• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Far [insert preferred political allegiance] simply means extremist, usually unwilling to compromise. Whether you think that’s a good thing or a bad thing depends on your personal political opinions, but generally speaking an inability to reach a compromise is not a desirable trait regardless of your political leanings.

    As a saying goes, perfect is the enemy of good. We don’t want people refusing to embrace more libertarian policies simply because they don’t get everything that they want. Progress is achieved by steadily grinding away at the norm, not by having a big explosive change all at once. That’s what communists want.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    i think the “current far left” supports authoritarianism, so not the opposite, just different flavor of the same side.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      That’s because the political compass is two-dimensional, but everyone insists on thinking of it as a one-dimensional thing.

      You’ve got left wing and then you’ve got right wing, and then in the vertical direction you’ve got authoritarianism and libertarianism. When people say far right and far left what they really mean is that the extreme edges horizontally and right at the top vertically. Think Castro, and not Gandhi. Both were left wing but are nowhere near each other in political phasespace

  • tangonov@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    How about we stop pretending that the left doesn’t have its own share of emotionally damaged asshats and try to pick leadership that solves problems instead of pandering to one side or the other?

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    From a Canadian instance, really? This shit is so frustrating to see. The whole two party nonsense that this bullshit pushes is exactly why the usa is in the mess they are in now.

    No, people don’t have to “pick a side” the ones who think in terms of teams are our enemy.

    • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The problem is not there are two sides. The problem is that there is only one side with 2 parties with the rest left unrepresented.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The reason it is like that is that over many years the us system pushed the teamification of politics and enshrined only two parties in law. This was inevitable with only two parties, and should be a lesson to all other nations on the dangers of two party systems. The “us vs them” tricks of control are very easy when there is only two parties. It is poison to any democracy as no one is represented by ether “side” but everyone is sorted into a side and convinced the only way to fix anything is by having your side win (but of course there is no insensitive for ether party to actually fix anything, often the opposite).

        The us has been trained (and sadly a lot of the world) that coalition rule is bad, even when its the only real way to have any sort of representation or guard rails in government. And you are right no one is represented now due to years and years of only two options that both know they are built into the systems of government so deep that their removal would require a new nation. After all this time there is no longer meaningful representation, but there is convenient scapegoats and excuses in pointing at the other side, so people in the us still think they live in a democratic system.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Oh it looks that way on purpose, there are barely two parties and its used to control the people. When you see “everyone else” that is the trick, the other party that is not in power does nothing but gets to be seen the one that is “representing” that mass.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Opposing fascism is illegal, and centrists have a fetish for Law And Order. That shoves a lot of people leftward by default.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      47
      ·
      1 day ago

      This meme is made by a leftist, and that community does have an issue with the same “if you don’t explicitly agree with everything we say, you are other and therefore evil” attitude that the MAGA crowd has.

      • Tippy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Thank God a brave centrist was willing to come here to criticize the left and defend the right to protect us from evil socialist extremism.

        Please, oh holy enlightened central one, tell us the errors of our thinking. Is it our sins of universal healthcare, anti-genocide, and equal rights for all?

        Please, oh please, do sermon us on the benefits of the right like unregulated capitalism, environmental destruction, and thought policing

        • Woht24@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Your sarcasm mutes your point terribly and this is the exact shit that has resulted in the ‘left memes’ being a sniveling crying loser.

          I don’t know the guy you replied to from a loaf of bread but how did he support the right? He said both left and right and doing the same shit and you come out with these 3 rambling paragraphs, assuming things wildly.

          • Tippy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I’m really not sure how to dumb it down more to make it make sense to you, given that the sarcasm and hyperbole dumbed it down quite a bit intentionally for effect. I guess read slower?

        • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Is a shitty attitude a defining point of being a leftist? Because that’s the only thing I’m criticizing here. Everything else is just you making up things to be mad about.

