me like use nano. nano say how do thing. nano exit easy.

  • Cevilia (they/she/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Fortunately, every computer comes equipped with an “exit editor” button. It’s on the back, attached to the power supply unit. You just flick the switch. Exits every editor known to humanity. /j

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I used some distro with vim back in the day and I just kept using it. I lose my shit when I use something with just nano and my muscle memory tries to do a vim thing.

  • smh@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I love nano. I used to do tech support for a Linux-based content management system (before SAaS take took off)… The customer sysadmins were sometimes whichever engineer was volun-told to do it, so competency varied wildly.

    I helped mostly with installs. This might be the poor newbie sysadmin’s first time on the command line. Nano was my go-to suggestion for editing config files–all the commands are right there! Much less intimidating than vi or emacs for a newbie.

  • Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Some real talk.

    Can we just include the 4 most popular text editors on basic systems??

    Like i wanna scream when there isnt my text editor installed on a lightweight distro.

    Vi Emacs Micro Nano

    For context,

    Debian ships with nano and vi Openwrt only ships with nano

    Like cant we just include small editors. In a perfect world i would want neovim installed. But i understand its larger and has alot more dependency’s.

    So having VI isnt as good but im willing to be reasonable.

    JUST INCLUDE VI

    the reason i learned vim is because VI is installed by default on almost every distro.

    Im tempted to try emacs tho

  • neomachino@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    When I was first learning how to code I was working on some beginner project and couldn’t figure it out. I asked a friend who knew a few things what I was doing wrong and he hopped on my computer, fixed the code then opened it in vim and told me my project wasn’t working because of whatever text editor I was using (I think sublime). So for like a year I hardly learned how to code but I got pretty dang good with vim.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The image is misleading. The brain sizes represent the amount of grey matter it takes to operate the editor. The nano guy has plenty of brain power left over for things like hygiene, breathing and basic reasoning.

  • cepelinas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    10 hours ago

    nano is just a text editor, I use it as a text editor, it has keybindings on screen by default, no need to config or memorise, why bother? (for text editing, not whatever people use vim or emacs for)

    • AbsolutelyClawless@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Kind of, but not really? Nano by default displays US English(?) keyboard bindings which are different to the keyboard I have, so I still have to have a cheat sheet open when I’m on a system with nano-only editor.

    • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’ve been in camp Vim for decades, but I almost always suggest micro to people dipping their toe into Linux. I can’t imagine thinking nano, or whatever, would be more comfortable unless the person has never used a computer before.

  • ruuster13@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I do appreciate this in nano. It helps me complete the new container config occasionally required to install vim.

    • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’m team nano, I’m not smart enough to use the other two and for whenever I need to open a text file in terminal only environment once every year I can remember how to navigate nano. So I’ll keep using nano.

      • Mika@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I use emacs but it’s only convenient to me with a lot of custom stuff on top. Vanilla emacs tho, hell no.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yes. It’s newby-friendly, what is great for the time every 2 or 3 years that it opens in my face and there’s no alternative editor installed.

      Copy and paste are there too, but there’s no reason to use them instead of the terminal buffer, so I can edit things in an editor I like. I just wish it made it easier to delete several lines at the same time.