• ruan@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Always use water and soap to completely clean, however using toilet paper to remove excess at the start, and using toilet paper again afterwards to dry the water after washing is the best, imo.

      But yeah, this is out of place for this meme, since perhaps you might end up using more toilet paper overall this way, but I think the end result is the most hygienic haha.

  • AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    You guys don’t have unit pricing? In Australia it’s required by law that supermarkets show price per standard unit of measurement so you can easily compare

    • awfulawful@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      16 hours ago

      We do! What’s really helpful is many products of the same category are in different units. One will be per sheet, one per roll, one per 100 sheets, one per 500 sheets… and then the true thickness is completely different, so 1 ply for one brand will hold up ok while another will start disintegrating the moment you pull it off the roll. Do you feel free yet?

  • Vespair@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I know this is a meme, but for the record math is one of the things LLMs are famously worst at

    • ruan@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Yes, but most of the paid “LLMs” are not actually just LLMs, they have specific aritimetic modules that end up being activated for most math questions that actual LLMs suck at, however are pretty easy for arithmetic modules, like simple calculations, unit conversions, etc…

      So yeah, any edge “LLM” tool currently will always get the original question asked here CORRECT even on the free tiers, you can test it yourself on Google Search itself in “AI mode”, on ChatGPT, or DeepSeek…

      So you are technically correctly in saying that LLMs suck and cannot be trusted for math in almost any case. However you are wrong on implying that ChatGPT, or other commercial models are just LLMs, they are not.

      P.S.: I’m not condoning the use of AI to resolve math related questiona, nor saying that their replies should be trusted, just stating the fact that actual “AI” products use more than just a large language model to generate their responses, and for math related questions most “AI” today will get arithmetic question answered correctly NOT DEPENDING on having training for the exact questiona being asked since they can identify a math arithmetic question being asked and instead of trying to fully generate the answer with the model itself, which would lack the training data to be able to process such wide range of possible question, they generate placeholders internally and let a arithmetic like module do the calculations, which take negligible processing power to be cacoulated by CPUs.

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Can confirm; I teach statistics and allow take home exams. I don’t even really need guardrails on the math-- if you cheat via LLM, your answer is almost always hilariously wrong.

      • Mika@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I’ve not used gpt for quite a while, but can’t you ask to python script the evaluation?

        • EnsignWashout@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          For simple math that could work, and as long as the question is close enough to an exact match with plenty of published examples to copy.

          A good rule of thumb is that the script it will come up with is about as likely to be correct as blindly taking the highest voted answer to the most similar question on Stack Overflow.

          If the question is simple and common, the odds are quite good. If the question is nuanced or rare, the odds of a correct result drop off aggressively.

    • Gormadt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yesterday I literally had to count 14 thousand pounds of fire extinguishers (as in count each extinguisher in a bunch of crates), one of my coworkers came over and said “Why don’t you just use AI to count them.” They then pulled out their phone, took a picture, asked AI to count them, and was off buy almost 60% on the first crate. Then went “oh, well that’s just one example,”

      They then tried 4 more times, being between 75% and 50% off each time. They then went “Oh, well, ummm, nevermind.” and wandered off again.

      (I had to count the extinguishers to make a Bill of Lading for them for shipping them out, you need an accurate count otherwise it will be held by the shipping company until you provide a correct BoL with the correct count due to legal reasons. I couldn’t just weigh them and divide the total wieght by the weight of a single extinguisher as they were a bunch of different sizes mixed together. NGL it was the easiest money I’ve ever made at the at job.)

      • Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        20 hours ago

        NGL it was the easiest money I’ve ever made at the at job

        Easy money for you. For me that work would have been torture.

        • Gormadt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Oh it sucked for sure, I kept getting interrupted which meant whatever crate I was counting at the time had to be started over.

          But the biggest perk was not having to deal with the other idiots on our loading dock for the entire time I was counting.

          Though I’ve joked about it in the past I really should get a shirt that says “I’m trying to focus on my job, please don’t distract me” or something like that.

    • trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      You can also get a travel bidet, if you can’t permanently install one, or just want to try it out. It’s basically just a squeeze bottle with a nozzle…

        • trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Sure, I guess, for trying out what a bidet would be like, you can do that.

          For more regular usage, though, when you can’t install a proper bidet, I would recommend investing the 10-20 bucks for a travel bidet. It’s a lot easier/quicker, when the splash water goes straight into the toilet and you don’t have to completely take off your pants+socks…

    • errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have wondered what the math of a bidet is. Decent ones cost a few hundred bucks. When does the TP saving win out? How long do bidets last?