          • Tippy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            22 hours ago

            So when you get rightfully criticized, your response is to cry that all of your criticisms are made up and that everyone besides you is wrong and has a bad attitude

            If everyone you meet is an asshole, maybe you’re the asshole instead. But having that epiphany would involve you dropping that iconic “better than you” smugness that centrists love so much and giving a fuck about other people instead

            • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              20 hours ago

              What part of your comment was “legit criticism”? All you did was assume I’m a centrist and go off with a bunch of sarcasm based on that.

              If you were trying to say that the the way some leftists attack everyone for everything is justified or necessary in some way, you should have tried making that point without adding in assumptions and sarcasm.

              • Tippy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                20 hours ago

                We’re assuming you’re a centrist because you’re very clearly trying to hold the exact position that the OP meme is mocking. My sarcasm is on point here because such a position is foolish and worthy of ridicule, and the hyperbole does an excellent job of pointing out the blatant falsehood of the entire political spectrum being equal.

                I have no obligation to entertain right-wing viewpoints, give them a platform, or respect anyone who thinks they are worth consideration. In fact, I have an obligation to the do the exact opposite in defense of the victims of those viewpoints coming to fruition.

                My advice would be to get off the fence and grow a thicker skin. No one likes centrists, especially whiny ones who think they’re above reproach or consequence.

                • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  You truly are proving the point I was making. Go back and look at the first comment I made that started this whole thread.

                  What if I rephrase to leave out mentioning MAGA, and simply say “the way some leftists choose to communicate is counterproductive”. What part of that statement says anything about actual leftist policy?

                  The knee-jerk reactions of people in this thread is exactly what I am taking issue with. Based on a single sentence, criticizing not leftist ideals, but criticizing the choice of how some people communicate, now you assume you know my position on all topics, based on your idea of what a “centrist” is (a term the is quickly becoming as useless as the term “woke”).

        • Angry_Drunken_Robot@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          and equal rights for all?

          Some one did not read the Canadian Constitution or the bill of rights.

          Tell us, oh, wise one, about the ‘equal rights’ in Gladue?

          • Tippy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Whoops, I forgot that I singularly control the equality settings for every nation on the planet, including Canada. Let me just pop over to the control panel.

              • Tippy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                19 hours ago

                I’m so sorry bro, I should’ve paid better attention to the training material when I became The Leftist™️

            • Angry_Drunken_Robot@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              19 hours ago

              No one said you ‘control it’ But you are the one who seems to think we have it.

              maybe do your homework before spouting lies and bullshit??

              • Tippy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                19 hours ago

                I never claimed Gladue, Canada has utopian equality, actually. I couldn’t even point it out on a map. As another user pointed out, leftism ADVOCATES and works towards those ideals, which very clearly was what I was saying in context. If you had a functional frontal lobe, this might be an easier conversation for you. Maybe iron out the dent in your brain before trying to tackle big conversations, lil fella

          • DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Where did they say it’s what we have, because to me it reads that those are what we’re fighting for.

            This includes indigenous peoples.

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Leftists barely agree with each other, let alone anybody elsewhere on the political spectrum. You aren’t entirely wrong, though - there is a tendency to say that anything good is leftist and anything bad is right-wing, but right-wingers also do the same (see how anything they don’t like is either woke or communist, or both)

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          but right wingers are mostly homogeneous in thier beliefs, with the hefty help of the propaganda MSMs and financial backing. left doesnt have a propaganda machine promoting “left”, thats why there isnt any unified belief amongst all left leaning people.

        • balderdash@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Yeah there is a massive range of disagreement under the umbrella term “leftists”. Marxist, Marxist-Leninist, Trotskyist, Maoist, Communization theory, Anarcho-communist, Eco-anarchist, Christian anarchist, etc. etc.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            These are all largely arguments over organizing a working class majority in control of it’s own lands and capital. None in these groups objects to the central thesis of worker self-government.

            By contrast, centrist/right groups favor narrow hierarchies of elite oligarchs, them bicker over exactly which one of their kingpins should get the big chair.

        • Jimjim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          So, most people make generalizations based on personal biases? And its human nature tendency to have “in-groups” and “out-groups”? That simple though?

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          19 hours ago

          And anything that doesn’t involve a fencepost tickling their prostate is a sin to centrists.

          Their g-spot is pretty far to the right though.

