

    …to 4 GB…

    • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I’ve used Windows 10 with 4GB. It’s not a comfortable experience. Neither is Windows 11 with 8GB.

  • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Don’t worry, soon they will announce that 4GB will probably be fine too, once they discover they need even more RAM for their AI slop farms.

  • Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Why would they knowingly push for better but unnecessary hardware? What do they gain from people buying more RAM than necessary to run Windows?

    Edit: wait, they also sell laptops. Duh.

    Kids, learn from my mistakes, read article first, comment second.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nothing. It’s not unnecessary. It’s very necessary, especially Windows. They’re just shifting their perspective because RAM has gotten so wildly expensive.