      • bizarroland@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        There are cheap ones that just connect to the water line between your toilet and the tank and they’re like 20 bucks and they’ll last you a couple years.

        It takes a little getting used to the cold water spray, but I mean if you’re that desperate that you’re calculating the 30 cent difference per roll, then it might be worth the investment.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Honestly bidets are super fancy but you could just go with a “bum gun.” Little gentle water sprayer you attach to your toilet line and voila. Got mine for like $20-$30 or something.

        Quite incredible. So much that I’m miffed this isn’t a standard expected thing on toilets.

      • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Personally I started using like. 75% less TP once I got a bidet. Combined with spending $30 on the bidet itself, that’s easy savings.

        You can get a cheap one for like $25-50 and install it yourself (pretty easy, not actual plumbing, just screwing and unscrewing a few things) and they’re fine. The more expensive ones have heated water, but you don’t need that. I eventually sprang for a “nicer” one, but now I feel that was unnecessary. Maybe I’m a freak, but I prefer the cold water anyway.

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I just got into a little spat with my friends fiance because she intellectually offloads with AI.

    I stand by it.

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The number of people I know who now ask AI instead of web searching is… very upsetting.

        • arin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 day ago

          That might be intentional and also coz of the shitty ai blog/info sites

          • Nate Cox@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            22 hours ago

            In the case of Google it is very much intentional, and documented. Good search means fewer search attempts and that means fewer displayed ads.

          • TheFrirish@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
            link
            fedilink
            Français
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            20 hours ago

            100% it is barely usable now I gave Kagi a few tries and was really impressed by how good and sane the results are but I cannot get myself to hand out more money to an American company.

            I should add that they are what’s called a Public Benefit Corporation now so there is so effort coming from them.

      • Kirp123@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you search Google just serves you their AI shit. The other day their AI told me the word “rainy” has 4 letters.

      • SGforce@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Yesterday I googled: Hardware store “City Name”. It only returned stores from a different city. So I googled: Hardware store “City Name City Name City Name” and it returned a single one for every result

      • DrCake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Google search has got so bad in the last couple of years that I actually don’t blame people for using AI for this.

      • ジン@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        the number of people who are web searching are still majorly just consuming google’s AI and thats… more upsetting

  • dil@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Its extra fucked because the sheer amount of money ppl at the top have now, like the gap is getting bigger and bigger, why is everyone still broke, how do they benefit from ppl not buying things, like my walmart is full of expired sht all the time now, way less traffix

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    This actually isn’t too hard to solve. Double the value of each option by removing the folding requirement from the 2-ply and halving the price of the 3-ply to get an even comparison of 2-ply (330 sheets for $0.70) and 3-ply (300 sheets for $0.60), then recognize that it’s not worth adding 1/6 the price for 1/10th the sheets, to see that the 3-ply option is better.

    • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      That’s needlessly complicated.

      If you’re folding the 2-ply, you only get 165 wipes. So divide 70 by 165 to get 0.42 cents a wipe

      Now the 3-ply is 300 wipes, so divide 120 by 300 to get 0.40 cents a wipe

      The cheap stuff is more expensive.

    • Zarobi@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      But we need to take into account that the folded 2 ply becomes an effective 4 ply, so you’re getting more ply per penny

    • Tommelot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not folding 3-ply is asking for added expenses in the form of water and soap though… Push right through em

      • howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The ply count doesn’t reflect thickness or softness at all. Of the 3-ply toilet papers I’ve used at home, some need three layers to not fall apart on the first wipe, others are fine with a single sheet.

    • ジン@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Feel like bidet’s must be accounted for if we gonna start the math justifications

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      It hurts my brain to do it that way.

      300 sheets for 1.2 is a nice division by .6: 500 sheets for $2. So now all we gotta do is multiply by .7 to get 350 sheets for 1.40.

      Considering the fold, we are at 330 effective sheets for 1.40. 350 > 330, get the 3 ply (lol).

      This is a little bit funky obviously and just works because of seeing a divisor. If not for that I would have tried once each way to get cost per full effective sheet or cost per half effective sheet to see which one has nicer numbers.

      … Or just open the calculator app.

  • Jumi@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I shit and shower at work, not simultaneously though

    Tap for spoiler

    most of the time

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Gotta stomp those spicy nuggets away. Then wash your shit-caked feet.

        • rmuk@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          Better to shower shit than shit showers.

          Edit: fuck, I should have said “better to shit in the shower than shower in the shit”, that would have been way better.