          • cygnus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Yes, a lot of self-proclaimed centrists are rather right-wing but like to picture themselevs as occupying the middle of the bell curve. See also their use of the term “common sense” when they want to feel like their view is the majority one despite that not being supported by statistics.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        if you don’t explicitly agree with everything we say, you are other and therefore evil

        “Vote Blue No Matter Who”

        (Except Mamdani)

        • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Mamdani is a pretty good example of the left doing things right; get the right guy nominated at the party level, then worry about the election. In a two party system, election day is too late to fix anything, it’s purely damage control at that point.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Mamdani is a pretty good example of the left doing things right

            He ran at the right time, the stars aligned and gave him some truly wretched losers for opposition, and national media tripped over a dozen billionaire’s dicks trying to insert itself into municipal politics.

            But I don’t think Mamdani would have been successful against a Guliani, a Bloomberg, or a DeBlasio. And if a Republican had won over a fractured Liberal/Left field, I suspect we’d be getting an earful about how Radical Islamists cost the Democratic Party the election.

            There’s thousands of Mamdani’s in modern American politics. You can find them in every DSA chapter in America. He’s not simply the product of The Left Doing Things Right. He’s a product of the liberals and conservatives finally running out of gas, then tangling themselves in a knot trying to block an alternative.

      • Woht24@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yep, I think real centrists see them both as frothing at the mouth fucking idiots who treat the world and politics like a sports team.

        It’s a fucking joke.

            • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              1 day ago

              Based on what? The fact that I don’t fall over myself to agree with whatever the leftist opinion-du-jour is? Comments like yours are specifically why the leftist movement is doomed to failure. It’s a shame, since most the ideas are good, just too many self-righteous assholes are the vocal face of it.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                18 hours ago

                The fact that I don’t fall over myself to agree with whatever the leftist opinion-du-jour is?

                Getting strong Know-Nothing vibes of this whole thread. No real ideological thesis or central position. Just a bunch of hollow “I’m a free thinker because I hate you” reactionary slop.

                Reminds me of the old joke about the conservative being whatever the opposite of a liberal is, updated daily.

                • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  I’m very purposely trying to keep my opinions about policy points out of it, because that’s not what I was ever taking issue with, and it would only serve to completely derail the conversation.

                  All I’ve ever been taking issue with is the discourse itself. The US has a two party system, which is inherently going to encourage a very “us vs them” mentality. When people immediately jump to name calling, ridicule, and general verbal abuse at the first hint of disagreement, it’s only making things worse.

              • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                18
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                1 day ago

                Wordy and self-aggrandizing but basically yeah, you even admit the ideas are good and that the only reason you pretend otherwise is because you don’t like the people telling you them, get the fuck over yourself and start being correct about things

                • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  24 hours ago

                  Can you even read? I said the left has an attitude problem, just like the right does. That says absolutely fuck-all about how I feel about the actual ideas behind leftism.

                • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  24 hours ago

                  I view libertarianism similarly to how I view communism (the actual philosophies not the co-opted bullshit Libertarianism or the red scare version of communism); they are systems that seem like they could work if you somehow got everyone on the same page, but I don’t believe that they are robust enough to withstand the people who would exploit the system.

                  I feel like half the problem with politics right now is that everyone feels like they have to pick a label to call themselves. So they pick whichever is closest to what they believe at the time, then (consciously or unconsciously) mold themselves to conform with that chosen group. Suddenly, everyone who disagrees is personally attacking them, since they went and made their political affiliation part of their identity, rather than just a choice they make.

    • Arctic_monkey@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Counterargument: Centrists are actually a diverse group with many very different positions, that just have in common the fact they don’t agree with either of the currently dominant political factions.

      Aggressive reposte: what you just did (political stereotyping, where you label everyone who disagrees with you as basically being the same cartoon villain) is, in my experience, an example the left-wing bigotry that drives centrists away from your political faction. Disagreeing with your doesn’t mean that I agree with the hateful morons on the right, it just means I also see and won’t tolerate your bigotry.

      • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        So hating a hateful ideology and people who hold that ideology is bigotry. Damn, you need to see a chiropractor, you just twisted yourself in knots for that poor argument.

        • Arctic_monkey@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          No, the bigotry is lumping all centrists, who have a diversity of views, in with the hateful ideology, despite having zero information about what they actually believe.

          • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice. - Martin Luther King Jr.

            Most centrists I have interacted with have the same thought, I don’t care as long as I’m not affected by it. As long as the sense of order is maintained they will let babies starve, houses burn, and deforest our planet to maintain that stability. So you must excuse those of us on the left who have interacted with people more conservative to us for so long. We’re tired of the bullshit and we’re not going to let you live it down anymore. I have heard people talk about how centrists/moderates, whatever term you use to describe them, are the swing voters. From my personal experience in the USA with the moderate, the moderate fucking sucks.

            If the moderate is who truly votes in presidents then they have failed us multiple times now with Trump. Thoroughly, absolutely. I don’t know how you can live a life seeing the horrors perpetuated for money and power to still think our system okay. If you’re not swayed by the plight of the fact we can feed everyone on the Earth, we just cannot satisfy the gluttony of the wealthy to do so. Of maintaining order while a group of people who had no choice in their birth are subjugated, beaten, rounded up and jailed just for existing, and lynched for existing. If you look at everything wrong in this world and aren’t galvanized away from moderation and right wing politics, then you’re lost.

    • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I’ll summarize something I said before:

      Democrats will hurt you for money, but Republicans will pay for the privilege. Both parties subservient to capital but there are still meaningful distinctions. Change must come from the bottom.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Okay but the Far Left is antisemitic because they don’t support Israeli genocide freedom and democracy. So they’re even worse than MAGA.

    • Woht24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I’m glad we’ve got someone capable of identifying and stating how others sit on a political plain.

  • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Far left citizens may oppose fascism but their leaders aren’t doing a good job of it. America needs a better left wing party.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The US doesn’t really have a far left. It barely has a left. What MAGA calls left tends to be rather center, like the position that people should be able to afford healthcare.

  • Macchi_the_Slime@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Yeah, both are too loud and impeding the centrist ability to go back to Brunch lmao

    Brunch: May or may not include stuffing their own pockets

      • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        8 days ago https://lemmy.world/post/39694498

        These “Leftist good, right bad, central dumb dumb I see no difference” meme’s are to Lemmy what the Big Mac is to McDonalds. This place is littered with the same, tired, fucking false fallacy. Dear lord, leading up to Dementia Donny winning his second term, 3/4ths the post on Lemmy were just that. Wasn’t accurate, original, or funny the first 50 fucking times, not sure it’s going to be any other time.

        Fw: Fw: Fw: Fw: Lemmy post (FUNNY!!!)

  • 𝔗𝚎𝚑 𝔅𝚊𝚖𝚜𝚔𝚒@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    What if I informed you that there are more than two options, and they don’t have to be extremities? And what if I followed up by informing you that what we have in the US, for a political spectrum, is not the norm elsewhere in the world?

    • balderdash@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The political spectrum in the U.S. omits leftists entirely. Both Republicans and Democrats are pro-capitalism and pro-U.S. imperialism.

      • 𝔗𝚎𝚑 𝔅𝚊𝚖𝚜𝚔𝚒@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        My reply was more aimed at the title of the post and its sentiment. “Pick a side”

        I’m not a believer that there are only two political options for the US, long term, and would love to see a true political multi-party representation in the US government. I believe that something not completely (EU) far left will prevail in the US. And absolutely not the (US) far right. (Perhaps I’m just being a wishful fool, and the US will crash and burn in the next 1-5 years. Hopefully, we can make it out of this mess without doing so. But if it has to happen, so be it.)

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          completely (EU) far left

          The EU is only “far left” in comparison to the US.

          But that’s because the US has moved so far to the right that they can’t see any other political position from where they stand.

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            US has always been right wing, never even went center left once. thats why the far right of western countries flee to the us, so they can grift there. US is more closer to russia than they are to EU politically spekaing.

    • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’d respond by saying you’re too stupid to safely walk and chew at the same time and advise you to stop talking